GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
April 1969 | Dallas, Texas
Insufficient Data Civilian 77 pp
May 1969 | Allentown, Pennsylvania
17 pp
May 1969 | NE of Dayton, Ohio
15 pp
May 1969 | South Berwick, Maine
11 pp
May 1969 | Pine Ridge, South Dakota
6 pp
May 1969 | Near Pikesville, Kentucky
1 pp
May 1969 | Newyork, Newyork
10 pp
• •, ...- . _......_ _ _ _ _ _........................._.....,________. •
June 1969 | Illinois, Iowa Area
16 pp
• .. ' , .
June 1969 | Westcarrollton, Ohio
9 pp
• •
June 1969 | Dayton, Ohio
3 pp
• ..
June 1969 | Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Area
69 pp
• • ' •
June 1969 | New Richmond, Ohio
10 pp
• •
June 1969 | Kettering, Ohio
27 pp
June 1969 | Jacksonville, Florida
17 pp
June 1969 | Fort Myer, Virginia
11 pp
• ' . •
July 1969 | Kettering, Ohio
27 pp
• , • • f
July 1969 | Cincinnati, Ohio
11 pp
• ..
July 1969 | Castlewood, Virginia
10 pp
I .. - ~ .... .- ... ""' _
July 1969 | Dayton, Ohio
9 pp
, • •
July 1969 | Near Johnsonburg, Pennsylvania
14 pp
• p;~OJECT 10073 RECORD • \
July 1969 | Denver, Colorado
26 pp
• ' • P ~rllJECT 1C073 RECORD . ~------~ --~----~----~--~-----------------
August 1969 | Dayton, Ohio
Astro (Other) Civilian 48 pp
• • • • ~
August 1969 | Kettering, Ohio
Balloon Civilian 22 pp
• • •
August 1969 | Ohio, Kentucky, West Virginia Area
Astro (Meteor) Multiple 138 pp
• •
August 1969 | Riverdale, New York
Insufficient Data Civilian 4 pp
• •• l .--------~·--------------~------------------------------------------~ ~·--~---w~--------~
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-09-7279438-SaltLakeCity-Utah.pdf
LOCATION Salt Lake City, Utah
DATE September 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 7279438
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 14
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • __ _________,________________________________ ,..:.·: ...._ ,, __ P ROJECT 100/ 3 RE COR D .__, , ~ 11. D.~ Hi • ,·...... E GR OUP 2. LOCATION /l(12"( I :; I I i __22.._~<:i~67 26/0410Z Salt l.ake Ci ty, utah (2 \'li tno sses ) j 3. :}0Uf~Ct:: •· 10. CON CLUSION - - .. ,.. .. 1_ -= i vil i a n C::: Probabl e , (AIRCRAFT') 4. NUMBE R OF OBJECTS There i s nothing to indicate t~at the object could not have bu ~ a satellite or an aircraft with its landing lights on, but b9ca~~ One o-r the direction of tra vel it is most li kely to have h e An An A/C'I~ 5. LENGTH Or OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALY SIS '