February 1968 | Miamisburg, Ohio
•
February 1968 | Fayetteville, North Carolina
• •
'
1
P
February 1968 | Toledo, Ohio
- •
February 1968 | Jeffersonville, Sowersville, Ohio
I , ••
-
. l . '') ~ . i
February 1968 | Groveton, Missouri
I
.. }
I
- --.~
11:
' "•• . .........
OA ~·c:·.: 'tMt:
~
February 1968 | Clewiston, Florida
•
PROJEC ; ' 10073 RECORD •
1. ·· U~ TE ·· T IME GROUP
February 1968 | Location Illegible
•
• •
•
..
February 1968 | Citrus Heights, California
•
• •
•
February 1968 | Miami, Florida
•
•
February 1968 | Lyndhurst, Ohio
•
•
•
-j , -( lf,- - - ·
I
February 1968 | Avon, New York
•
'
.' ..
•
February 1968 | Evansville, Illinois
•
February 1968 | Irvington, New York
•• •
•
•
PROJECT 100/3 RtC
March 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
•
•
,
•
March 1968 | Rossburg, Ohio
•
..
--
I" ~
'
-........ , _
1: :-. · ·:::
_ ------
·;·;~"r; ~x :.u f
March 1968 | Between Chorpus Christi and Robstown, Texas
•
-- .
•
•
March 1968 | Worthington, Ohio
•
•
"""" "' . .. ... , '""' ___ , ""
March 1968 | Davenport, Iowa
•
•
March 1968 | Fairborn, Ohio
•
-
..
__
..,
March 1968 | Bay City, Michigan
•
. - .•.••'
' •WI., --
' . •
March 1968 | Kettering, Ohio
PROJ ECT 10073 RECORD
' .....
March 1968 | Amarillo, Texas
•
•
. ---· -·----------
PR
March 1968 | Near Centerville, Ohio
•
•
PROJECT '!00/3 R~CORD
--··u---·--·-
March 1968 | Tarenton, Pennsylvania
March 1968 | Pleasant Valley, Ohio
I
' ,.,...
~_, - - -.... .
....,
PROJECT i 0073 ReCORD
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
••
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. OA l ( • • T i !.l:.. ~fOW' :2. LOCATION
•
J an 69 o6ooz Cool ville • Ohio
~-·-
J. SOUP.Cf 10. CONCLUSION
Civil ian VISUAL: OT.H:E."R : (UNRELIABLE REPORT)
---
• · NliM£\ER OF O:lJECTS
PHOTO: OTnEH : ( NO Il'1A@)
•
One
S. LENGTH OF C!SEAVATIOH 11. BRIEF SUMI!AARY AHO ANALYSIS
Over an Hour The observ er wathced a etar-liko light in the big dipper f or
' at l east an hour . "It then moved to th e t op d.f the sky--- •
•' t.. TYPE OF 08SeRVATIOM
and just faded away as though go ing straight up •
Gr ou:ld-Vi.3ual
7, COURSE
The observe r has seen numerous other UFOs in the pas t
COI·-'ir"l::!J'IS:
It is felt tha t the observer is unable to e asily recognize such
J_ ~=~t ?.eported s ttmulis as stars, satellite s~ airc~aft, meteors; etc and f or
i. P HOTOS
this reason the sighting is being carri ed as Unreliable Re port.
••