April 1967 | South Hill, Virginia
I
PROJE CT 10073 RECORD
April 1967 | Toms River, New Jersey
•
..
• .. .. ...--- ·- ....... . --· ....·--- ... • • - - ••• 0
April 1967 | Westmont, Illinois
•
• • •
-
April 1967 | Triangle, Virginia
•
,
-- -
•
April 1967 | Hadley, Massachusetts
•
•
------------·--- -. ------ ---·-::--------------------
April 1967 | Tempe, Arizona
•
•
• •
April 1967 | Illegible, Iowa
•
April 1967 | Hilo, Hawaii
•
•
•
.----·--
f 1. f'•A ~f
__ ..~:~uP
T t.,..:
April 1967 | Westway, Hartdale, New York
•
'
---------------·--- ~- _..........______
• •
April 1967 | Cheviot, Ohio
,
•
,
~
t
____ ____
1.. !'Jt.:
..
April 1967 | Newburgh, New York
•
I ,
..
April 1967 | Ventnor, Newjersey
•
•
•
April 1967 | Denville, New Jersey
April 1967 | Fairplay, Colorado
~~ -
April 1967 | Tucson, Arizona
- -
~
- -- - - ~~._
~= - -- - -
April 1967 | South Dartmouth, Massachusetts
•
•
•
•
•
•
May 1967 | St, Louis, Missouri | Incident #11718
• •
Fi1 e 1171 •
M:.iy ( , .,
St . Louis , M sso1ri
5 r~t') or-
•
May 1967 | Webster, Maine | Incident #11732
F'1 117 ;>
11.'ty 1') ' 1Qt 7
W 1:. ter, f.~ i nA
4 l' o• o .
•
May 1967 | Brindisi, Italy | Incident #11737
•
F"lo 11?17
r y 1, 1 or?
Br · nd ist, t · ly
.., p" otoo
•
May 1967 | Lexington, Kentucky | Incident #11749
Fil 117l9
Hay 19, 1o( 7
I e>· · ng'ton, Kf'r"ucky
1. I hotos
•
May 1967 | Brockway, Pennsylvania
. . -
----------------
P.~O JECT 10073 RECORD
r-------- ---- - .--- ·---..-------- . _..._.;..
May 1967 | Williamston, Michigan
•
. ' .
-
- -· - - - ---- . •
May 1967 | Cincinnati, Ohio
•
.' .
•
r TL1 !-t r 63 O-:i7i tTDE) r'''""""' " ~ <~tt l · ·n • " ' ' " '" , ,,m •n• r b~ .
May 1967 | Kettering, Ohio
• •
I
•
). • •
' 1. ( )I
May 1967 | St, Louis, Missouri
•
• •
·-·- - - -- -------------------------------------
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
__ _________,________________________________
,..:.·: ...._ ,, __ P ROJECT 100/ 3 RE COR D .__,
, ~
11. D.~ Hi • ,·...... E GR OUP 2. LOCATION /l(12"( I
:; I I
i __22.._~<:i~67 26/0410Z Salt l.ake Ci ty, utah (2 \'li tno sses )
j 3. :}0Uf~Ct:: •· 10. CON CLUSION - - .. ,.. ..
1_ -= i vil i a n
C::: Probabl e , (AIRCRAFT')
4. NUMBE R OF OBJECTS There i s nothing to indicate t~at the object could not have bu ~
a satellite or an aircraft with its landing lights on, but b9ca~~
One o-r the direction of tra vel it is most li kely to have h e An An A/C'I~
5. LENGTH Or OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALY SIS
'