July 1968 | Iowa City, Iowa
•
•
July 1968 | Pottstown, Pennsylvania
•
'
'
•
July 1968 | Sierravista, Arizona
•
• I •
July 1968 | Northridge, Ohio
•
July 1968 | Kettering, Ohio
•
,
July 1968 | Medway, Ohio
•
•
July 1968 | Binghamton, Newyork
•
•
July 1968 | Boise, Idaho
•
P. ~O JECT 10073 RECORD
1. ~ A - .' - Tl~ e vR§r/o255
August 1968 | Ottsville, Pennsylvania | Incident #12465
File 12il;5
Aug,.lr.1 21 , 1or 8
0ttsv1.1l , Ponm: ·1 V£:"1ia
6 pho or-
•
•
August 1968 | Freeville, New York | Incident #12467
File> 124E7
A tgu :-; t 21 , 19e 8
Freeville , New ork
5 pho OS
•
•
•
August 1968 | Hopewell Junction, New York
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
' ~--~-----
1. D A 'Tl ; To.-1--------------r----------------------------------
August 1968 | Folcroft, Pennsylvania
•
•
•
August 1968 | Memphis, Tennessee
•
•
•
P ; ·~ OJ E CT 10073 RECORD
~~--·------------
August 1968 | Jeffersonville, Indiana
•
•
August 1968 | Talladega, Alabama
•
•
•
I
August 1968 | Sanangelo, Texas
..
•
•
PROJ ECT 10073 RECORD
r~
· -·-----
August 1968 | Selma, California
•
•
10. CC~ CL USi C~
POSSIBLE AIR
August 1968 | Tucson, Arizona
•
'
I 1. U' I =• ~ *=GROUP
2. LOCATION
1
August 1968 | Pound Ridge, New York
•
•
PROJECT 1C073 RECO ~D
August 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
•
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1..
August 1968 | Yellow Springs, Ohio
•
•
p; :OJi:CT 10073
August 1968 | Xenia, Ohio, Yellow Springs, Ohio
•
August 1968 | Craigafb, Alabama
• •
August 1968 | Dayton, Kentucky
................. ~------------------------------------------------
•
• .
August 1968 | Moatsville, West Virginia
••
..
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • ..
I
J I
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. O"Al"E • liME GROUP 2, ( - ':ATIOH I
28 Anril lt-9 29/014 5'2 Tuscon, Arizona
l. SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION
C l vilian UNIDEiiTIFIED
I
4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS
One
:S. LENGTH OF 08S~RVA TtON 'I. O~IEF SU MMARY AND ANALYS IS
12 m.i.nuten Ob3 ~LV 'lr si@lt ed a v ery lo..rge , saUJ t.U~O ··l ika object. It '\;':3.3 •
r----------------------~ th ""J i::'=' of a city block. It. t-ra3 ro t1.. uct.ing sunshine and
6. TYPE OF 08Sf:R '/" Tl m-• I . r .)}low9d a curved trajectory. It f 1,.\¥1 from vi~w aftBr
• Ground-Visua l. :.lhout, .l2 m.lnutes •
~------------------------
7. COUR SE
I
I • •
================================================================================
GLITCHY MATRIX EVALUATION FILE
Project Blue Book - Incident #332
================================================================================
PDF SOURCE: 1949-04-6309548-Tuscon-Arizona-332-.pdf
EVAL GENERATED BY: Claude Sonnet 4.6 for GlitchyMatrix.com/bluebook/
================================================================================
SECTION 1: TRANSCRIPTION OF SOURCE DOCUMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- DOCUMENT 1: PROJECT 10073 RECORD ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Form: [Project Blue Book standard form]
FIELD VALUE
--------- --------
Date-Time Group: 28 April 49 / 29/0145Z
Location: Tuscon [sic], Arizona
Incident Number: 332
Source: Civilian
Number of Objects: One
Length of Observation: 12 minutes
Type of Observation: Ground-Visual
Course: SW
Photos: No
Physical Evidence: No
CONCLUSION: UNIDENTIFIED
BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS:
"Observer sighted a very large, sausage-like object. It was the size of a
city block. It was reflecting sunshine and it followed a curved trajectory.
It faded from view after about 12 minutes."
