October 1953 | Mapleton, Maine
hound=inval
_y_ a oh a Le alk ow ; Fry 1 ; . 4a = # = ba “ry Rh : . 3s
To wound, Ox eks at 80 der ~laveilon 170 de he
wo
>
#
: §.% » i
AL! : aq ® i § 5 a 5 YE ’ a 3 | ph
a gi
GM
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.
oo
. x rT cE EE i 5 i ra E" - va
RTO 10. — SOUR adrzen and perators
I — | — — — — — 8 = Ee — = re
-_ ¥ iq _ ™ A PITY TRT py “I L | ~ n
DATE OF RiPont — PATE IN VIC —
i — — ee ——— ee——— EE —— — i ———— ———
- ( Gnd yop
MTV OR COLO <azny
Tey a 5 , — . = a = - - w y " | - TTT
Varrines slow to Ge ob
iE a= a - = ) LL i [I . - .
SPUYD yery fast Plott eee
— Ew ——— ee, pe —— a = i Ee — =
i FE i Co 5 ¥ m= i (FE J J i. - x a i . . jo
oy a I'l ) SE—— oo ih dd i re - 0) ; CW eErv od vk ite mod RE og TL Hog
COURT CM Co LVNGWH OF TI ODOIAVD cee
— — — ——— — C—O OW me S— A.
oe 17 _ MA OF CACERVATIGH Ground Co
VAIN sme | OO MAIRUVERD llorizontal moneuvers only
Te TS Ta [I SS —
k] | i a -
ET] a B = gg,
ro a 3 ¥ w OO wm a - yaw a om gm
TL-e | Lo! / Jaa we a wl dh i ale oo or bar a WH la L ly ww
= i ¥ 2 f= _ _ 1 | EE Hj IT'S " — i i Le = — Fe i ee] i a = = ot a
Pili ti oy ' oo oda’ ne ] thr our, 1 bi: OoLLNTS 0 i tT ad he we LT CE 1 =
EE —— So oo . oo - oo = : WE | = +1 - A -— a = at = pe & i ll i
Fd ale il rg = Ad Le Np i LL Va »
oy Ian — - - avy
rig 4 I SO ag ad
J WOU
5 dell FOOCT al aCe
Wh 1 Ns ‘IC ro. ; 329
=
Ee:
----------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION
File: 1949-08-6311826-Medford-Ore--419-.pdf
Transcribed by Claude Sonnet 4.6 for GlitchyMatrix.com/bluebook/
================================================================
FIELD 1 -- DATE: 8 August 1949
FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: Medford, Oregon
(East and southeast of city per
investigation letter)
FIELD 3 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: Local 1120P-1230P (Pacific;
approximately 11:20 AM to
12:30 PM)
FIELD 4 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION:
Ground-Visual [X]
Ground-Radar [ ]
Air-Visual [ ]
Air-Intercept Radar [ ]
FIELD 5 -- PHOTOS: No (not available per
investigation letter; sketches
not available per same;
see note on CONFIDENTIAL
message sketch below)
FIELD 6 -- SOURCE: Airmen and Tower Operators
(AACS military personnel +
CAA operators, Medford Municipal
Airfield and Medford Airways)
FIELD 7 -- LENGTH OF OBS: Approximately 1 hour 10 minutes
FIELD 8 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: Varying 1 to 7
FIELD 9 -- COURSE: No specific heading held;
last seen heading west
FIELD 10 -- BRIEF SUMMARY:
[This case uses the Temporary ATIC Form 329 (2 Jan 52).
The form layout differs from the standard ATIC 329 Rev 26
Sep 52. The MANEUVERS field on this form carries content
equivalent to Field 10:]
Horizontal maneuvers only. When tower personnel observed
object through binoculars, wings were noted. The objects
would fly formation for a while, break off and reform in
a trail formation. They would disappear for short periods
but reappeared in the same general area.
