GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1953-04-6384545-Fukuoka-Japan.pdf
LOCATION Fukuoka, Japan
DATE April 1953
EVALUATION UNIDENTIFIED
CASE NO 6384545
DECADE 1950s
TYPE Sighting
OBSERVER Military
PAGES 6
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • • • • • • • • • • '· DA Tl • T1MI GIIOUP I. LOCATION "- .'......... ... .. .., _,...... '.) 0 ._., ~/lor.r. . .,, ...-.~ ""'I•'tl( )~'' l . l .. . . . . . . , J c•. • J ...• .' l • 10. CONCLUSION
---------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================ FTD 0-329 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION File: 1953-04-6384545-Fukuoka-Japan.pdf Transcribed from document image by Claude Sonnet 4.6 ================================================================ [Note on form: This record card uses FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) rather than the standard ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 52) used for contemporary 1953 cases. The Foreign Technology Division assumed responsibility for Blue Book from ATIC in 1961; the FTD form was applied retroactively when cases were being catalogued. The underlying AIIR (IR-1-53) is dated April 1953 and is the primary source document.] FIELD 1 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: 8 April 53 / 08/1055Z [Note: Japan Standard Time is UTC+9. 1055Z = 1955 JST, consistent with AIIR which gives time as 1955(I). "(I)" = India time zone = UTC+9 in wartime notation.] FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: Fukuoka, Japan [Note: Actual sighting position was over grid WJLE 0000 / WJKO 5857, in the Korea Strait northwest of Fukuoka, approximately over the waters between Tsushima Island and the Japanese coast. Home base was Itazuke AFB, Fukuoka, Kyushu.] FIELD 3 -- SOURCE: Military FIELD 4 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: One FIELD 5 -- LENGTH OF OBSERVATION: 20 Seconds [Note: The AIIR summary states approximately 45 seconds total. Pichon's written statement describes the parallel-flight phase as approximately 20 seconds. The 20-second figure on the record card appears to reflect the "flame" observation duration; 45 seconds is the total encounter.] FIELD 6 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION: Air-Visual FIELD 7 -- COURSE: Maneuvered FIELD 8 -- PHOTOS: No FIELD 9 -- PHYSICAL EVIDENCE: No FIELD 10 -- CONCLUSION: UNIDENTIFIED FIELD 11 -- BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS: AF Pilot first observed a dark object, then the object lit into a "bright blue colored flame". The object appeared approx 5,000 ft above and 20 deg to the right of a/c. Object crossed in front of nose of a/c and maintained a parallel position of about 3 deg to right of nose of the observer's a/c at 1,000 to 2,000 ft above. Observer placed his a/c in a climb to attempt identification and the light went out. Total observation of flame was about 20 seconds. No radar contact was made with the object although the radar set was working properly. No a/c were reported in area. Form: FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) Additional documents in this file: - Air Intelligence Information Report IR-1-53, AF Form 112 Part I, dated 9 April 1953, Area: Fukuoka, Kyushu; Subject: FLYOBRET; From: I/O, 68th Ftr-Intcp Sqdn., APO 929-2; Prepared by 2nd Lt. Billy B. Coggin, USAF, Intelligence Officer; Evaluation B-3. Summary: aerial sighting of unidentified flying object near Fukuoka, Japan, at 1955(I), 8 April 1953; a blob of blue light seen by one member of an F-94B type aircraft for approximately 45 seconds. Approved by Billy B. Coggin. - AIIR IR-1-53, AF Form 112 Part II, Page 2 of 3, containing detailed description (10 numbered items) signed by Billy B. Coggin. - AIIR IR-1-53, AF Form 112 Part II, Page 3 of 3, containing D/I FEAF Comment signed for Colonel George D. Hastings, Director of Requirements, Deputy for Intelligence, FEAF. - Statement of 1st Lt. Delphin J. Pichon (AO 1848480), USAF, first-person written account of the sighting, designated Inclosure #1 of IR-1-53. - USAF Flight Chart, Korea Strait area (scale 1:1,000,000), showing aircraft position and object track, designated Inclosure #2 of IR-1-53. Shows Pusan (Korea), Tsushima Island, Fukuoka, and Itazuke AFB, with plotted positions for aircraft and object at 1955I and 1956I. ================================================================ SEARCH INDEX TERMS ================================================================ Fukuoka Japan Kyushu Itazuke AFB Korea Strait Tsushima 1953 April F-94B Starfire fighter interceptor pilot 30000 feet 200 knots USAF 68th Fighter Interceptor Squadron military observer blue flame blue light dark object peripheral vision maneuvering UNIDENTIFIED GCI ground control intercept no traffic no radar contact Radar Observer radar negative air-visual Korean War K-9 Pusan Korea Delphin Pichon Billy Coggin George Hastings FEAF ATIC B-3 evaluation paralleled course crossed track dove gained speed reversed direction afterburner ruled out orange glow lacking Rawinsonde balloon no lights no aircraft vicinity 16000 feet above intelligent maneuver reaction climb light extinguished vanished flame bright blue blob calm winds clear no moon haze below 500 feet FLYOBRET ================================================================ CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6 ================================================================ THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION UNIDENTIFIED, with the FEAF intelligence chain having no explanation to offer beyond ruling out the obvious. The D/I FEAF comment notes that rawinsonde balloons are released from Itazuke daily but do not carry lights, and that no other information is available to account for the sighting. The pilot's own assessment was that the object was not a friendly aircraft, not an afterburner, and not anything he recognized. The case was reported through proper channels the next day and evaluated as coming from a usually reliable source. WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS At 1955 local (Japan Standard) time on 8 April 1953, First Lieutenant Delphin J. Pichon was