--- DOCUMENT 2: FOR FILE / PENDING DOCUMENT ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
Contents noted:
1. Statement of [REDACTED] in dup
2. Statement of [REDACTED] in dup
3. Statement of [REDACTED] in dup
Status: - PENDING -
--- DOCUMENT 3: WITNESS STATEMENT - PRIMARY (Incident 332A) ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
Signed by: [REDACTED], Tucson, Arizona
Date/Time of Incident: Approximately 5:45 PM (1745), 28 April 1949
Location: NE of Tucson, Arizona (object over rim of Catalina Mountains)
Observation Point: Near corner of Campbell Ave. and East Hedrick Drive, Tucson
Full Transcription:
"At approximately 5:45 PM, on 28 April 1949 I sighted an object in the air
NE of Tucson, Arizona, just over the rim of the Catalina Mountains. This
object was very bright and appeared to be reflecting the sunshine. From my
point of observation, this object was first sighted at approximately a 30
degree angle of elevation and I would judge it to be at that time about 300
miles NE of Tucson. This object was in sight for approximately 12 minutes
after which time it disappeared to the SW, just gradually fading from view
in the distance. It appeared to be traveling in a curved trajectory, but I
believe this object was traveling in a straight line and from my point of
observation, the illusion was curved. I would judge this object to be
traveling in excess of 500 miles an hour at an altitude of from 5 to 10
miles up. It appeared to sausage like in shape, with no fins, wings or
protuberances of any sort. It seemed to be revolving similar to a slow roll
of an airplane. It was most visible when it reached a position where it
reflected the sun's rays, but it also could be seen during the times when no
reflections were visible. From the height and size of the object in the air,
and if it was placed on the ground, I would judge it to be the size of a city
block. I did not hear any noise nor was there any exhaust or vapor trails.
I was in the company of Mr. [REDACTED] and Tex. [REDACTED] and the three of
us were standing near the corner of Campbell Ave. and East Hedrick Drive while
this object was in sight. There were no openings visible, windows or any
other identifiable marks. The only way I can describe it is that it was
sausage like in shape. I am sure that this was not a conventional aircraft
and to the best of my knowledge and belief I can give no reasonable
explanation as to exactly what the object was that I saw."
--- DOCUMENT 4: WITNESS STATEMENT - SECOND (Incident 332, Second Observer) ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
Observer address: [REDACTED], Gallup, New Mexico
Occupation: Truck Driver with Railway Express (Ry Express)
Interrogator Comments: Considered reliable, but ability to observe averages fair.
Date/Time: 5:45 PM (1745), 28 April 1949
Observation point: In front of Circle W Ranch, near corner of East Hedrick
and North Campbell Ave., at 2218 East Hedrick Drive.
Full Transcription:
"At 5:45 PM on 28 April 1949 I sighted an object NE of Tucson, Arizona at an
angle of 75 degrees from the horizontal and at an altitude of about 25,000 to
30,000 feet. I noticed this object while standing in front of the Circle W
Ranch near the corner of East Hedrick and North Campbell Ave., at 2218 East
Hedrick Drive. I first noticed it because of the reflection of the sun on the
object which showed it a brilliant silvery color. When I first sighted the
object, it was traveling in a south-easterly direction, and finally curved to
the southwest and disappeared from view. I observed it for about 40 minutes.
This object was cigar shaped with rounded ends. Had no tail assembly or wings
that I could see. It seemed to be rotating as it traveled. I would also say it
was traveling at a high rate of speed. There were no clouds, and the sky was
very clear. Toward the front of the object I noted two circular holes which
looked just like eyes from that distance.
I did not hear any noise or notice any exhaust or vapor trails.
From its altitude I would say it would be as large as a B-29.
I was in company with two other men. One man's name was Ham and the other
man was called Tex.
I called Davis-Monthan AFB and talked to the S.O.D. who was on duty that
evening."
--- DOCUMENT 5: WITNESS STATEMENT - THIRD (Incident 332B) ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
Observer address: [REDACTED], Tucson, Ariz.
Occupation: Horse-shoer and caretaker
Interrogator Comments: Character considered high - ability as observer
considered fair.
