October 1968 | Lake Michigan
•
October 1968 | Manchester, New Hampshire
• •
•
•
•
P~OJECT 10073 RECORD
November 1968 | Acton, Texas | Incident #12563
Fi e 1?563
~ovP.mber 19, 196°
Acton , Texaa
9 photos
November 1968 | Iceland | Incident #12593
!'"'ile 12593
November '30 , 1ors
Ice] and
1 photos
November 1968 | Pronx, New York
November 1968 | Bronx, New York
•
•
•
•
I 3. D ID THE PHE N O M ENO N
November 1968 | 124, 5 W 36, 5 N
November 1968 | North Merrick, New York
P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD
November 1968 | Fallon, Nevada
November 1968 | Arcanum, Ohio
P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD
November 1968 | Sommerville, Ohio
~D~T£ · f~!=O~~~,~l~9-J_0__1r.2~.~l~OC~AT~I~OH~---------------------------~--~.~---------, PROJECT J0073 RECORD
l
November 1968 | Duluth, Minnesota
• •
P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE • TIME GROUP
November 1968 | Memphis, Tennessee
------ --------
November 1968 | Bridgeport, Ohio
November 1968 | Near Waterloo, Illinois
November 1968 | Hickory, North Carolina
'· ---------------~--------------~----------------~------------------------~,-~~--~_.~~--------~
DA TE • TIME CROUP
November 1968 | Memphis, Tennesse
•
1'· ,,. u ......, 2. LICATION
November 1968 | Silver Bay, Minnesota
•
• P ~
November 1968 | Fairfield, California
• •
P;:OJECT 10073
November 1968 | Newton, Georgia
•
Pi.OJECT 10073 RECORD
~~·~--~-------------------r-------------~~~~--~~~~~------------------------
November 1968 | Collinsville, Illinois
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
~------------, -----
November 1968 | Bismark, North Dakota
•
November 1968 | Cassopolis, Michigan
November 1968 | Brattleboro, Vermont
1. OA TE • TIME CROUP
November 1968 | Ontario California
~----------~
. ------~---------
p-;,o_;_e_c_r_J_oo_7_J_R_e_c_
o_Ro_______
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
I
•
- - -
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE • TiME GR OUP 2. LOCATION I ., •
1930 local
20 Dec 6721/00302 ~entnor , New Jersey 1
3. SOURCE 10. CONCLU SION
civilian PHOTO: Insufficient Data for Evaluation - original negatives
not received
.t. NUMBER OF OBJECTS pel-
not stated The original ne gatives we re r eque sted but we re never rece i ved
5. L ENGTH OF OBSER VATION 11. BRIE F SUMMARY AHO .l.NALY SI S
six second exposure Observer was photogr aphing the stars . On a developed
~--------------------~ print he noticed several light images that he could not
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION identify (the lights we r e not observed visually)
photo (not visual) I
7. COURSE
not stated
8. PHOTOS
~ Yo • Orig negs not
o N:. r ecvd I
I
9. ? HYSICA L EVI OENCE