GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
February 1952 | Elpaso, Texas
16 pp
February 1952 | Northkorea
9 pp
, . • • • -
February 1952 | Cambellscreek, Nfd
3 pp
March 1952 | Goose AFB, Labrador
MILITARY 3 pp
March 1952 | Nationalcity, California
9 pp
• ., •
March 1952 | Atlantic
Insufficient Data Military 3 pp
March 1952 | Seaof Japan
1 pp
March 1952 | Seaofjapan 33 Degrees 53 N, 130 Degrees 40 E
2 pp
• , . • •
March 1952 | Betweenclaremore and Tulsa, Oklahoma
1 pp
• ' • •• • • •
March 1952 | Between Clarmore and Tulsa, Oklahoma
4 pp
• • • : ----
March 1952 | Pacific Ocean
5 pp
March 1952 | Koflavik, Iceland
12 pp
March 1952 | Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft 4 pp
• ' •
March 1952 | Albuquerque, New Mexico
Balloon Military 1 pp
• • ·-. • ' .- • •
March 1952 | Location Illegible
48 pp
March 1952 | Centerville, Queenannescounty, Maryland
4 pp
• • • • •
March 1952 | Brentwood, Maryland
1 pp
• •
March 1952 | Brentwood, Maryland
7 pp
• • I
March 1952 | 60 Mileswest Point Conception, California
5 pp
• •
March 1952 | San Diego, California
17 pp
• • -· ·- - -
March 1952 | Ft, Stockton, Texas | Incident #1079
Aircraft INCIDENT #1079 Military (Radar) 2 pp
• • • File 1079 March 26 , 1952 Ft. Stockton, T
April 1952 | Internal Document
46 pp
1 APRIL 1952 ATIC UFO BRIEFll~G 7·3745 - J K I \ •
April 1952 | Richmond, California
10 pp
April 1952 | NW of Moody AFB, Georgia
MILITARY 9 pp
• •
April 1952 | Washington, Indiana
Other (Contrails) 6 pp
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1949-06-6309416-Osborn-Ohio-376-.pdf
LOCATION Osborn, Ohio
DATE June 1949
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 6309416
DECADE 1940s
TYPE Sighting
INCIDENT #376
PAGES 9
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • I • • • • I • • • - --------------~====~~- .. . - ----- . .. . . .. PROJECT 10073 RECORD I. DAn: • TIME GROUP 2. CATION • J7b ::8 June 1949 30/013n) Osbom, Ohio ~ SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION Civilian Other (BIRDS) [ '· NUMBER OF OBJECTS • 1 One Pbserversestimation ot distance fran witness was evidentally off. ; 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS I! 3 - 4 Seconds 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Object appeared to be l.:lrger than F-90. Aluminum. Object ha appeared as a conventio