OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
•
•
•
• • PROJECT 10073 RECORD CAR~
• • •
1. DATE LOCATION \ 12. CONCLUSIONS
9 0 · ~her
3. OATE·TIM!
1951
GROU~
I.. 'i\~ ! 'r..: H'.'J t c , Indian1.
tYPE OF OBSERVATION
0
0
0
Was Balloon
ProboMy Calloon
Possi bly Balloon
13/· / 0 Wos Ah c:roft
Loco1----~----------------- P Ground- Vlauol 0 Ground- Rodor
0 Probobly Ai rcroh
GMT 09/19/r2Z 0 AI~ VI auol 0 Alr•lnt.rcopt Rodor 0 Po
----------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION
File: 1951-10-7011055-TerreHaute-Indiana.pdf
Transcribed from document image by Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
FIELD 1 -- DATE: 9 October 1951
FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: Terre Haute, Indiana
FIELD 3 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: Local 1342 / GMT 09/1942Z
FIELD 4 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION:
Ground-Visual [X]
Ground-Radar [ ]
Air-Visual [ ]
Air-Intercept Radar [ ]
FIELD 5 -- PHOTOS: No
FIELD 6 -- SOURCE: Civilian
FIELD 7 -- LENGTH OF OBS: 15 Seconds
FIELD 8 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: One
FIELD 9 -- COURSE: SE
FIELD 10 -- BRIEF SUMMARY:
Round silver object without fins or protrusions observed in
flight from overhead to disappearance over the horizon.
Flight straight. Total observation 15 seconds, conservation.
Size of 50 cent piece at arm's length. No sound. Witness
considered "hard headed".
[Note: "conservation" appears to be a line-break artifact
for "conservative" -- consistent with context and supporting
documents which describe the 15-second estimate as
"conservative."]
FIELD 11 -- COMMENTS:
Possible a/c sighting, however, to duration of 15 seconds
for flight from [illegible] zenith to point over the horizon
in 15 seconds is not consistent with this analysis and the
case is carried as unidentified.
[Note: Three characters before "zenith" are unclear in both
available copies -- possibly "the" or a reference marker.]
FIELD 12 -- CONCLUSIONS: Other UNIDENTIFIED [X]
(handwritten/typed next to
"Other" checkbox)
Form: ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 52)
Note: Form revision date (September 1952) postdates the October
1951 incident. Record card was completed retrospectively,
consistent with standard ATIC filing practice for cases
investigated under Project Grudge prior to the Blue Book
reorganization.
Additional documents in this file:
- Spot Intelligence Report 12D 1-11-100, 25 October 1951,
signed LeROY BITCON, Lt Col, USAF, District Commander,
12th District Office of Special Investigations,
Chanute AFB, Illinois
- Air Intelligence Information Report IR-56-51E (AF Form 112,
Parts I and II), 30 November 1951, prepared by Major J.L.
Hudelson, approved by Lt. Col. Bruce K. Baumgardner,
Director of Intelligence, Hq EADF, Stewart AFB, N.Y.
- Multiple Appendices (Status Reports I and II) covering
Terre Haute, Indiana -- 9 October 1951
- Multiple teletype messages and Joint Message Forms between
EADF, ATIC (Wright-Patterson), OSI Chanute, USAF Washington,
ADC Ent AFB, dated 10 October through 25 October 1951,
including one bearing the signature of Lt. E.J. Ruppelt,
ATIA-2c (later director of Project Blue Book)
================================================================
SEARCH INDEX TERMS
================================================================
Terre Haute Indiana Vigo County Hulman Municipal Airport State Road
42 1951 October CAA Civil Aeronautics Authority civilian aircraft
communicator professional observer Claude Sonner Charles Warren pilot
private plane round silver disc sphere silent no sound no fins no
protrusions no vapor trail southeasterly 15 seconds half dollar fifty
cent piece arm's length UNIDENTIFIED speed 2880 MPH 600 MPH stationary
reversed direction hover dual sighting corroborated ground visual air
visual Paris Illinois Newport Indiana Atomic Energy Plant Army chemical
weapons depot TPS-13 radar Rockville Indiana no radar contact CAVU
clear weather 5000 feet Project Grudge Project Blue Book ATIC
Wright-Patterson Chanute AFB 12th District OSI Ruppelt Hudelson
Baumgardner Bitcon Farris Eastern Air Defense Force EADF Stewart AFB
hardheaded skeptic credible observer institutional response teletype
================================================================
CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION
The Project 10073 record card carries this case as UNIDENTIFIED,
and the wording of Field 11 is unusually candid about why. The
investigator's comment acknowledges that an aircraft sighting was
considered, then explicitly rejected: the 15-second transit from
directly overhead to the horizon is "not consistent with this
analysis." This is not a default or a shrug. It is a considered
conclusion that the known facts did not support a conventional
identification.
A separate evaluation in the Air Intelligence Information Report
(IR-56-51E, 30 November 1951) takes a softer position, suggesting
a second sighting three minutes later and thirty miles away may
indicate the objects were jet aircraft whose appearance was
distorted by sun reflection. This hypothesis appears as a
speculative working note rather than a supported conclusion, and
it does not appear to have overridden the UNIDENTIFIED label on
the record card. The two documents reflect the tension that ran
through the entire Blue Book era: field investigators and record
keepers reaching one conclusion while the reporting chain
searched for a comfortable conventional explanation.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS
The primary observer was Claude W. Sonner, Chief Aircraft
Communicator for the Civil Aeronautics Authority at Hulman
Municipal Airport. His professional position placed him in daily
contact with aerial traffic; he was trained to observe, report,
and characterize aircraft. The record card notes he was
considered "hard headed" -- language echoed almost word-for-word
in a United Press news release on 10 October 1951, which
described him as "a hardheaded CAA official" who had now
"joined the ranks of those who believe in flying saucers." This
phrasing is significant. It implies prior skepticism, and it
means Sonner was not the kind of observer who would report
something he could identify as ordinary. The press treated
his account as newsworthy precisely because he was not expected
to make such a report.
At 1342 CST on 9 October 1951, from a position directly overhead
at Hulman Airport (approximately five miles east of Terre Haute
on Indiana State Road 42), Sonner observed a single round silver
object. It was featureless: no fins, no protrusions, no exhaust
or vapor trail, and no sound. Its apparent size was that of a
half-dollar coin held at arm's length. It traveled a straight
southeasterly path, moving from directly overhead to the horizon
in approximately 15 seconds -- a figure Sonner himself described
as a conservative estimate. Observation conditions were ideal:
clear day, bright sun, no clouds or haze, flat terrain, and no
obstructions between the observer and the horizon.
The investigators calculated that if the object was at 200 feet
altitude, it was traveling approximately 2,880 miles per hour.
They further noted that the actual speed would scale upward with
altitude -- meaning this figure represented a lower bound, not
a ceiling.
Three minutes later, at 1345 CST, a corroborating report came
in. Pilot Charles Warren was flying a private aircraft at 5,000
feet on a route from Greencastle, Indiana to Paris, Illinois.
Just east of Paris -- roughly thirty miles from Hulman Airport --
Warren observed a silver object. Crucially, the object appeared
stationary at approximately his altitude. As his aircraft
approached, the object did not change apparent size, indicating
it was not moving toward or away from him. It then reversed
direction and was last seen heading northeasterly, south of the
Atomic Energy Plant at Newport, Indiana.
If both sightings represent the same object, the investigators
calculated a maximum transit speed of approximately 600 MPH
(thirty miles in three minutes). That figure is below Sonner's
ground-observation estimate but is still at or near the
performance envelope of the fastest jet aircraft operationally
available in 1951 -- and this object left no sound, no trail,
and showed no conventional propulsion signature.
The TPS-13 electronic surveillance radar at Rockville, Indiana
was queried and reported no contact with the object.
POINTS OF INTEREST
The flight path merits attention. The object was seen heading
southeast from Terre Haute, then reported northeast of Paris,
Illinois, and last observed south of the Atomic Energy Plant at
Newport, Indiana. Newport in October 1951 was home to the Army's
Newport Chemical Depot (formally Newport Army Ammunition Plant),
an active facility for chemical weapons production situated on
the Wabash River approximately thirty-five miles north-northeast
of Terre Haute. Whatever the object was, its observed trajectory
in both sightings placed it in proximity to a significant and
sensitive military-industrial installation. This detail would
have heightened official interest beyond a routine unexplained
sighting, and the institutional response confirms that it did.
The administrative and communications chain this case generated
is unusual in scope. Within days of the incident, teletype
traffic was flowing between the 12th District OSI at Chanute
AFB, Eastern Air Defense Force at Stewart AFB in New York, ATIC
at Wright-Patterson, USAF headquarters in Washington, and ADC
at Ent AFB in Colorado. The case was tracked under Project
Grudge, the active UFO investigation program of the period.
One of the ATIC communications in this file carries the
signature of Lt. E.J. Ruppelt -- Edward J. Ruppelt, who would
become director of Project Blue Book within months and who later
wrote the most significant firsthand account of the Air Force's
UFO investigation apparatus. His administrative involvement,
even in a routing capacity, places this case squarely within
the institutional attention of the people who ran American
military UFO investigation during its most serious period.
The direction reversal reported by Warren is among the most
difficult details to accommodate with a conventional
explanation. A jet aircraft at 5,000 feet changing heading
would present a turning arc to an observer in another aircraft
at the same altitude. Warren described an object that was
stationary -- not diminishing or approaching -- and then simply
began moving in the opposite direction. This is not consistent
with jet aircraft behavior, and it is not addressed in any
document in this file that proposes the jet-reflection
hypothesis.
The complete absence of acoustic and vapor signatures across
both sightings also resists the jet explanation. In October
1951 the fastest American operational jets were loud. Sonner,
positioned at an active regional airport with a trained ear
for aircraft, heard nothing.
BOTTOM LINE
This is one of the more compelling cases in the archive on the
merits of the witness pool alone. The primary observer was a
trained aviation professional with documented skeptical
credentials, observing under ideal daytime conditions from a
fixed known position. The corroborating witness was an airborne
pilot who added independent details -- particularly the apparent
hover and direction reversal -- that the first observer could
not have provided from the ground. Neither observer identified
what they saw. The Air Force, after routing the case through
multiple commands and referencing it to Project Grudge, recorded
it as UNIDENTIFIED.
The jet-reflection hypothesis offered in the Air Intelligence
Report is not unreasonable as a general category of explanation
for some daytime silver-object sightings in 1951, but it does
not fit the specific reported behaviors here: no sound, no
trail, apparent stationarity at altitude, and reversal of
direction without a visible turning arc. The record card
evaluator was right to reject the aircraft explanation, and
the UNIDENTIFIED label was honestly earned.
Whatever Sonner and Warren saw over Vigo County and Edgar
County on 9 October 1951, it moved faster than they could
explain, left no trace a radar or human ear could catch, and
ended its observed flight south of an Army chemical weapons
plant. The Air Force could not explain it. Neither can this
file.
================================================================
END OF DOCUMENT
================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------