[Cut-off text at card bottom, partially legible: "other
tails of thistle?" -- reference to secondary sightings
dismissed as thistle balls per investigation letter]
FIELD 11 -- COMMENTS:
[No separate comments field on this form variant. See
supplemental documents.]
FIELD 12 -- CONCLUSIONS:
[ ] Was balloon
[ ] Probably balloon
[ ] Possibly balloon
[ ] Was aircraft
[ ] Probably aircraft
[ ] Possibly aircraft
[ ] Was astronomical
[ ] Probably astronomical
[ ] Possibly astronomical
[ ] Other: _______________
[ ] Insufficient data for evaluation
[ ] Unidentified
[Note: No conclusion checkboxes appear on the Temporary
ATIC Form 329 (2 Jan 52). Case is non-evaluated in the
archive. The investigation letter explicitly states "No
definite conclusions as to the identity or nature of the
objects were reached."]
Form: TEMPORARY ATIC FORM 329 (2 JAN 52)
[Retroactive filing -- record card created approximately
2.5 years after the sighting; case processed under Project
Grudge, Incident No. 419; re-entered into Blue Book system
on interim form before standardization of Rev 26 Sep 52.]
Supplemental docs: (1) TCM 452, 10 August 1949, McChord
Flight Service Center, UNCLASSIFIED; 3 pages; listing 5
named (redacted) witnesses; signed Paul O. McGinnis, 1st
Lt USAF, S-2. (2) Earlier version of same TCM 452 letter,
signed for commanding officer; identifies 7 witnesses (5
AACS/Airways personnel + 2 CAA). (3) CONFIDENTIAL incoming
message (declassified), 9 August 1949, from Flight VC
Center McChord AFB; routing to N-P AFB ATTN MCIAXC-3, INFO
Flight SVC Washington DC; marked ACTION COPY; includes a
hand-drawn sketch of an oval/ellipse shape with a dark
central element, labeled "WHE"; signed LIVESAY. (4) Incident
419 questionnaire (partially completed): date, time (1130P),
number (3), color (silver), altitude (presumed above 17,000
ft), speed (very fast, greater than standard jet aircraft);
most fields blank.
================================================================
SEARCH INDEX TERMS
================================================================
Medford Oregon Jackson-County 1949 August-8 6311826 incident-419
Grudge Project-Grudge AACS airways tower-operators CAA
theodolite binoculars instrumented-observation multi-witness
shiny silver wings formation trail-formation very-high-altitude
30000-feet 17000-feet varying-1-to-7 varying-speed horizontal
no-sound no-exhaust unaided-eye sun-reflection
McChord DC-4 United-Air-Lines Livesay McGinnis
thistle-balls non-evaluated unevaluated retroactive-filing
Temporary-ATIC-Form-329 1940s Pacific
================================================================
CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION
-----------------------
Non-evaluated. The investigation by Detachment 1905-1 of the
1905th AACS Squadron explicitly concluded that no definite
determination could be made, since accurate observations
could not be achieved at the altitude involved. No conclusion
checkboxes were filled on the record card. The case entered
the Project Grudge files as Incident 419 and was retroactively
transferred to the early Blue Book system on the January 1952
interim form without a formal evaluation being recorded.
The investigation letter dismisses secondary sightings
received after news spread as likely "balls of thistle
prevalent in the area at the time" -- a plausible explanation
for secondary reports but one that was never applied to the
original multi-witness, instrumented sighting. The cut-off
text at the bottom of the record card appears to reference
this thistle dismissal in a context suggesting it was
considered for the original case as well. It was not a
serious analytical conclusion.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS
-----------------------
Seven witnesses at Medford Municipal Airfield observed
objects east and southeast of Medford from approximately
11:20 AM to 12:30 PM on 8 August 1949. Conditions were
excellent: sky clear, visibility 30 miles, full midday
illumination. The observers included AACS military airmen,
CAA range operators, and Medford Airways and Tower
personnel -- a mix of trained aviation professionals across
two organizations.
