OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.
— ———— s ———— i = ye ral}
112. CONCLUSIONS
Navlaa Moma pr 8 Yas Balloon
fagles Mere, Penn |0 Probobly Balloon
i mE Eee ww
| 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ———|0 Possibly Balloon
ol T LOCATION
TT ——
= W
Fd pe = =
Y 1, \ I ZOD
| 5. PHOTOS
“TV Eeniim da V1 assml "l Coaunid.D ad as | 0 Was Alreratt {
LX Ground-VYisual [J Ground-Radar |G Probably Aireraft \
aan 1 0 AirVi isval a Air-Intercapt Radar Possibly Aircralr
13 SOURCE Pr. a Yias A stronomi cal
C Tes | 0 Probably Astronomical
2 Neo ~rivi Lian [1 Possibly Astronomical
| 7. LENGTH OF CBSERYATION | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE ~~ |O Other. ______
OF {
c Aone [2 +imaa) tT ob Insufficiant Dote for Evaluation |
5 mina one (3 times) | West lo Unknown
[10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING ie i a Ey RR rT EET Tm.
Za we 1 » | LT | Nothing to indicat
o t an a/c sightl
0f witness
St111 soselhle ae To orbital
ob js have retrograde motion or |
30 min period.
Ro third time 32
Assumed orbital by witness. Less
nan Jupiter. Insists that obj vas
be since he is snglaeer and ex-pilot.
JOX TX.
not a /
Also obsa2rved throuzn
ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP $2)