OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
•
•
•
• • ., - .. • \
, •
I
' PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
•
1. DATE .. 2. LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS
0 Was Balloon
2 0 Probably Balloon
0 Possibly Balloon
3. DATE•TIME GROUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION
0 Wos Aircrah
, Locol - ?.000 1;1;: Qround- Visual 0 Graund· Rodar Probably Aircraft
0
================================================================
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION
File: 1957-09-7228815-KadenaAFB-Okinawa.pdf
Transcribed by Claude Sonnet 4.6 for GlitchyMatrix.com/bluebook/
================================================================
FIELD 1 -- DATE: 20 September 1957
FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: Kadena, AFB, Okinawa
FIELD 3 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: Local 2000 / GMT 20/1105Z
FIELD 4 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION:
Ground-Visual [X]
Ground-Radar [ ]
Air-Visual [ ]
Air-Intercept Radar [ ]
FIELD 5 -- PHOTOS: No
FIELD 6 -- SOURCE: Military
FIELD 7 -- LENGTH OF OBS: 5 to 10 seconds
[Note: per-pass duration; total event spanned
approx. 14 minutes across four discrete passes.]
FIELD 8 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: one
FIELD 9 -- COURSE: N to S
FIELD 10 -- BRIEF SUMMARY:
Oval shaped object which glowed like a fluorescent light.
The object seemed indented (like a coke bottle without a
top). The object was slightly bigger than a grapefruit.
Seemed to vibrate. Gave the impression of translucence.
It made four passes from N to S remaining visible approx
5 to 10 sec each time. No sound.
FIELD 11 -- COMMENTS:
Possibility that object was a kite or balloon - based on
previous reports - but will carry as unknown pending
receipt of further information.
FIELD 12 -- CONCLUSIONS:
[ ] Was balloon
[ ] Probably balloon
[ ] Possibly balloon
[ ] Was aircraft
[ ] Probably aircraft
[ ] Possibly aircraft
[ ] Was astronomical
[ ] Probably astronomical
[ ] Possibly astronomical
[X] Other: UNIDENTIFIED
[Note: "UNIDENTIFIED" appears handwritten into the
Other field. This version of the ATIC 329 form does
not carry a separate Unidentified checkbox distinct
from "Unknown" at the base of the Field 12 list.]
[ ] Insufficient data for evaluation
[ ] Unidentified
Form: ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 52)
[Note: Record card appears twice in the PDF -- original and
what appears to be a duplicate/carbon copy. Content is
identical on both copies.]
Supplemental documents present:
Air Intelligence Information Report (AIIR), Report No. IR 1-57
HQ 313TH ADIV, INTELLIGENCE, APO 239
On AF Form 112 and Supplement to AF Form 112, 4 pages total
Primary sources: S/SGT HUGH T. O'CONNOR, S/SGT HILLIS D.