returning to Itazuke Air Force Base from a mission to K-9, the US airfield at Pusan, Korea. He was in his F-94B Starfire, at 30,000 feet on a heading of 155 degrees (SSE), flying at 200 knots indicated airspeed. Conditions were clear above a haze layer below 500 feet, no moon, calm winds. In his peripheral vision Pichon first noticed a dark object in the sky. Then the object lit into what he described as an intense blue flame. At that point the object was approximately 4,000 to 5,000 feet above his aircraft and about 20 degrees to the right of his nose, tracking on a heading of approximately 135 degrees -- slightly more southerly than his own course but broadly similar -- at approximately his own airspeed. What followed was a sequence of maneuvers that Pichon documented in precise angular terms. The object crossed in front of his aircraft from right to left, diving and gaining speed, until it was about 10 degrees left of his nose. It then turned back from left to right, crossing back across his track. When it reached a position about 3 degrees right of his nose, it paralleled his aircraft's course -- matching his heading of approximately 155 degrees -- at a distance of about one mile and 1,000 to 2,000 feet above. The object held that parallel position. Pichon immediately initiated a climb to close the distance and attempt identification. As he climbed, the flame went out. His Radar Observer, in the rear cockpit, had been attempting throughout to establish radar contact. The radar was confirmed working properly. No contact was established. After the light vanished, Pichon searched the area with his aircraft's radar: negative results. He then contacted GCI -- Ground Controlled Intercept -- and asked whether any F-94 type aircraft were in the area at or above 30,000 feet. GCI confirmed there were no jet aircraft in the vicinity above 16,000 feet. The encounter lasted approximately 45 seconds total, with the parallel-flight phase lasting approximately 20 seconds. WHAT THE OFFICIAL RECORD ESTABLISHES Several elements of this case were systematically checked and eliminated: No friendly aircraft: GCI confirmed no traffic above 16,000 feet in the area. Pichon himself contacted GCI and received that confirmation in real time. No afterburner: Pichon was specifically alert to this. He noted that F-94 afterburners produce an orange glow that the object distinctly lacked. The color was blue, not orange. He had eight months of experience flying F-94Bs, the same aircraft type he initially wondered about. No balloon: The FEAF comment confirms Rawinsonde balloons are released daily from Itazuke but carry no lights. The Radar Observer's failure to establish contact is notable and cuts both ways. It means no hard technical confirmation of the object. It also means the Radar Observer was actively trying to track the object during the encounter and got nothing -- which is unusual if the object was, say, another aircraft at relatively close range. POINTS OF INTEREST The maneuver profile is what makes this case difficult. The object did not simply hold position or drift. It executed a sequence of course changes: crossing the aircraft's track, reversing, then paralleling. The final parallel phase is particularly striking -- the object matched the F-94's heading of 155 degrees after having been on a different heading and after performing the crossing maneuver. This is a specific, directional outcome. Pichon's reporting of the maneuver in precise angular terms (20 degrees right, 10 degrees left, 3 degrees right) reflects a pilot's trained observational habits. He was not describing a vague light that moved around in the sky -- he was reporting an object whose position relative to his aircraft he tracked with the same attention he would give any aerial contact. The initial dark-object-before-ignition detail deserves attention. Pichon reports seeing a dark object in peripheral vision before it lit up. This means something was there before the "flame" appeared -- it had mass before it had luminescence. Whether this is significant or simply a reflection of the object moving into a position where its luminous aspect became visible is unclear, but it is a detail that resists some of the simpler light-phenomenon explanations. The geographic and strategic context should not be overlooked. This sighting occurred in the Korea Strait in April 1953 -- three months before the armistice. The route between Pusan and Itazuke was a well-traveled military corridor. Unknown maneuvering objects in that airspace, capable of matching the speed and course of a US interceptor, would have had obvious intelligence implications regardless of their origin. Pichon's own credibility is explicitly vouched for by his intelligence officer: "He is a capable all weather fighter- interceptor pilot, and is steady and reliable." He has been in the unit for eight months. He filed his statement the same day the encounter occurred. BOTTOM LINE This is a brief but solid UNIDENTIFIED. The observer is a trained interceptor pilot who tracked the object under clear conditions, compared it against familiar aircraft signatures (specifically the afterburner he knew well), and eliminated the most obvious explanations in real time with GCI assistance. The radar failure to establish contact is a genuine limitation -- it means no independent technical corroboration exists -- but it cannot be taken as evidence against the sighting when the radar was confirmed functioning and was actively employed during the encounter. The maneuver profile -- crossing, reversing, paralleling -- is the core of what makes this case resistant to conventional explanation. Balloons don't do it. Atmospheric phenomena don't do it. And at 1955 local time on 8 April 1953, over the Korea Strait, GCI had nothing on scope. Whatever paralleled Pichon's F-94B at 30,000 feet that night matched his course without a visible propulsion system and went dark when he climbed toward it. ================================================================ END OF DOCUMENT ================================================================ ----------------------------------------------------------------