INCIDENT NO. 332B CHECKLIST:
1. Date of Observation: 23 [NOTE: likely 28] April 1949
2. Exact Time (local): 1730
3. Place of Observation: Tucson, Arizona
4. Position of observer: Ground
5. What attracted attention: [not stated]
6. Number of objects: One
7. Apparent size: 20-25 ft long
8. Color of object: Silver
9. Shape: Oval
10. Altitude: 60 degrees, 4 to 5 miles high
11. Direction from observer: NE
12. Distance from observer: [not stated]
13. Direction of flight: SE then SW
14. Time in sight: 1/2 hour
15. Speed: Faster than B-29
16. Sound and odor: None heard
17. Trail: None noticed
18. Luminosity: Reflected light
19. Projections: [not stated]
20. Maneuvers: Appeared to revolve
21. Manner of disappearance: [not stated]
22. Effect on Clouds: [not stated]
24. Weather Conditions: Weather clear, no clouds, visibility 50 miles
Narrative:
"At about 5:30 PM on the night of 28 April 1949, I noted an object in the
sky northeast of where I reside which traveled in a southeasterly direction,
and eventually turned to the southwest and disappeared from sight. I would
judge this object to be at an angle of 60 degrees and from 4 to 5 miles high.
This object seemed oval in shape and when it caught the sun's rays, it was
a brilliant silvery color. When I first observed this object, it seemed to
turn over and disappeared for awhile. I noticed it again a few minutes later
again much farther south of my first observation.
I noted no exhaust or vapor trails. It made no noise. I could see no lights,
wings or tail surfaces. I have noticed B-29s flying high overhead, but this
seemed to travel much faster.
Looking at this object as I did for at least a half hour, it seemed to be 5
or 6 feet long, and I would say it would be 20 to 25 feet long if it was on
the ground.
When I observed this object, I was in company with a man named [Ham] and
another named [Hamm], who I believe works [in a florist shop somewhere on]
the east side."
--- DOCUMENT 6: INCIDENT 332A FORMAL CHECKLIST ---
INCIDENT NO.: 332A
Date of Observation: 28 April 1949
Exact Time (local): 1745
Place of Observation: NE Tucson, Arizona
Position of observer: [blank]
What attracted attention: [blank]
Number of objects: one
Apparent size: Size of City Block
Color of object: [blank]
Shape: Sausage like
Altitude: 30 degree Elevation, 5-10 miles
Direction from observer: NE
Distance from observer: 300 miles
Direction of flight: SW in arc
Time in sight: 12 minutes
Speed: 500 miles +
Sound and odor: None heard
Trail: None noticed
Luminosity: Reflecting sunshine
Projections: [blank]
Maneuvers: Curved trajectory, appeared to revolve
Manner of disappearance: Faded from view
Effect on Clouds: [blank]
Weather Conditions: Weather clear, no clouds, visibility 90 miles
Observer (332A):
Name/address: [REDACTED], Tucson, Arizona
Occupation: Florist
Interrogator comments: [REDACTED] ability as observer fair
Narrative (332A) - substantially the same as Document 3 above.
--- DOCUMENT 7: INCIDENT 332 FORMAL CHECKLIST (Second Witness) ---
INCIDENT NO.: 332
Date of Observation: 28 April 1949
Exact Time (local): 1745
Place of Observation: Tuscon [sic], Arizona (10-300 miles NE)
32 deg-15' North, 110 deg 57' West
Position of observer: Ground
What attracted attention: Glint of Light
Number of objects: One
Apparent size: Size of B-29
Color: Silver
Shape: Cigar or Sausage Shape (cylindrical)
Altitude: 75 deg azimuth (25,000-50,000 ft)
Direction from observer: North East
Distance from observer: [blank]
Direction of flight: NE to SE to SW in curve
Time in sight: 40 minutes
Speed: High rate of speed
Sound and odor: None noticed
Trail: None noticed
Luminosity: Reflected Sunlight
Projections: [blank]
Maneuvers: Appeared to be rotating
Manner of disappearance: Faded from view
Effect on Clouds: None
Weather Conditions: Weather Clear, no clouds, visibility 90 miles
Observer (332):
Name/address: [REDACTED], Gallup, New Mexico
Occupation: Truck Driver with Ry Express
Comments: Considered reliable, but ability to observe averages fair.
--- DOCUMENT 8: DISTRICT OFFICE NO. 17 KIRTLAND AFB INVESTIGATION PLAN ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
AT TUCSON, ARIZONA:
1. Will interview neighbors of observers.
2. Will contact FBI for check of records.
AT GALLUP, NEW MEXICO:
1. Will check neighbors of Mr. [REDACTED] to ascertain character and
reliability of witness.
