February 1969 | Shingel Spring, California
• •
February 1969 | Columbus, Ohio
•
February 1969 | Marengo, Indiana
•
,
I
February 1969 | Virginia Beach, Virginia
'
February 1969 | Auburn, New York
••
-
February 1969 | Fairfax, Virginia
··~
February 1969 | Natrona, Pennsylvania
•
t I
February 1969 | Kettering, Ohio
••
•
February 1969 | Dayton, Ohio
•
•
February 1969 | St, Louis, Missouri
March 1969 | Illinois, Ohio
•
March 1969 | New Carlisle, Ohio
•
March 1969 | Fall River, Massachusetts
•
March 1969 | Davenport, Iowa
March 1969 | Silver Spring, Maryland
PnOJECT 10073 RECORD • l
March 1969 | Billings, Oklahoma
•
•
March 1969 | Dayton, Ohio
•
· -
March 1969 | Benton, Illinois
•
April 1969 | Cincinatti, Ohio
•
April 1969 | Dayton, Ohio
•
•
April 1969 | Mc Clellan AFB, California
April 1969 | Joppatowne, Maryland
•
•
April 1969 | Ruston, Louisiana
•
•
April 1969 | Highland Park, New Jersey
•
April 1969 | St, Clair, Pennsylvania
•
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. , •
PROJ2 CT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE - TIME GROUP 2. LOC ATION
lJul or Aug 1968
~ i me is conflictin rr.ul t
'
3. SO\JRCE lO. CONCLUS ION •• I
OTHER : CONFLICTI NG DATA
I
a _n__ ·--------------~ A AF For~ 117 was sent ~o the observer , the date of the observa-
c ivi_l_i_
I
4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS tion as give n on the form was listed as 8 Aug 68 . Again it '
was of a moving star - li ke obj . The sighting (or si~~tings) eppea
l
5. LENGTH OF OBSERVAT ION 11. BRIE F SUMMA RY AND ANAL YSIS a nd time of t he sighting t he case is ••
· being carr ied as CONFLICTI NG DATA . •
se e case
I
6 . T Y P E OF OBSERVATI ON
The observe r r eported t o ·. the Duty Office r that on 8 July 1968
~,t'ound v i s ua l