GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
November 1968 | Hazelwood, Missouri
97 pp
November 1968 | Acton, Texas
23 pp
December 1968 | Memphis, Tennessee
17 pp
December 1968 | Greenfield, Iowa
8 pp
December 1968 | Helena, Arkansas
20 pp
December 1968 | Bellefontaine, Ohio
4 pp
.------------,---------------------. 1. t> ATE • TIME GROUP 05/ 20 .J - -· - ----.,
December 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
9 pp
• t" o.UJ t:l-
December 1968 | Centerville, Ohio
10 pp
December 1968 | Near Clayton, Alabama
11 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
December 1968 | Germantown, Tennessee
10 pp
i! • PROJECT 10013 RECORD
December 1968 | Iowa City, Iowa
21 pp
2. LICATIGM •
December 1968 | Palmyra, Michigan
10 pp
t h.UJL\... 1 , •- 1 .l Rl \...ur\ v r------ -------,..-------------------
December 1968 | Morgantown, West Virginia
9 pp
• ,. ROJEC T ,;; n ~
December 1968 | Williams, Minnesota
5 pp
• PROJECT 1007 3 RECOR
December 1968 | Saratoga, California
12 pp
•• Dl.'lf • T.._ ~ l '· 23/lP _(J
December 1968 | Manchester, Pennsylvania
5 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD 11. - ------~------------T-------------------
December 1968 | Natrona, Pennsylvania
9 pp
December 1968 | New Carlisle, Indiana
141 pp
1969 (month unknown) | Davenport, Iowa
6 pp
January 1969 | Coolville, Ohio | Incident #12595
INCIDENT #12595 4 pp
• File 12595 January 19;9 Coolville , Ohio 5 photos •
January 1969 | Cleveland, Ohio
9 pp
.' . I I PROJECT 10073 RECO
January 1969 | Coolville, Ohio
10 pp
• •• PROJECT 10073
January 1969 | Near Greenville, Ohio
20 pp
• I •
January 1969 | Cupertino, California
9 pp
• • ' • •
January 1969 | Memphis, Tennessee
18 pp
.. .. • •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1968-07-7199902-KINGSVILLE-OHIO.pdf
LOCATION Kingsville, Ohio
DATE July 1968
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 7199902
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 10
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. PROJECT 10873 RECORD --~- 11. Dt- TE · -----------------~--------------------------------------------------- : TIM:: GROU? 2. TIO N - · --------- LO CI~ h ···· · v ;o : ,~ vu~-- (..X) j. ;.~ ~ ,. '")'- .~C '-m ~·ll-J. 4 v"'l.':l,b" Z Or:IO 2 i 3. SJUf:CE 10. CONCLUSION I •I ~.,.\,- ':' -',. o..J .J_ J. - ....._.: "\ J. .. l ·-----------------------~ j -1. NUM3ER OF OaJECTS Tne o~.:>e:-vr:.tion could. nave been of an airplane o r a satellit.:: . I ·~ ·.:o.::: :f)::-obably a re'-rograd.e satellite . 5. LENGTH OF OBSeRVATION 11 . BR I EF SWiJ~AR Y AND ANALYSIS - 1 . )2 r7u.ns Tr.e obse rve r sighte d a •..rhi te star- li ke light that traveled on }-------__;·:..__ _ _ __ --i a 1\',·! course • 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION 7. COURSE -.. ., ' r J, f • 1 8. PHOTOS D Yo3 .0 l'lo 9. PHYSICAL E V IDENCE 0 Yos {