OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
l PROJECT 10073 RECOI~D CARD ,
1. DATE 2. lOCATIO N 12. CONCL USIONS
fJ Ylos Oolloon
1 .T:1uua ry 19 5 5 _ ~O_ }I:!:_ ~ _J;o £11 !.§.~ ,,---'N-~w M~&i G.Q_ ~ P rubobl y Dolloo n
-3.-DAT - -· --·-- ------ -
- E·-TIME GROUP 4 . IY PE OF OBSERVAT I ON
Possibly Holloon
0 Wos Ai rcr a ft
Loco l _ __ _ _ ,_ -·-----· 0 Groo.. n d- Vi suo I rJ GrCJVIf U· Rodo r
0 P robobly Aircraft
Gli. -riQ
-=---=:-:=
1L
I '-_...::
-
l3 "..t
-
1 •'7.
/1 .... I -·=====::.:.::::=:.
- ---
.. - ... __ 6. :N_SUURCE
I.X A__i r· V_i r.u ol 0 A ir- Inte r cep t R<•dar
================================================================
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION
File: 1955-01-6965163-30MiECochise-NewMexico.pdf
Transcribed from document image by Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
FIELD 1 -- DATE: 1 January 1955
FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: 30 Mi E Cochise, New Mexico
[Note: Cochise is a community in Cochise County, Arizona.
30 miles east of Cochise, AZ places this sighting over
the border region of extreme southwestern New Mexico,
in the vicinity of the Peloncillo Mountains or the
Lordsburg/Animas area.]
FIELD 3 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: Local [blank] / GMT 01/1344Z
[Note: New Mexico observes Mountain Standard Time (UTC-7)
in January. 1344Z converts to approximately 0644 MST --
pre-dawn or early nautical twilight on New Year's Day.
Civil twilight in southern New Mexico at this date is
approximately 0700 MST; at flight altitude the sky
lightens somewhat earlier.]
FIELD 4 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION: Ground-Visual [ ]
Ground-Radar [ ]
Air-Visual [XX]
Air-Intercept Radar [ ]
FIELD 5 -- PHOTOS: No [X]
FIELD 6 -- SOURCE: Military pilot instructor
FIELD 7 -- LENGTH OF OBS: 5-7 minutes
FIELD 8 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: one
FIELD 9 -- COURSE: ESE to WNW
FIELD 10 -- BRIEF SUMMARY:
Military pilot flying in B-25 a/c as instructor, turned
to student & first saw object which he described as large
(120-130 feet across) metallic, disc shape, looked like
two pie tins placed together at their rims. During time
of sighting, object changed its position to both face and
observer's a/c with both its edge forward, and w/its
circular surface exposed to view. Object paralleled
aircraft and disappeared after approx 7 minutes.
FIELD 11 -- COMMENTS:
ATIC Form 164 sent to observer but no further
investigation directed.
(No Report in File)
FIELD 12 -- CONCLUSIONS: Unknown [X]
Form: ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 52)
[Single-page file. No supplemental documents present.
ATIC Form 164 (the witness questionnaire) was mailed to
the observer but is not included in this file; the
comments note "No Report in File," indicating either the
form was not returned or the response is absent from
the record.]
================================================================
SEARCH INDEX TERMS
================================================================
Cochise Arizona New Mexico border southwestern New Mexico
Peloncillo Mountains Lordsburg Animas 1955 January New Year
B-25 Mitchell bomber trainer military pilot instructor student
two observers air-visual metallic disc lenticular shape two pie
tins circular large 120 feet 130 feet size estimate orientation
change edge-on face-on paralleled aircraft unknown pre-dawn
dawn twilight 0644 MST 1344Z ESE WNW course maneuvering
no report in file ATIC Form 164 no investigation disc shape
classic saucer shape military flight training instructor pilot
================================================================
CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION
The case is carried as Unknown -- specifically the Unknown
checkbox, as distinct from Other UNIDENTIFIED. In Blue Book
practice this distinction matters: UNIDENTIFIED generally
meant investigators had sufficient data to evaluate and still
could not explain the object, while Unknown often indicated
incomplete data. The comment field here confirms the gap:
"No Report in File." The ATIC Form 164 questionnaire was
mailed to the observer and not returned, or the return is
not present in this file. No further investigation was
directed. The Unknown classification reflects what they had,
not what they concluded about it.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS
The primary observer was a military pilot instructor flying
a B-25 Mitchell on what appears to have been a training
flight. He turned to address his student and at that moment
first saw the object -- meaning the student was also present
and presumably observed it as well, though no separate
student account exists in this file.
