May 1952 | Albuqueruque, New Mexico
ET - ff HE ] + Ed iF fil ii
is a 1 = ——————7 Cr cm —
BE
- ot LOCATION L
1. DATE
10. tay 52
3 DATE-TIMEGROUP [4 TYPE OF OBS —eeeeeeee
D Ground-Radar
“Ground-Visvel
0 Air v suol
S
GM
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.
7. LENOTH OF OBSERVATION “|'8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | |
ATIC ORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 352)
_ EIT Ere TEE SET Mm mg a pr—m—— mm Tay SRT NR TEE Toe Eh ee
Tz. concLusions
|0 Was Balloon
|D . Probably Balloon
—| GX Possibly Balloon
Wos Aircraft
Probably Aircroft
Possibly Aireraft
[+ FYE OF CO IRRVATION ——
| B- Frm— Visual O Ground-Radar |
le Sessa
Was Astrenomicel |
Probobly Astrenomicel
|
ogo rs ogo
Po ssibly Astronomicol
EEE TENT |
Insufficient Dote for Eveluation | |
Unk no wn
| Civilian
forty minutes ) RE. wo. SEE
BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING wh Tee Eo. Pr ET oh et . COMMENTS
Two round bluish/objects size of : ‘Cause of sighting was possibly a
dime at arm's length, Course of cbjecfs ballcon. Size, shape, color, winc
was from 25 dgr elevation South to direction, course, and duration |
29 dgr elevation Northeast, Objects substantiate this hypothesis, |
arced to 30dgr elevation during flight] The conflicting fact that there
Objects were observed visually & thru| were two objs can be accounted -
binoculars for 40 minutes and disap- | for by the possibility of 2 hal-
peared by fading out of sight. Anoher| loons or that thru binoculars a |
phenomena was reported whih supposedly single balloon light could be mid-
is related to the sighting i.e. an | taken for two balloon lights,
explosion without any noise and sheet| Concluded that "explosion and sidet
of ASS following the explosion, | of light" not related to initial |
= = : | sae. sal shooting rd
BE 11CN _ G
jot pilot