May 1952 | Houston, Texas
oe ——— oo —
| 3. DATETIME GROUP
Loco! ..... 2210 CST
GIT. 2 _OK10 4
| Ee — i - =. = = = SE =
: 5. PHOTOS |
d Yes
JPRS | i No
| 7+ LENGTH OF OBSERVATION
lio. BRIEF SU
GM
May 1952 | Saigon, Indo, China
we EEE EE ESE Pe
-
a = oc
8 sgn ’ ando-hina_
i Tr & Em — = EE EE Sn “iC
w
: 03 0 ens mem Booed Visual
230. le
aw. 0 Ar Yisuol o Air-Intercept Radar
LE — “% RT i 55m i. 2 165 sso Si
GM
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
2. LOCATION |
zai a
0 AireVisuel
8. SOURCE
7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 8. N
| 1
st Wn. XY,
ET
ht tribute ed to object as it diszupeared,
[nesses did not give time for duration of
ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 57)
- ee pie
Drawing Sl avian
Fh cobserved object
wnizn appeared to hover, move to new location
las Re speed, hover again before disappearir
=Dgecs was described as a light bright enougt
[ ight up clouds in &rea. Whining noise was
Witn-
_ | smityville, N.Y.
4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION
Ground- Visual
|
|
O Air-Intercept Rodor O Possibly Aircraft
§ | 9. COURSE
11. COMMENTS |
Witnesses did not
Possible that
afe to have remained visible.
fevent but did indicate changing their positiong
jover a considerable distance while it was |
112. CONCLUSIONS
Wos Ballesn
0 Probably Bolleon
Possibly Balloon
Craund. Bader O Was Aircraft |
D Ground-Raodar O Probebly Aireraft |
O Was Astronomicel
0 Probobly Astrenemicol ‘
D Possibly Astrenemicol
1D Other :
HB Insufficient Data for Evaluation |
O Unknown |
Generally F
rrovide sufficient
onclusion for sighting
t this was an interceptog
"afc with the alterburner operating but
ength of time which was indicated in
€ report would have been too long for
x
info to allow a co
Ae
i