October 1968 | Lake Michigan
•
October 1968 | Manchester, New Hampshire
• •
•
•
•
P~OJECT 10073 RECORD
November 1968 | Acton, Texas | Incident #12563
Fi e 1?563
~ovP.mber 19, 196°
Acton , Texaa
9 photos
November 1968 | Iceland | Incident #12593
!'"'ile 12593
November '30 , 1ors
Ice] and
1 photos
November 1968 | Pronx, New York
November 1968 | Bronx, New York
•
•
•
•
I 3. D ID THE PHE N O M ENO N
November 1968 | 124, 5 W 36, 5 N
November 1968 | North Merrick, New York
P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD
November 1968 | Fallon, Nevada
November 1968 | Arcanum, Ohio
P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD
November 1968 | Sommerville, Ohio
~D~T£ · f~!=O~~~,~l~9-J_0__1r.2~.~l~OC~AT~I~OH~---------------------------~--~.~---------, PROJECT J0073 RECORD
l
November 1968 | Duluth, Minnesota
• •
P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE • TIME GROUP
November 1968 | Memphis, Tennessee
------ --------
November 1968 | Bridgeport, Ohio
November 1968 | Near Waterloo, Illinois
November 1968 | Hickory, North Carolina
'· ---------------~--------------~----------------~------------------------~,-~~--~_.~~--------~
DA TE • TIME CROUP
November 1968 | Memphis, Tennesse
•
1'· ,,. u ......, 2. LICATION
November 1968 | Silver Bay, Minnesota
•
• P ~
November 1968 | Fairfield, California
• •
P;:OJECT 10073
November 1968 | Newton, Georgia
•
Pi.OJECT 10073 RECORD
~~·~--~-------------------r-------------~~~~--~~~~~------------------------
November 1968 | Collinsville, Illinois
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
~------------, -----
November 1968 | Bismark, North Dakota
•
November 1968 | Cassopolis, Michigan
November 1968 | Brattleboro, Vermont
1. OA TE • TIME CROUP
November 1968 | Ontario California
~----------~
. ------~---------
p-;,o_;_e_c_r_J_oo_7_J_R_e_c_
o_Ro_______
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
__ _________,________________________________
,..:.·: ...._ ,, __ P ROJECT 100/ 3 RE COR D .__,
, ~
11. D.~ Hi • ,·...... E GR OUP 2. LOCATION /l(12"( I
:; I I
i __22.._~<:i~67 26/0410Z Salt l.ake Ci ty, utah (2 \'li tno sses )
j 3. :}0Uf~Ct:: •· 10. CON CLUSION - - .. ,.. ..
1_ -= i vil i a n
C::: Probabl e , (AIRCRAFT')
4. NUMBE R OF OBJECTS There i s nothing to indicate t~at the object could not have bu ~
a satellite or an aircraft with its landing lights on, but b9ca~~
One o-r the direction of tra vel it is most li kely to have h e An An A/C'I~
5. LENGTH Or OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALY SIS
'