February 1968 | Miamisburg, Ohio
•
February 1968 | Fayetteville, North Carolina
• •
'
1
P
February 1968 | Toledo, Ohio
- •
February 1968 | Jeffersonville, Sowersville, Ohio
I , ••
-
. l . '') ~ . i
February 1968 | Groveton, Missouri
I
.. }
I
- --.~
11:
' "•• . .........
OA ~·c:·.: 'tMt:
~
February 1968 | Clewiston, Florida
•
PROJEC ; ' 10073 RECORD •
1. ·· U~ TE ·· T IME GROUP
February 1968 | Location Illegible
•
• •
•
..
February 1968 | Citrus Heights, California
•
• •
•
February 1968 | Miami, Florida
•
•
February 1968 | Lyndhurst, Ohio
•
•
•
-j , -( lf,- - - ·
I
February 1968 | Avon, New York
•
'
.' ..
•
February 1968 | Evansville, Illinois
•
February 1968 | Irvington, New York
•• •
•
•
PROJECT 100/3 RtC
March 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
•
•
,
•
March 1968 | Rossburg, Ohio
•
..
--
I" ~
'
-........ , _
1: :-. · ·:::
_ ------
·;·;~"r; ~x :.u f
March 1968 | Between Chorpus Christi and Robstown, Texas
•
-- .
•
•
March 1968 | Worthington, Ohio
•
•
"""" "' . .. ... , '""' ___ , ""
March 1968 | Davenport, Iowa
•
•
March 1968 | Fairborn, Ohio
•
-
..
__
..,
March 1968 | Bay City, Michigan
•
. - .•.••'
' •WI., --
' . •
March 1968 | Kettering, Ohio
PROJ ECT 10073 RECORD
' .....
March 1968 | Amarillo, Texas
•
•
. ---· -·----------
PR
March 1968 | Near Centerville, Ohio
•
•
PROJECT '!00/3 R~CORD
--··u---·--·-
March 1968 | Tarenton, Pennsylvania
March 1968 | Pleasant Valley, Ohio
I
' ,.,...
~_, - - -.... .
....,
PROJECT i 0073 ReCORD
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. ••
•
I
•
POOJECT ~ 3 ~co;;o I·
~c'fl!o~o ~. L OCATtoH
k-9_!_
~b __6_s____l _o;o_o2
__ _o_z__-+_________________K_e_t_t_e_r_1n_s_.__o_h_1__o__________. ___________________-;
l. l!iv~C ~ . 10. COHCLU3tcfit tj--
I,__C~vilian
- - --------1
. . Probabl e Astro (VF.1~US ) / ~~
t . HliM2'E J't OF ~I JECTS
The address given by the observer i s non - existant . However rr~
One ·the iLfo~ation given it a ppeares t hat she was wa tch ing Venu9 .
~--------------------~ ·
5. LEH CTH 0~ OiU ERVATIO,_. 11. !~l i EF SU~ARY AND AHALYIIS I
l.
15 rli nu t e s The observe r si ePted a wh i te light t hat was sta tionary in the
I
t.. TYP£ Ott O UERVATIOH wes t. The observer was still wa t ching it at the time of the •