July 1968 | Iowa City, Iowa
•
•
July 1968 | Pottstown, Pennsylvania
•
'
'
•
July 1968 | Sierravista, Arizona
•
• I •
July 1968 | Northridge, Ohio
•
July 1968 | Kettering, Ohio
•
,
July 1968 | Medway, Ohio
•
•
July 1968 | Binghamton, Newyork
•
•
July 1968 | Boise, Idaho
•
P. ~O JECT 10073 RECORD
1. ~ A - .' - Tl~ e vR§r/o255
August 1968 | Ottsville, Pennsylvania | Incident #12465
File 12il;5
Aug,.lr.1 21 , 1or 8
0ttsv1.1l , Ponm: ·1 V£:"1ia
6 pho or-
•
•
August 1968 | Freeville, New York | Incident #12467
File> 124E7
A tgu :-; t 21 , 19e 8
Freeville , New ork
5 pho OS
•
•
•
August 1968 | Hopewell Junction, New York
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
' ~--~-----
1. D A 'Tl ; To.-1--------------r----------------------------------
August 1968 | Folcroft, Pennsylvania
•
•
•
August 1968 | Memphis, Tennessee
•
•
•
P ; ·~ OJ E CT 10073 RECORD
~~--·------------
August 1968 | Jeffersonville, Indiana
•
•
August 1968 | Talladega, Alabama
•
•
•
I
August 1968 | Sanangelo, Texas
..
•
•
PROJ ECT 10073 RECORD
r~
· -·-----
August 1968 | Selma, California
•
•
10. CC~ CL USi C~
POSSIBLE AIR
August 1968 | Tucson, Arizona
•
'
I 1. U' I =• ~ *=GROUP
2. LOCATION
1
August 1968 | Pound Ridge, New York
•
•
PROJECT 1C073 RECO ~D
August 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
•
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1..
August 1968 | Yellow Springs, Ohio
•
•
p; :OJi:CT 10073
August 1968 | Xenia, Ohio, Yellow Springs, Ohio
•
August 1968 | Craigafb, Alabama
• •
August 1968 | Dayton, Kentucky
................. ~------------------------------------------------
•
• .
August 1968 | Moatsville, West Virginia
••
..
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. (
•
•
\
•
•
I
•
.-- -· ------ .. - .. .
,. . .. •
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
•
:•. 1. DATE • TIME GROUP 2. :ATION
'f 14 June 1949 15/0ll5Z Miami Beach, .Florida
•
•. 3. SOURCE JO. CONCLUSION
•
= Civil :ian Astro (Me:tmR)
.:-----------1
•
•
4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS
Two
S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
7 - 8 Seconds Observer stated object appeared just as a falling star would
including the trail behind. Object was the size of a star.
I6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION
Seconds later there was another one off to the s16!G of t.tc
t GrotJ..~d-Visual. lllhere the first one was.
1. COURSE •
wto