2. Will check FBI files for record of [REDACTED].
--- DOCUMENT 9: USAF REPORT OF INVESTIGATION ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
Headquarters: United States Air Force, The Inspector General
Office of Special Investigations
File No: 24-8
Date: 10 May 1949
Title: SUBJECT UNKNOWN (AERIAL PHENOMENOM [sic])
Report Made By: JAMES C. HAY
Report Made At: DO #17, Kirtland AFB
Period: 3, 5, 6 May 1949
Office of Origin: DO #17, Kirtland AFB
Status: PENDING
Character: SPECIAL INQUIRIES
SYNOPSIS:
"On a report from Mr. [REDACTED] (civilian) to Staff Officer of the Day, an
investigation was initiated on [REDACTED]'s sighting of an unidentified aerial
object seen in the vicinity of Tucson, Arizona. Statements taken from persons
observing this object. Outline of Project 'Sign' followed in this
investigation."
Distribution:
CO, Kirtland AFB: 4 copies
OSI, Hq: 2 copies
File: 1 copy
Action copy forwarded to: Commanding Officer, Kirtland Air Force Base, NM
Approved by: DOYLE REES [signed]
--- DOCUMENT 10: OSI LETTER KIRTLAND AFB TO CO KIRTLAND (20 May 1949) ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
From: 17th District Office of Special Investigations, Inspector General USAF
Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico
DR/MEN/web
File No: 24-8
Date: 20 May 1949
To: Commanding Officer, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico
ATTN: Inspector General
Subject: UNKNOWN (Aerial Phenomena)
Signed by: DOYLE REES, Lt. Col., USAF, District Commander
References previous Reports of Investigation. Attaches 4 copies of Report of
Investigation dated 10 May 1949. Notes investigation is continuing. Requests
2 copies be forwarded to Commanding General, Air Materiel Command,
ATTN: MCIAXC-3.
AFIB-3338 file stamp noted.
--- DOCUMENT 11: 1ST INDORSEMENT, KAFB TO AMC ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
From: Headquarters, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, 20 May 1949
To: Commanding General, AMC, Wright-Patterson AF Base, Dayton, Ohio
ATTENTION: MCIAXO-3
Signed by: OLIVEN M. NOLAND, Captain, USAF, Adjutant
Forwards for information in connection with report of investigation forwarded
from this Headquarters on 14 December 1948.
KAFB3938 file stamp noted.
--- DOCUMENT 12: ROUTING SLIPS (2) ---
Control R-1033:
Subject: Unknown (Aerial Phenomena) / 1st Indecimal File No. 24-8
From: AFOIR-CO-1, Dated 6/21/49
To: IAXS
Recording: AXT-1, Date: 6/24/49, Hour: 1539
Routed to IAXS, Suspense: N/R
Control A-1216:
Subject: Unknown Aer. Phenomena / Conf. Q-1836
From: 17th Distr Kirtland Fld, Dated 5/20/49
To: TACS (Wmex), 1 Incl
Recording: AXT-1, Date: 5/26/49, Hour: 1100
Routed to: IAXS, Suspense: N/R
--- DOCUMENT 13: OSI LETTER TO CHIEF OF STAFF (13 June 1949) ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
From: 17th District OSI, KAFB, NM (DR/JLB/web)
File No: 24-8
Date: 13 June 1949
To: Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, Washington 25, D.C.
ATTN: Director of Intelligence
Signed by: DOYLE REES, Lt. Col., USAF, District Commander
References letter dated 7 June 1949 and four Reports of Investigation.
Attaches 1 copy of Report of Investigation dated 10 May 1949.
Notes investigation will continue with future sightings forwarded to
USAF Headquarters and HQ Air Materiel Command.
Also forwarded to: Commanding General, AMC, Wright-Patterson AF Base,
Dayton, Ohio, ATTN: MCIAX.
--- DOCUMENT 14: DETAILED INVESTIGATION REPORT (Project Sign format) ---
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (formerly CONFIDENTIAL)
1. Date of Sighting: 28 April 1949
2. Time of Sighting: 1745 hours MST
3. Where sighted:
a. Ground:
(1) Tucson, Arizona
(2) From 10 to 300 miles NE Tucson, Arizona
(3) Near corner of N Campbell and E Hedrick Dr, sidewalk in front
of 1922 East Hedrick Drive
(4) Latitude 32 deg 15' North, Longitude 110 deg 57' West
b. n/a
c. n/a
4. Number of objects: No formation (single)
5. Distance of object from observer:
a. n/a
b. From 30 deg to 70 deg elevation
c. 25,000 to 50,000 feet
6. Time in sight: from 12 to 40 minutes
7. Appearance of object:
a. Silver
b. Cigar or sausage shape
c. Metallic
d. Size: (1) From B-29 to city block; (2) From B-29 to city block
8. Direction of flight: NE to SE to SW in curved line
9. Tactics or maneuvers: Rotating
10. Evidence of exhaust:
a. No smoke
b. n/a
c. No odor
d. n/a
e. n/a
11. Effect on clouds: No clouds in sky
12. Lights: a. Reflected light from sun; b. n/a; c. n/a
13. Support: a. None; b. Not close enough to determine; c. No;
d. Not observed; e. Not known
14. Propulsion: a. Could not see; b-d. Not observed
15. Control and stability: a. None; b. None
16. Air Ducts:
a. Not observed
b. One witness observed two round holes which appeared similar to
portholes or eyes.
17. Speed: Anywhere from 200 to 600 miles per hour
18. Sound: a-c. None
19. Manner of disappearance: Faded from view
OBSERVER 1 PROFILE:
Name: [REDACTED]
Address: [REDACTED] Tucson, AZ; after 7 May 1949: Gallup, N.M.
Occupation: At Tucson - Caretaker; At Gallup - Truck Driver, Railway Express
Place of business: Caretaker for [REDACTED], Tucson, Arizona
Hobbies: Photography, 5 years experience
Ability:
Color: Not color blind
Speed of moving objects: Not very good
Size at distance: Fair
Reliability: Employer considered [reliable]
Notes: Well educated, character very good; fair amount of education;
attention drawn by Glint of light.
Additional witnesses named: Oil man; Unknown third party
OBSERVER 2 PROFILE:
Name: [REDACTED]
Address: [REDACTED], Tucson, Arizona
Occupation: Florist
Hobbies: Artist (painter in oils; landscapes and western scenes), 15 years
Ability:
Color: Good
Speed of moving objects: Poor
Size at distance: Poor
Reliability: Employer confirmation per Mr. Al Lowman
Notes: Interviewed by Special Agent Lirdell T. Politte; considered pretty
intelligent, well educated, character good;
attention drawn by Glint of light; sightings in general: fair.
OBSERVER 3 PROFILE:
Name: [REDACTED]
Address: [REDACTED], Tucson, Arizona
Occupation: Horse-shoer and caretaker
Hobbies: None
Ability:
Color: Good
Speed of moving objects: Fair
Size at distance: Fair
Reliability: Employer Mr. [REDACTED], owner Circle W Ranch, thinks highly
of witness, not prone to exaggerate, takes information at face value.
Notes: Quite intelligent, very good character, not very well educated but
character very good; sightings in general: good;
attention drawn by Glint of light.
RELATIVE TO RADAR: Not applicable.
GENERAL / ENVIRONMENTAL DATA:
1. Teletype sequences: Weather clear, no clouds, visibility 50 miles.
2. Winds aloft report, between 1700 and 1900, 28 April 1949:
Altitude (ft) | Velocity (Knots) | Direction (Degrees)
--------------|------------------|---------------------
5,000 | 4 | 320
6,000 | 2 | 340
7,000 | 3 | 170
8,000 | 4 | 220
9,000 | 8 | 210
10,000 | 9 | 210
12,000 | 12 | 200
14,000 | 15 | 230
16,000 | 17 | 260
18,000 | 16 | 260
20,000 | 7 | 270
22,000 | 4 | 340
24,000 | 7 | 320
26,000 | 13 | 290
28,000 | 22 | 270
30,000 | 29 | 280
32,000 | 35 | 280
34,000 | 44 | 280
36,000 | 45 | 280
38,000 | 45 | 280
40,000 | 40 | 280
45,000 | 50 | 280
50,000 | 55 | 280
55,000 | 50 | 280
3. Local Flight Schedules on date/time of sighting:
a. American Airlines - DC-4
b. Private - 4 light aircraft in local area
c. Air Force: 3 T-6, 1 B-26, 1 C-47, 1 B-50
4. No balloons or testing devices had been released by United States Weather
Bureau in Tucson, Arizona immediately prior to or during this time.
5. Object did not contact earth.
6. Object not near other aircraft.
7. Object sketch description: appeared to look like cigar or sausage.
Maneuvers: rotating motion.
