GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
November 1968 | Hazelwood, Missouri
97 pp
November 1968 | Acton, Texas
23 pp
December 1968 | Memphis, Tennessee
17 pp
December 1968 | Greenfield, Iowa
8 pp
December 1968 | Helena, Arkansas
20 pp
December 1968 | Bellefontaine, Ohio
4 pp
.------------,---------------------. 1. t> ATE • TIME GROUP 05/ 20 .J - -· - ----.,
December 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
9 pp
• t" o.UJ t:l-
December 1968 | Centerville, Ohio
10 pp
December 1968 | Near Clayton, Alabama
11 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
December 1968 | Germantown, Tennessee
10 pp
i! • PROJECT 10013 RECORD
December 1968 | Iowa City, Iowa
21 pp
2. LICATIGM •
December 1968 | Palmyra, Michigan
10 pp
t h.UJL\... 1 , •- 1 .l Rl \...ur\ v r------ -------,..-------------------
December 1968 | Morgantown, West Virginia
9 pp
• ,. ROJEC T ,;; n ~
December 1968 | Williams, Minnesota
5 pp
• PROJECT 1007 3 RECOR
December 1968 | Saratoga, California
12 pp
•• Dl.'lf • T.._ ~ l '· 23/lP _(J
December 1968 | Manchester, Pennsylvania
5 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD 11. - ------~------------T-------------------
December 1968 | Natrona, Pennsylvania
9 pp
December 1968 | New Carlisle, Indiana
141 pp
1969 (month unknown) | Davenport, Iowa
6 pp
January 1969 | Coolville, Ohio | Incident #12595
INCIDENT #12595 4 pp
• File 12595 January 19;9 Coolville , Ohio 5 photos •
January 1969 | Cleveland, Ohio
9 pp
.' . I I PROJECT 10073 RECO
January 1969 | Coolville, Ohio
10 pp
• •• PROJECT 10073
January 1969 | Near Greenville, Ohio
20 pp
• I •
January 1969 | Cupertino, California
9 pp
• • ' • •
January 1969 | Memphis, Tennessee
18 pp
.. .. • •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-02-8550110-Schenectady-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Schenectady, New York
DATE February 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8550110
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 10
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD co I • !)A -E · T I'.\E GROUP 2. LOCAT IO N !--~:_o__ 67__________________+-_____s_~_-_~_e_~_e~~~·_~_a_d~y~,~:_:_e_.._·_Y_o__r k________________________l__~_~_i_t_n_e_s__s__________~ 3. :. ~I Ji C'!: 10. CONC LUSION . 1 -. -- '-'- -. .,---- - .. ------------------~ ;;... :r.s~~fici en t datq for evaluation I I. 1-I:!I ' C'.E R OF OBJECTS • 11. BRIEF SU.'-ri.MARY AND AN ALYSIS 3 ~ inute s Object. had a :!or.le ?.t th~ top a nd a r ound. li~ht i."1t h3 I{.. 1 f ?E OF OBSERVATION f r or.t . The li6ht ch!lnged f r o:n r eddis~ or .:jnge t~1~:1 to g~een . ~he observer stated tha t the ob jec t hov er ed, Ir:;- ~ .r~ ~·.,...,.. o,J ~- • - ,-.;- ·=-· ·1 - _ l.. swooJ:ed do·,.m bahind t r ees, and zoomed a•r;::...y • . ·.. it!1out 7.