GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
73
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
Date Unknown | Near Foster, Kentucky
14 pp
., •
Date Unknown | Jasper, Alabama
5 pp
• • •
Date Unknown | Daly City, California
10 pp
• •
Date Unknown | Warren, Ohio
21 pp
Date Unknown | Spotsylvania, Virginia
12 pp
• • • ______________-·--
Date Unknown | Greenville, Ohio
13 pp
• • • •
Date Unknown | Freeport, Illinois
4 pp
.. \ •
Date Unknown | Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
7 pp
•
Date Unknown | Ardmore, Alabama
16 pp
' • •
Date Unknown | California
5 pp
•
Date Unknown | Springfield, Ohio
13 pp
• •
Date Unknown | Bellefontaine, Ohio
21 pp
Date Unknown | St, Louis, Montana
11 pp
•
Date Unknown | Lima, Ohio
22 pp
• ' •
Date Unknown | Kettering, Ohio
21 pp
• , • •
Date Unknown | Winona, Mississippi
19 pp
• • •• • . ... • • .. L • - , r/-. =
Date Unknown | Columbus, Ohio
1 pp
•
Date Unknown | Deming, New Mexico
4 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD • 1. DATE
Date Unknown | Norton, Connecticut
23 pp
------ PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
Date Unknown | Midland, Texas
4 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
Date Unknown | Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
7 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
Date Unknown | Off the Coast of South Carolinaand Georgia
28 pp
Date Unknown | Islip Terrace, New York
6 pp
•
Date Unknown | Ft, Walton Beach, Florida
29 pp
•
Date Unknown | Tripoli, Iowas
5 pp
• •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1966-03-8676151-TruaxField-Wisconsin.pdf
LOCATION Truax Field, Wisconsin
DATE March 1966
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8676151
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 6
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. . '• - . / ,... I • • • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD • ' • I. OA TE • TIME GROUP 2. LOCATION - 25 ~~r 66 25/l0l5Z Truax Field, Wisconsin 3. SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION Military INSUFFICIENT DATA 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS <he S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 40-45 Minutes Very poor report. Ground visual portion ot j;he sighting 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION is carried as lNSUFFICil'..:NT DATA because thB report was called 1n to Traux Field arxl the name and address ot the Grd, Vis- RADAR witnesses was not re ported. Also other essential data 7. COURSE was missing. The radar portion ot the sighting is carried. as INSUFFICIENT DATA b"eauee no scope photos were available Not Reported 8. PHOTOS tor analysis. ''· .. • 0 Yes XX No 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE •