GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
Date Unknown | Wink, Texas
6 pp
• ' \
Date Unknown | Calhoun Co, Michigan
16 pp
• , ' •
Date Unknown | Warren, Minnesota | Incident #109
INCIDENT #109 2 pp
• • File 109 January, 1948 Warren, Minnesota • 3 photos •
Date Unknown | Crosby, North Dakota
12 pp
• • • --------- ----------------·-
Date Unknown | Location Illegible
5 pp
Date Unknown | Norton, Kansas | Incident #124
INCIDENT #124 3 pp
Fi 1 p, FPhruary 1948 Norton, s 4 pnoto.s •
Date Unknown | Norton, Kansas | Incident #124
INCIDENT #124 3 pp
Fi 1 p, FPhruary 1948 Norton, s 4 pnoto.s •
Date Unknown | Location Illegible
12 pp
Date Unknown | Syracuse, New York
6 pp
Date Unknown | Bolt, Montana
8 pp
Date Unknown | Location Illegible
9 pp
• • • •
Date Unknown | Dayton, Ohio
15 pp
Date Unknown | Manchuria
8 pp
• I •
Date Unknown | Palo Alto, California
6 pp
• •
Date Unknown | Uruguay
5 pp
• • P ROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD ~------------------------
Date Unknown | San Angelo, Texas
7 pp
Date Unknown | Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
16 pp
• • ---- ....:..- - • •
Date Unknown | Las Vegas, Nevada
11 pp
Date Unknown | Opalocka, Florida
18 pp
• •I • . ., ........ . '
Date Unknown | Mesa, Arizona
12 pp
• I • ,, •
Date Unknown | Columbia, Missouri
8 pp
• , -- P RO , .0 ~73 RECORD
Date Unknown | Terry, Montana
4 pp
' • ' •
Date Unknown | Location Illegible
3 pp
• PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD •
Date Unknown | Cambridgecity, Indiana
18 pp
• . ......-............__....__........,......,.........___.........___ ...______ ,
Date Unknown | Xenia, Ohio
18 pp
' • •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1968-11-7170749-NorthMerrick-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION North Merrick, New York
DATE November 1968
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 7170749
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 13
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD • 1. D~TE • TIME GROUP ' 09/2300 2. LOCATION • • '.. • _Q Nn v1'~r _ffi 1 rlloL1 • Nrtr_' .h Mo..rr_ick ~ ew:,_~~:O..w •ru·lk~---------~ • 3. SOIJRCE 10, CONCLUSION .Ci vil ' an Possible Other (GROUND LIGHT) .4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS I Thet·e is no r e ason why the observation could not have been I _OnF> of a gr ound li bht reflecting from the cloud bases . S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11, BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 1 Second 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION