GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
February 1968 | Miamisburg, Ohio
10 pp
i 3 oF © Fe bh EL 1). D&A IE . I ME SROUP 11304 2. LOCATION PROJECT 13973 RECORD -lamisour.z, Chi. 13. soukce 10. CONCLUSION B | L
February 1968 | Fayetteville, North Carolina
9 pp
1. DATE - TIME —— EB LOCATION oo oo oo Tw | 6 Feb 68 06/2330% | Co Fayetteville, North Carolina (2 Wits [5 source ~ |10. concLusion - 5 ] - Civilian | Probable (AIRCRAFT) | 4
February 1968 | Toledo, Ohio
3 pp
Te =) Ee eee pe FE | PROJECT 1073 RECCTD i a hoa A i Cm | im, Hi hn i | i & ’ ) ) i Ir = = | 3 - i i ~ - A COMCLUSICN a Gl, Villon . heim Da GF C3JECTS 0 lous
February 1968 | Jeffersonville, Sowersville, Ohio
35 pp
cr/o0c a Tas-B : pee , AER ar UBJECTS Une oo LENGTH OF OBSERVATION TYPE OF OBSERVATION 20 Minutes to 1 Hour LOCA ON ult I | To CONCLUSION Probable Astro = ee oe a i ah 1. BRIEF S
February 1968 | Groveton, Missouri
25 pp
d |6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ————— i, i Fe Ww ' — 1. DATE IMU GROUP J Fel, 0b — — 3. SQUE CE Civilian | 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS One [5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 1-5 minutes
February 1968 | Clewiston, Florida
27 pp
| 1.-DATE . TIME GROUP 9 Ted 68 PROJ ect 10073 RECORD 2. LOCATION Clewiston, Florida {3. 50URCE Civilian |4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | Qne i 5. LENGTH OF O
February 1968 | Location Illegible
33 pp
• • • • ..
February 1968 | Citrus Heights, California
18 pp
1 £, Apn b 4 o X1/ 03 15 | RPE ST. wl Lil) mw Co Civiliac mr— oo ier = = A, NUMBER OF OBJECTS ww LENGTH OF OBSERYATION |11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS RECORD GC i t I lS i io i a y
February 1968 | Miami, Florida
12 pp
i oo 5 | Bi iy = — he = ow = 5 ¥ |] bo Er i ie hf ow nia \ Ba hrs bP wh | | NMUMODLE OF OBJECTS CONCLUSION BALLOON F CBSERVATION 5 Minuteg 0asE RVATION 0 a T Y PE = i a F I om Ea
February 1968 | Lyndhurst, Ohio
Insufficient Data 3 pp
wt Sd a SER OF OBJECTS Not vw = ELA rie a 10. CONCLUSION 1a UFrICI A For besn PROJECT 10073 RECORD EE Tt io 117 sent returned. ENT Tila Fort EVALUAT the chasrver 5.
February 1968 | Avon, New York
Other 16 pp
Wi o — - " | § a i, Ele TT EE le LATE = § ine Geode 2 LEC) ion Fam oa 0 =F 3 F ™ ie - 5 We uw, = = = tg a oO Fue Day hw =f Yor: ( uy Fa TT iY % ee = E——— = = =
February 1968 | Evansville, Illinois
11 pp
PROJECT 1 | 0073 § RECORC | 2. LOCA" iON. | | (3. SCUR Le 116. CONCLUSION . ayiljan ee Er— 14. MUMBER OF OBJECTS Ht dis PebAELS that the oNseTyeE signted a sa al
February 1968 | Irvington, New York
88 pp
re ——— = aie ——— =a - me ———— i mn ee — lL DATT - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION Na oy i. § wl yey I YN ) B - ~ 2 aldali: e [/ O10 La Irvington, Ney York LL B B 3. SOURCE |10. CONCLUSI
March 1968 | Dayton, Ohio
Other 97 pp
Pu OJECT 15373 A RECORD 2, LOCATION MLV | Poe Wf [ ~ i Ee HU} 3. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION — ] eo Mar or aor 68 (Conflifting) Daytuon, Ohi
March 1968 | Rossburg, Ohio
4 pp
bo ; 4. | | Li i © lili =. YimE CROUP 1 sar 66 — i — —— c2/ 927 C4 Aoss Chal iE y PROJECT cof 3 RECUR LOCH OM # " i ey ry, J) pi i. i— © Law WAVE dy — = = SUR C Ee Civilian
March 1968 | Between Chorpus Christi and Robstown, Texas
6 pp
EEE EE EC = = = B 5 = 10 Minutes TYPE OF OBSERVATION | Ground=Visual l 7. COURSE Not heported PHOTQS 0 Yen Cle 2. PHYSICAL 0 Yes 2. LOCATION
March 1968 | Worthington, Ohio
Aircraft 9 pp
ll, Ey Boa LI 5 Mod _— wl ad ff rowing "UA Te - TiiE GROUP l2, LOCATION |3. souice 110. CONCLUSION | i | Civiliaag | 2oobable (ALICAAFT) Is NUMBER OF OBJECT Observer was s
March 1968 | Davenport, Iowa
Other 23 pp
| La Te LpOXT - » JTowa CONCLUSION - fro TaoTT ° hk —L 1A805% pat Ta I'CR F SUMAARY AND ANALYSIS i BRIE The observer sigated and ph ERVATION crotide Vi gual w= i CO
March 1968 | Fairborn, Ohio
Astro (Other) 8 pp
Ee — py CR ci + (eo Nm END GE GEE ie RR ey, EER op fmm maa ———— EE PROJECT 10075 RECORD ¥ B # Te i - (1. 3475 TME GROUP 2. LOCATION 3, SGURCE [10. CONCLUSION rairoorn, Ohio i 5 FE =
March 1968 | Bay City, Michigan
Balloon 19 pp
| W LB | tem ds LER, oe Ae ey a a j ) Woo el pt Mig Le i wal wand rm om we bvenica m jie COLCLUSIOH ~~ . CL ) gr La TEAS HAT OT mT Li j Ee] iw oa i = Eo EE = Ty 4 aT xu
March 1968 | Kettering, Ohio
Insufficient Data 12 pp
el i, l l 11:04 TE. TIME GROUP WT —r—— = a 4. NUMBER OF D3JECTS 1 fr mm Cy hi ep i 1; oi mi i | i 5 jo i | y 2. Sulifr- Civilian ~~ PROJECT 10273 RECORD 2. LOCATION _ Kettering,
March 1968 | Amarillo, Texas
Aircraft 40 pp
1 | Civilian & Military rHikB3eR OF OBJECTS —— | (fhere were no radar paints of unusual objects. A shallow pnder which a thin layer of smoke was trapped, existed of the ] 1.
March 1968 | Near Centerville, Ohio
Astro (Other) 20 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD mem il a i al, (iil ce ——— i: DATE Me GROUP "9. LOCATION fodar t O77 0s 304 Hear Conia Wass, URIC Vial a T EE rE == i ——— RE = — em i le, (1 © Rr pS — em
March 1968 | Tarenton, Pennsylvania
Insufficient Data 13 pp
To a = | — a Pl De = i . ‘Az aRDLP er baa SOUR CE ©3 Civilian 4. NUMBER OF OBJEC E—— Tar TE sc Cne Er J Poa Ee ee i LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 07/0250 110. {No other similar eDa
March 1968 | Pleasant Valley, Ohio
Aircraft 9 pp
rss peti a 1 1. CATE - IME SROU i 13. SOUR CE ) Civilian 14. MUMBER OF OBJECTS One {10. CONCLUSION 2. LOCATION clecsant Valley, Ohio Provable (AIECRAFT) observer was requested t
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1961-08-8299363-NewYork-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION New York, New York
DATE August 1961
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8299363
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 24
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 7 + 4 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. | 1. paTE (2. LOCATION 14 Aug 61 A 4. DATE-TIME ¢ GROUP a aa i Taking tige aay and negatives WH Hf a a Fw To all = = — 5 Ww Ball Hd el ew York (0 Probably Balloon | — — ———seeeet O0. Possibly Bolloon g-=4 Was Aircraft Probably Aircraft Possibly Aircraft 0 Was Astronomical 0 Prebably Astrenomicol |0 Possibly Asin nomi cel lo hr el = | octestnd Unknown $ FTD photo-analysis “examine and concluded that the alleged SEVES. | were caused by poor pho 0 | | processit Ze. Jts were not observed during > exposure, only after film was processed. | | There have been several photographs sub- | | mitted for analysis which are supposedly UFO's. In every case where objts were not bserved until after film processing, cb] turned out to be a reflection unseen by | | po damaged emulsion Ih being bd