BRIDGMAN, 13th Communications Squadron, Kadena AFB
Supplemental source: S/SGT THOMAS M. GILLIGAN (brief sighting,
deemed unusable by preparing officer)
Preparing Officer: 1/LT JAMES W. WALLACE, AO 2224028,
Hq 313th Air Division, APO 239, Intelligence Officer
Reviewing Authority: JAMES F. GIDDENS, Lt Colonel, USAF,
Chief, Intelligence Division, Directorate of Operations
Date of Report: 30 Sept 1957
Date stamp: OCT 29 1957
Distribution: 1 Cy CINCPACAF, 1 Cy DCS/I, 5AF
Includes: rough observer azimuth/geometry sketch; marginal
handwritten annotations from reviewing authority (partially
legible; discussed in analysis below)
================================================================
SEARCH INDEX TERMS
================================================================
Kadena Kadena-AFB Okinawa Ryukyus Japan 1957 September 1950s
military communications-squadron ground-visual oval fluorescent
translucent glowing vibrating jellyfish coke-bottle grapefruit
night overcast four-passes repeated-passes five-minute-interval
N-to-S silent no-sound UNIDENTIFIED 13th-Communications-Squadron
CINCPACAF 5AF 313th-ADIV intelligence-report IR-1-57 kite balloon
elevation-angle azimuth multiple-witnesses trained-observer
AF-Form-112 Bridgman O'Connor Wallace Giddens barracks-110
================================================================
CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION
-----------------------
The ATIC Record Card carries "UNIDENTIFIED" handwritten into
the Other field of Field 12. The Field 11 comments are more
tentative: the investigator raises the possibility of a kite
or balloon "based on previous reports" but declines to commit,
carrying the case as unknown pending further information that
apparently never materialized. The Air Intelligence Information
Report's preparing officer, 1/Lt James W. Wallace (313th ADIV
Intelligence Officer), is more direct in his AIIR Section 11b
comments: "Due to the unusual number of sightings (four), and
the regularity in the time element, I am unable to determine
any known cause or explanation thereof." Marginal annotations
from what appears to be a higher-level reviewing authority --
the document bears a countersignature block associated with
Lt Colonel James F. Giddens, Chief, Intelligence Division,
Directorate of Operations -- push toward a kite explanation
by reference to similar Pacific cases in Air Intelligence
Command records but acknowledge that no ground verification
was performed for this specific incident.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS
-----------------------
Two primary witnesses -- S/Sgts O'Connor and Bridgman of the
13th Communications Squadron -- observed the object from the
veranda between the wings of Barracks 110, Kadena Air Base,
approximately 1600 yards at a 165-degree azimuth from the Base
Operations Tower. The AIIR notes both men appeared sincere and
positive in the information they provided. Observer coordinates
given as 26 degrees 21'N / 127 degrees 47'E.
The object made four discrete passes in a generally N-to-S
direction at approximately 5-minute intervals. Precise GMT
observation times from the AIIR: 201105Z, 201110Z, 201115Z,
and 201119Z. Each pass lasted 4-10 seconds, with the object
disappearing into the overcast each time. Field 7 on the ATIC
form records "5 to 10 seconds," which represents the per-pass
duration; the total event spanned roughly 14 minutes.
The four passes were not identical in behavior. On the first,
the object traveled level in a distinct arc. Passes two and
three were level with a straight course rather than an arc.
On the fourth and final pass, the object came directly overhead
at an elevation angle of 60 degrees (versus 45 degrees on the
preceding passes) and seemed to gain altitude before
disappearing into cloud cover. Size, shape, and speed remained
constant across all four passes.
The primary azimuth data from the AIIR: object first sighted
by O'Connor at azimuth 350 degrees, elevation 45 degrees.
Bridgman's first observed azimuth was 25 degrees at 45 degrees
elevation. Second sighting (both observers together): azimuth
10 degrees, elevation 45 degrees. Third pass: north-south
track, elevation 45 degrees, azimuth not definite. Fourth
pass: elevation 60 degrees, azimuth 350 degrees, passing
overhead, climbing; lost in overcast at azimuth 200 degrees.
On the second pass the object was lost in overcast at azimuth
95 degrees. The slight divergence between the two observers'
initial azimuths is geometrically consistent with their
positions on the barracks veranda.
Object description: roughly oval with indented sides, giving
the appearance of a coke bottle minus the neck. Bright white,
very distinct, like a fluorescent lightbulb. Appeared to
vibrate. Also compared to a jellyfish for the impression of
translucence. Slightly bigger than a grapefruit held at arm's
length. No sound throughout any of the four passes.
Weather: night, overcast, scattered clouds at 1200-3000 feet,
ceiling 8000 feet, visibility 10 miles. Surface winds from the
SW at 5 knots. Winds aloft (from Kadena Base Weather Station):
160 degrees at 12 knots at 1000 feet; approximately 200 degrees
at 11 knots at 5000 feet; 210 degrees at 18 knots at 8000 feet.
Wind direction was generally from the south at all relevant
altitudes. No air traffic in the area at the time of sighting.
