February 1968 | Miamisburg, Ohio
•
February 1968 | Fayetteville, North Carolina
• •
'
1
P
February 1968 | Toledo, Ohio
- •
February 1968 | Jeffersonville, Sowersville, Ohio
I , ••
-
. l . '') ~ . i
February 1968 | Groveton, Missouri
I
.. }
I
- --.~
11:
' "•• . .........
OA ~·c:·.: 'tMt:
~
February 1968 | Clewiston, Florida
•
PROJEC ; ' 10073 RECORD •
1. ·· U~ TE ·· T IME GROUP
February 1968 | Location Illegible
•
• •
•
..
February 1968 | Citrus Heights, California
•
• •
•
February 1968 | Miami, Florida
•
•
February 1968 | Lyndhurst, Ohio
•
•
•
-j , -( lf,- - - ·
I
February 1968 | Avon, New York
•
'
.' ..
•
February 1968 | Evansville, Illinois
•
February 1968 | Irvington, New York
•• •
•
•
PROJECT 100/3 RtC
March 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
•
•
,
•
March 1968 | Rossburg, Ohio
•
..
--
I" ~
'
-........ , _
1: :-. · ·:::
_ ------
·;·;~"r; ~x :.u f
March 1968 | Between Chorpus Christi and Robstown, Texas
•
-- .
•
•
March 1968 | Worthington, Ohio
•
•
"""" "' . .. ... , '""' ___ , ""
March 1968 | Davenport, Iowa
•
•
March 1968 | Fairborn, Ohio
•
-
..
__
..,
March 1968 | Bay City, Michigan
•
. - .•.••'
' •WI., --
' . •
March 1968 | Kettering, Ohio
PROJ ECT 10073 RECORD
' .....
March 1968 | Amarillo, Texas
•
•
. ---· -·----------
PR
March 1968 | Near Centerville, Ohio
•
•
PROJECT '!00/3 R~CORD
--··u---·--·-
March 1968 | Tarenton, Pennsylvania
March 1968 | Pleasant Valley, Ohio
I
' ,.,...
~_, - - -.... .
....,
PROJECT i 0073 ReCORD
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
I
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
(~~- I:·· -~ -·· .;~~;.-~:::~~o~u~r-7'".---,r2:-.-:-L:o:c-:-A:"T:-:Io~N~,;.;.;;.:.::.:..:::.::.:.:~:::!~-------------~--.-~ I
I
· '' o · ·: t.· t' '-1 ;vLZ Buci<:l Barbor AFS, Maine.
·-· - . -- ----------------r.~~~~~~------------------------------------------------_j
•• : .. , ,,,• rL
... •
10• CONCLUSION I
I
l~il/Civ INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION
.t.-·-· ·- - R-------------1
Nllr ~t~EOF OBJECTS
l
~. LENGTH 011 OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
l-3 minutes .
•
Observer sighted a red-yellov object that was slightly larg·
er than a grapefruit and vaa teardrop shape.
t•• lYPE OF OBSERVATION
.. Comments: The sigbting vas not inve tigated according to
GroWld Visual
regs. The local Air Force Base vaa requested to re-investi·
7, COURSE gate. '.b this date the requests ot this investigation have
not oeen recei ,·ed. '
8