Two instruments were brought to bear. Medford Radio used
a theodolite to observe the objects. Medford Tower personnel
used binoculars. The binocular observation produced the
most significant finding in the record: wings were visible
on the objects, though no further identification could be
made.
Altitude was established by cross-reference. A United Air
Lines DC-4 in the vicinity at seventeen thousand feet
reported to the Tower that it was unable to see any strange
objects, establishing a confirmed lower altitude bound.
The unofficial estimate from the investigation was thirty
thousand feet. Objects were visible to the unaided eye only
when reflecting sunlight.
Behavioral characteristics: the objects varied in number
from one to seven. They flew in formation, then broke off
to reform in trail formation. They disappeared for short
periods and reappeared in the same general area. Speed
varied from slow to very fast, with an estimate that the
objects were moving at a speed comparable to or greater
than standard jet aircraft. Maneuvers were horizontal only
-- no vertical component was observed. No sound. No exhaust.
POINTS OF INTEREST / WHAT GIVES ME PAUSE
-----------------------------------------
The wings observation is the central analytical fact of
this case. Tower personnel using binoculars at midday, in
30-mile visibility, described conventional wings. That is
a strong anchor for an aircraft identification, and in
1949 jet aircraft operating at 30,000 feet were unusual
but not unheard of.
What resists the straightforward aircraft identification
is the behavioral package. Aviation professionals at an
active airfield -- AACS airmen, CAA operators -- would be
expected to recognize conventional aircraft of the period.
The varying number (1 to 7), the disappearing and
reappearing in the same general area, the speed range
from slow to very fast, and the inability to identify the
aircraft type despite instrumented observation and binocular
scrutiny over 70 minutes are not consistent with routine
jet traffic at altitude.
The theodolite observation by CAA Range Static personnel
is notable and underdeveloped in the file. A theodolite
is a precision surveying instrument used to measure
elevation and azimuth angles. Its use implies at least
an attempt at systematic angular measurement, yet no
theodolite data -- angles, elevation readings, tracking
data -- appears in any of the supplemental documents.
Either the data was not recorded, was recorded elsewhere
and not included here, or the instrument was used only
for magnification (looking through the scope rather than
measuring). This is a documentation gap that matters.
The CONFIDENTIAL incoming message from McChord contains a
small hand-drawn sketch of the object: an oval/ellipse with
a dark elongated central element, labeled "WHE." This
appears to be an artist's rendering submitted with the
teletype report. The shape -- an oval with a dark interior
core -- does not strongly resemble a conventional aircraft
silhouette as seen from below, which would show wingspan
and fuselage. It reads more like an object seen roughly
face-on or at a high angle. This sketch is the only
visual record in the file.
The retroactive filing in January 1952 -- 2.5 years after
the sighting -- is itself worth noting. Grudge-era cases
were being back-processed into early Blue Book during this
period. Cases arriving this way without a prior conclusion
were often simply filed rather than evaluated, and this
one shows all the signs of that path.
BOTTOM LINE
-----------
Seven trained aviation observers, clear midday conditions,
theodolite and binoculars deployed, a UAL DC-4 providing
a confirmed altitude floor, wings identified visually --
and still no evaluation, no conclusion, no determination
after 2.5 years. The wings are the strongest argument for
a conventional aircraft explanation, and they are not
enough on their own to close the case given the behavior,
the duration, the varying count, and the failure of
experienced aviation personnel to identify what they were
looking at.
The thistle ball dismissal for the original sighting would
require thistle balls to fly formation, break trail, exceed
jet aircraft speeds, and operate at 30,000 feet. It does
not apply. Whatever was east and southeast of Medford that
noon was above 17,000 feet, moving at jet speeds or faster,
showing wings through binoculars, and declining to be
identified. The non-evaluation is honest. A guess would
have been less so.
================================================================
https://glitchymatrix.com/bluebook/
GlitchyMatrix Project Blue Book Archive
All 10,808 declassified USAF UFO case files, 1945-1969
================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------