A rotating local beacon was explicitly and definitively ruled
out by both primary observers. The AIIR notes the beacon sweeps
in approximately the opposite direction of cloud drift at the
time and that both men were certain the object was unrelated.
Supplemental source S/Sgt Gilligan had a brief 1-2 second
sighting at approximately 2010L and described the object as
round, very much like a shooting star in color and action,
traveling at extreme speed with no sound. The preparing
officer judged this account unusable due to its brevity. It
is catalogued in the AIIR but does not affect the primary
finding.
POINTS OF INTEREST / WHAT GIVES ME PAUSE
-----------------------------------------
The four-pass pattern at precise 5-minute intervals is the
dominant feature of this case and the element that most resists
conventional explanation. A kite does not make four organized,
timed passes over the same location and return. An untethered
kite or balloon driven by wind does not cycle back for a second
pass, let alone a fourth. A tethered kite would appear roughly
stationary to fixed observers, not travel past and return. The
surface and upper winds ran from the south-southwest; the
object tracked north to south on each pass. This puts the
object moving with the low-altitude wind during each pass --
but the 5-minute interval between passes demands a mechanism
by which the object transited north (against the wind) during
each gap. No such mechanism is proposed or investigated in
the record.
The description is coherent across two independent observers.
The "coke bottle minus the neck" analogy for the shape is
specific enough to suggest genuine perceptual agreement rather
than retroactive description alignment. The jellyfish comparison
for translucence reinforces the same basic perceived quality
from the same observation event. Both observers independently
noted vibration. This internal consistency is a point in favor
of an actual phenomenon being observed.
The reviewer's marginal annotations are a secondary record of
some interest. They reference A/IC Command records showing that
HQ had received reports of similar oval-shaped objects over the
Pacific over the preceding twelve years, a number of which were
ultimately attributed to kites. They also note that the effect
of attempting to identify objects at night through scattered
clouds is "well known" as a source of ambiguity. These are
reasonable cautionary observations. However, the annotations
also record that GTS records for Okinawa were not checked, and
that apparently no follow-up or investigation was conducted by
Base P.O. (Provost Officer or Provost Office). The reviewer's
own marginal language -- partially legible -- suggests something
to the effect of "no follow on or local checks...possibly kite."
This is a pattern-match conclusion drawn from a comparison to
prior case files, not a finding based on verification of what
was actually present in the air over Kadena on 20 September
1957.
The report was distributed to CINCPACAF and DCS/I, 5AF --
Pacific Air Forces command level. This routing indicates the
field regarded the incident as substantive.
Kadena Air Base in 1957 was one of the principal USAF strategic
installations in the Western Pacific, hosting heavy bomber and
reconnaissance assets, and would have had radar coverage of the
surrounding airspace. The absence of any radar data from the
AIIR -- not even a notation that radar was queried -- is a gap.
BOTTOM LINE
-----------
The UNIDENTIFIED classification reflects honest dealing by
the preparing officer, who was direct: the four-pass regularity
defeated any conventional explanation he could identify.
The kite hypothesis is not unreasonable in the abstract --
Okinawa, 1957, night, overcast, military installation, a
pattern of similar Pacific reports on file. But the specific
behavioral evidence in this case argues against it. The
timing regularity, the consistent elevation and appearance
across passes, the final overhead transit with apparent altitude
gain -- none of this is characteristic of an uncontrolled
aerial object in a roughly south-southwest wind. The mechanism
by which the object cycled back for four passes is unexplained
and appears to have gone unasked.
The case warrants its UNIDENTIFIED classification as an
evidentiary matter. What it does not establish is what the
object was. The investigation stopped at the report stage.
A follow-up inquiry into kite or balloon launches in the area,
correlation with available radar data, or additional witness
canvassing at the base would have been straightforward -- and
the reviewer's own marginal notes acknowledge it did not
happen. This is a case where the classification is honestly
earned and the file is genuinely incomplete.
================================================================
https://glitchymatrix.com/bluebook/
GlitchyMatrix Project Blue Book Archive
All 10,808 declassified USAF UFO case files, 1945-1969
================================================================