8. Signed statements secured (inclosed).
9. Fragments or physical evidence: not applicable.
10. Radio antenna observed: None.
INCLOSURES:
FOR CO, KIRTLAND AFB:
1. Map
2. Statement of [REDACTED] in Quad
3. Statement of [REDACTED] in Quad
4. Statement of [REDACTED] in Quad
FOR OSI, HQ:
1. Statement of [REDACTED] in dup
2. Statement of [REDACTED] in dup
3. Statement of [REDACTED] in dup
--- DOCUMENT 15: AERONAUTICAL CHARTS (two maps inclosed) ---
Map 1 features noted:
Coolidge AAF (top left area), Marana No. 3 (Army), Marana AAF,
Marana No. 2 (Army), Marana No. 4 (Army), Marana No. 1 (Army),
Desert Skylock, Tucson Airpark, Tucson, Davis-Monthan AFB (DARIS-MONTHAN),
Oracle, Mammoth, Santa Catalina Mountains (Lemmon/Catalina MTs),
Fall Creek, Wagon Wheels Ranch, San Xavier Mission.
Hatched lines representing track/vectors visible on map.
Compass bearing 127 degrees and 307 degrees indicated.
Map 2 features noted:
Tucson city area, Davis-Monthan AFB with GCA system (338 T),
Tucson range (338 T), Rancho del Lago, Ryan Field, Downtown Tucson,
San Xavier Mission, Danger Areas (two noted).
VHF Four-Course Visual Aural Radio Range diagram (Newton reporting point,
Aural Range, 90 deg / 270 deg, Forney / Easton designations).
================================================================================
SECTION 2: SEARCH INDEX TERMS
================================================================================
INCIDENT DATA:
incident-332, project-sign, project-grudge, project-10073-record,
unidentified, officially-unidentified, OSI-investigation, special-inquiries
LOCATION:
Tucson, Tuscon, Arizona, Catalina-Mountains, Campbell-Ave, East-Hedrick-Drive,
Circle-W-Ranch, Davis-Monthan-AFB, Kirtland-AFB, Gallup-New-Mexico,
Latitude-32-15-North, Longitude-110-57-West
DATE / TIME:
April-1949, 28-April-1949, 1949, 1745-hours, 1730-hours, evening-sighting,
5:45-PM-MST
OBJECT DESCRIPTION:
sausage-shape, cigar-shape, cylindrical, oval, city-block-size, B-29-size,
silver, metallic, brilliant-silvery, reflected-sunlight, rotating, revolving,
slow-roll, no-wings, no-tail, no-fins, no-exhaust, no-sound, no-trails,
portholes, circular-holes, eyes, faded-from-view, curved-trajectory,
high-altitude, 25000-50000-feet, 500-mph, 200-600-mph, faster-than-B29,
CAVU-conditions
WITNESSES:
three-witnesses, civilian-witnesses, florist, caretaker, truck-driver,
railway-express, photographer, artist, horse-shoer, Gallup-NM,
multiple-observers, corroborating-accounts
INVESTIGATORS / PERSONNEL:
James-C-Hay, Doyle-Rees, Lirdell-T-Politte, Oliven-M-Noland,
Al-Lowman, 17th-District-OSI, KAFB
ORGANIZATIONS:
Inspector-General-USAF, Office-of-Special-Investigations, OSI,
Project-Sign, Kirtland-AFB, Davis-Monthan-AFB, Air-Materiel-Command,
Wright-Patterson-AFB, MCIAXO-3, AFOIR
ENVIRONMENT:
clear-sky, no-clouds, 50-90-mile-visibility, winds-aloft, westerly-winds,
Catalina-Mountains, evening-sun, Weather-Bureau-no-balloons
HYPOTHESES INVESTIGATED:
balloon-excluded, Weather-Bureau-no-release, conventional-aircraft-excluded,
no-balloons, no-test-devices, American-Airlines-DC4, B-50, B-26, C-47
OUTCOME:
officially-unidentified, PENDING, investigation-continuing, no-explanation,
OSI-special-inquiries, multiple-reports-forwarded-AMC
================================================================================
SECTION 3: GM ANALYSIS
================================================================================
-- Glitch N. Matrix | GlitchyMatrix.com | AI Assessment --
-- Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Project Blue Book Archive Evaluation --
================================================================================
CASE OVERVIEW:
On the evening of 28 April 1949, at approximately 5:30-5:45 PM MST, three
civilian witnesses at the corner of North Campbell Avenue and East Hedrick
Drive in Tucson, Arizona observed a large, silver, cigar-shaped or sausage-
shaped object moving through the sky northeast of the city. The object was
first noticed because it caught the sunlight brilliantly. It traveled in a
curved arc from the northeast to the southeast and then southwest, appearing
to rotate or revolve as it moved, and faded from view. No sound, no exhaust,
no vapor trails. One witness called Davis-Monthan Air Force Base while the
event was still fresh.
