Date Unknown | Near Foster, Kentucky
., •
Date Unknown | Jasper, Alabama
• •
•
Date Unknown | Daly City, California
•
•
Date Unknown | Warren, Ohio
Date Unknown | Spotsylvania, Virginia
• •
•
______________-·--
Date Unknown | Greenville, Ohio
•
•
• •
Date Unknown | Freeport, Illinois
..
\
•
Date Unknown | Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
•
Date Unknown | Ardmore, Alabama
'
•
•
Date Unknown | California
•
Date Unknown | Springfield, Ohio
•
•
Date Unknown | Bellefontaine, Ohio
Date Unknown | St, Louis, Montana
•
Date Unknown | Lima, Ohio
•
'
•
Date Unknown | Kettering, Ohio
•
,
•
•
Date Unknown | Winona, Mississippi
•
•
•• •
. ... • • .. L
•
- , r/-. =
Date Unknown | Columbus, Ohio
•
Date Unknown | Deming, New Mexico
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
•
1. DATE
Date Unknown | Norton, Connecticut
------
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
Date Unknown | Midland, Texas
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
Date Unknown | Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
Date Unknown | Off the Coast of South Carolinaand Georgia
Date Unknown | Islip Terrace, New York
•
Date Unknown | Ft, Walton Beach, Florida
•
Date Unknown | Tripoli, Iowas
•
•
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD •
1. D~TE • TIME GROUP
' 09/2300
2. LOCATION
• • '.. •
_Q Nn v1'~r _ffi 1 rlloL1 •
Nrtr_' .h Mo..rr_ick ~ ew:,_~~:O..w
•ru·lk~---------~
•
3. SOIJRCE
10, CONCLUSION
.Ci vil ' an
Possible Other (GROUND LIGHT)
.4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS
I Thet·e is no r e ason why the observation could not have been
I _OnF> of a gr ound li bht reflecting from the cloud bases .
S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION
11, BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
1 Second
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION