January 1969 | Sacramento, California
•
January 1969 | Norfolk, Virginia
I
•
January 1969 | Dayton, Ohio
•
January 1969 | Germantown, Ohio
•
,
January 1969 | Kettering, Ohio
---------------- · -----------~----------------------~--------- --~--------------------------------
January 1969 | Covington, Ohio
•
January 1969 | Garwood, New Jersey
• •
January 1969 | Bradenton, Florida
•
•
" ., ... I I
January 1969 | Crittenden, Virginia
•
., J
January 1969 | Los Alamos, New Mexico
·~
•
•
January 1969 | Near Andrews, South Carolina
•
January 1969 | Columbus, Ohio
•
•
•
January 1969 | Indiana Area
•
• •
•
January 1969 | Boydton, Virginia
•
•
•
February 1969 | Pine Bluff, Arkansas
•
• , •
February 1969 | Belridge, Missouri
' t •
February 1969 | Vandalia, Ohio
• •
February 1969 | Dallastown, Pennsylvania
•
...
f
February 1969 | Clifton, Ohio
• I
February 1969 | Twinsburg, Ohio
•
February 1969 | Springfield, Ohio
• t
I
I
•
February 1969 | Hamburg, New York | Incident #12615
File 1~615
February 1969
'iamburr., NP-w York
5 photns
February 1969 | Hamburg, New York
•
•
I
February 1969 | Miamisburg, Ohio
•
\
•
February 1969 | Grosse Ile, Michigan
•
.
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
I
•
- - -
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE • TiME GR OUP 2. LOCATION I ., •
1930 local
20 Dec 6721/00302 ~entnor , New Jersey 1
3. SOURCE 10. CONCLU SION
civilian PHOTO: Insufficient Data for Evaluation - original negatives
not received
.t. NUMBER OF OBJECTS pel-
not stated The original ne gatives we re r eque sted but we re never rece i ved
5. L ENGTH OF OBSER VATION 11. BRIE F SUMMARY AHO .l.NALY SI S
six second exposure Observer was photogr aphing the stars . On a developed
~--------------------~ print he noticed several light images that he could not
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION identify (the lights we r e not observed visually)
photo (not visual) I
7. COURSE
not stated
8. PHOTOS
~ Yo • Orig negs not
o N:. r ecvd I
I
9. ? HYSICA L EVI OENCE