The description recorded on the card is specific: one
object, 120 to 130 feet across, metallic, disc-shaped, its
appearance comparable to two pie tins placed together at
their rims. That image is precise -- it describes a
lenticular form, widest at the equator, tapering to a
defined edge. The instructor knew what aircraft look like.
A B-25 wingspan is 67 feet; the instructor estimated the
object at nearly twice that, and appears to have made that
estimate with some confidence.
During the approximately five to seven minutes of the
sighting the object changed its orientation, presenting
both its edge profile and its circular face to the
observers. It then paralleled the aircraft before
disappearing. Course was ESE to WNW.
The timing was early: 1344Z on January 1 converts to
approximately 0644 Mountain Standard Time, placing the
sighting in nautical twilight or very early morning
conditions over southwestern New Mexico. At altitude the
sky lightens before civil twilight at ground level, so
visibility from the cockpit may have been better than the
time implies. In any case the observer described what he
saw in terms that require good visual conditions -- metallic
surface, disc contour, edge versus face orientation. He was
seeing the object clearly enough to characterize it in
structural terms.
POINTS OF INTEREST -- WHAT GIVES ME PAUSE
The size estimate of 120-130 feet is the most compelling
single detail. Military pilots calibrate size estimates
against familiar references. This instructor was sitting
in a twin-engine aircraft he knew intimately. His estimate
of roughly twice a B-25 wingspan is not an offhand guess;
it is a trained observer making a comparison against a
known standard. For the object to be that large and still
appear disc-shaped with a clean lenticular profile rules
out most small or ambiguous phenomena.
The orientation changes deserve attention. The object
shifted from presenting its edge to presenting its full
circular face, then back. This is not what a balloon does,
not what a cloud does, and not what a distant aircraft does
in normal flight. A tumbling object would produce irregular,
inconsistent aspect changes. The description implies a
controlled shift from one orientation to another -- the
object presenting itself differently to the observers at
different moments.
The paralleling behavior is the second active element.
The object flew alongside the B-25 before departing. Like
the Guam case, this is not a passive fly-by -- it is
relative motion maintained with respect to the observing
aircraft.
The location adds quiet context. Southwestern New Mexico
in January 1955 is remote high desert, not far from the
White Sands Missile Range complex and the testing ranges
that dominated that corner of the country in that era.
Unusual aerial objects over this region carried more
potential explanations than they would elsewhere -- but an
experimental craft of those dimensions, with that behavior,
paralleling a training aircraft before departing, does not
fit the profile of a test vehicle operating normally.
The absence of any follow-up investigation is the most
frustrating element. A military instructor pilot with a
student aboard, in daylight-approaching conditions, watching
a large metallic disc-shaped object maneuver alongside his
aircraft for up to seven minutes -- this warranted more
than mailing a questionnaire and directing no further
inquiry. What the instructor would have written on that
Form 164, had he returned it, is the question this file
cannot answer.
BOTTOM LINE
The observer is credible and the description is specific.
The size estimate, the structural detail, the orientation
changes, and the paralleling behavior together describe
something that does not reduce to any conventional
explanation available to a 1955 analyst. The Unknown
classification is the correct result given the data deficit,
but the data deficit was partly institutional -- no
follow-up was directed, and whatever the instructor wrote
on the questionnaire (if he wrote anything) is gone.
This case is small on paper and large on what it implies.
A military instructor pilot over New Mexico in early
January 1955 watched something the size of a large aircraft,
shaped like nothing in any known inventory, fly alongside
him for several minutes and then depart. The record card
is all we have.
================================================================
END OF DOCUMENT
================================================================