The formal investigation -- a full OSI Special Inquiries case, File 24-8,
conducted by District Office 17 at Kirtland AFB under Lt. Col. Doyle Rees
and Special Agent James C. Hay -- produced signed statements from all three
witnesses, background checks, winds aloft data, local flight schedule
confirmation, and Weather Bureau balloon release verification. The case was
forwarded up to the Director of Intelligence at USAF HQ in Washington, as
well as to Air Materiel Command.
Official conclusion: UNIDENTIFIED.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS:
Three witnesses at the same location, in each other's company, all observed
the same object at the same time. Their accounts are independent (taken
separately by OSI investigators) and corroborate each other on the core
attributes: silver/metallic appearance, cigar or sausage shape, no wings
no tail no fins, rotation or revolution, no sound, no exhaust, and a curved
flight path ending with the object fading to the southwest.
Where the accounts diverge is informative:
OBSERVATION DURATION: The primary witness (Florist/332A) reports 12 minutes.
The second witness (Truck Driver/332) reports 40 minutes. The third witness
(Horse-shoer/332B) reports approximately half an hour. This could mean the
first witness had a narrower window to observe -- perhaps occupied with
something or arriving later at the observation point -- while the other two
tracked it from a slightly earlier time. The discrepancy does not impugn the
accounts; such variation is typical of group observations.
ELEVATION ANGLE: Witness 1 reports about 30 degrees elevation. Witness 2
reports 75 degrees. Witness 3 reports 60 degrees. These differences are
significant -- 30 vs 75 degrees is not a minor observational variance.
However, the object was described as moving in a long arc from NE to SW,
and the witnesses may have been recording the angle at different points in
that arc. An object descending from high altitude while moving toward the
southwest would present a lower and lower elevation angle as it moved away.
The 75-degree reading might represent the initial sighting overhead while
the 30-degree reading represents the object when it was already well into
its southwest course.
SIZE ESTIMATES: The primary witness estimates city-block scale if placed
on ground. Witness 2 estimates size of a B-29. Witness 3 estimates 20-25
feet long on the ground (significantly smaller). The OSI composite figure
for the official checklist notes "from B-29 to city block" -- a range that
acknowledges the uncertainty. The third witness's smaller estimate may
reflect a closer object (higher elevation at his position relative to it)
or simply greater difficulty with high-altitude size estimation.
THE "PORTHOLES" OR "EYES" DETAIL: One witness (the Truck Driver, who had
the longest observation at 40 minutes and recorded the highest elevation
angle -- closest approach) noted "two circular holes which looked just like
eyes from that distance." The OSI report formally records this as: "One
witness observed two round holes which appeared similar to portholes or eyes."
This detail does not appear in the other statements and is treated matter-of-
factly in the report. It is one of those specific, unusual observations that
is harder to fabricate or explain -- a witness making up a story would likely
not insert porthole-like openings into a sausage shape rather than the more
dramatic "windows with lights" that fiction tends to produce.
THE DATE DISCREPANCY: Incident 332B (the Horse-shoer's checklist form)
carries the date "23 April 1949" while all other documents and statements
in this file, including this witness's own narrative, clearly describe the
event of 28 April 1949. This appears to be a clerical transcription error
on the form -- the narrative content is fully consistent with the 28 April
event and the witness identifies the same companions.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT MATTERS HERE:
The winds aloft data are critical. At the altitudes where the object was
estimated to be (25,000-50,000 ft), winds on 28 April 1949 between 1700
and 1900 were running predominantly from the west and southwest at 22-55
knots. The upper atmosphere was moving toward the east and northeast.
A weather balloon, test device, or any passive aerostatic object would
have been carried eastward or northeastward by these winds, not southwest.
The object moved from northeast to southwest -- directly against the prevailing
upper-level flow. This is aerodynamically significant: whatever this object
was, it was not drifting with the wind.
The Weather Bureau explicitly confirmed no balloons or testing devices had
been released in the Tucson area immediately prior to or during the event.
All local flight schedules were accounted for (American Airlines DC-4,
4 private light aircraft, USAF T-6s, a B-26, C-47, and B-50). None match
the description of a city-block-scale, cigar-shaped, rotating object at
altitude traveling against the wind in near-silence.
PROXIMITY TO DAVIS-MONTHAN AND KIRTLAND:
The sighting occurred in a city hosting Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, with
Kirtland AFB (Albuquerque) running the investigation. The witness who saw the
object longest called Davis-Monthan the same evening. The OSI investigation
was thorough and professional. No classified test aircraft or device was ever
offered as an explanation. If any sensitive experimental program had been
operating in the area, the OSI investigators routing this to the Director of
Intelligence would presumably have received a classified quiet word. No such
closure appears in the file.
WHAT THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION GOT RIGHT:
The single-word conclusion UNIDENTIFIED is accurate. The investigation was
handled with more rigor than most Blue Book cases of this era -- three signed
statements, background checks on all witnesses, winds aloft data, flight
schedule crosscheck, Weather Bureau balloon exclusion, and formal forwarding
to the Director of Intelligence. The file acknowledges the object does not
match any known aircraft, balloon, or natural phenomenon available in 1949.
The OSI did not attempt to force an astronomical explanation, a balloon
explanation, or an aircraft misidentification. The investigators collected
the data, noted the anomaly, and reported it honestly.
WHAT WAS MISSED OR UNDEREXPLORED:
The investigator requested FBI background checks and neighbor interviews for
the witnesses but there is no indication in this file that those checks ever
returned or produced exculpatory or impeaching information. The case status
remains "PENDING" in the final available documents, suggesting the file was
open-ended rather than formally closed with a conclusion.
The elevation-angle discrepancy among witnesses would have benefited from
a geometric analysis -- if investigators had triangulated the three reported
angles against the known observation point and the reported trajectory, they
might have produced a better altitude and distance estimate. That analysis
is absent.
The "rotation" behavior observed by multiple independent witnesses is
significant and was not explored analytically. If the object was truly
rotating at altitude while maintaining directional flight (NE to SW), this
rules out tumbling debris or any passive aerostatic object. Rotation combined
with directed flight suggests controlled or self-stabilized propulsion.
WHAT MAKES THIS CASE NOTABLE:
1. THREE INDEPENDENT CORROBORATING WITNESSES: A florist, a truck driver, and
a horse-shoer, interviewed separately, all describing the same object, at
the same location, at the same time, with consistent core attributes. No
motive for coordination. Character assessments by OSI range from fair to
very good.
2. EXPLICIT BALLOON EXCLUSION: The Weather Bureau formally confirmed no
balloon or test device releases in the area at that time. This is documented,
not merely assumed.
3. FLIGHT AGAINST UPPER WINDS: At the altitudes estimated, prevailing winds
were westerly. The object moved from NE to SW -- against the upper wind
flow. This rules out any passive or semi-passive aerostatic explanation.
4. ROTATION UNDER DIRECTED FLIGHT: Multiple witnesses independently noted
the object appeared to rotate or revolve while maintaining a consistent
curved flight path. This combination is physically distinctive and not
attributable to tumbling debris.
5. CITY-BLOCK SCALE: Even the smallest size estimate places the object at
20-25 feet if near (no aircraft that small operates without propulsion
sounds at B-29 speeds), while the larger estimates suggest something on
the scale of early jet bombers or larger.
6. DIRECT DAVIS-MONTHAN NOTIFICATION: The second witness called the base
the same evening. The duty officer who took that call is part of the
chain of events that generated the formal investigation. The military
took it seriously from the first report.
7. FORMAL OSI JURISDICTION: This is not a standard ATIC case form -- it is
an OSI Special Inquiries file, routed to the Director of Intelligence.
That escalation indicates the investigators at the working level considered
it worthy of senior attention.
BOTTOM LINE:
Incident #332 is a multi-witness, formally investigated, environment-verified
case with no explanation then and none since. The object was observed by three
people with independent credibility assessments ranging from fair to very good,
over a period of twelve to forty minutes, in clear sky with excellent visibility.
It moved against the prevailing upper-level winds. It rotated while maintaining
a curved directed flight path. No balloons, no classified devices, no
conventional aircraft matched the description. The only honest word for it is
what Project Blue Book put on the form:
UNIDENTIFIED.
================================================================================
END OF EVALUATION
GlitchyMatrix.com/bluebook/ | Project Blue Book Archive
================================================================================