April 1967 | Mesa, Arizona | Incident #11635
Fi e 1H.,
Ar-1, 'J,
~ e !1. , A... i z na
phi') 0
April 1967 | Salem, Virginia | Incident #11669
•
Fil ll(i: q
r.r.ll?,l 7
~ 1 "1 , Virr:inia
lL, I ho O"'
•
April 1967 | Ramey AFB, Puerto Rico | Incident #11683
•
F 'le 11 3
-i l 1( ' 1 I 7
P mey ~p , Puerto 1 ico
to
•
April 1967 | Titusville, Florida | Incident #11686
•
·-- .
F'i le 1( f\
f, pri 1 '?./. , l9t 7
Ti usvill , r' orirla.
8 photor
•
April 1967 | Newburgh, New York | Incident #11699
•
•
Fil 11€99
Ap'"i l 30 , 1 (7
f I ho+o~
•
April 1967 | South Darmouth, Massachusetts | Incident #11702
•
-- .
FilP- P702
A ril , 1 7
uu~tmo h, M . t c~u et ~
l ph • op
•
April 1967 | South Wellington, Texas
•
April 1967 | Shively, Kentucky
April 1967 | Location Illegible
April 1967 | Springfield, Ohio
•
•
II I.
. -·
•?'· ~F
-· TIM!:
. GROUP
April 1967 | Colorado Springs, Colorado
•
•
----------------------·-
. •
April 1967 | Roseville, Michigan
• •
•
•
April 1967 | Camden, Ohio
•
•
P ROJ~CT 10
April 1967 | Kalida, Ohio
•
•
•
April 1967 | Youngstown, Ohio
•
•
I
April 1967 | Hatboro, Pennsylvania
•
------
i.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------·------
i;: ·;1.\
April 1967 | Wheeling, West Virginia
•
April 1967 | Denver, Colorado
•
•
April 1967 | Queens Village, New York
•
:. - · ;~7 --.~. ··~ =L ·~~--~.~l.~L-0-C
-.-
April 1967 | St, Joseph, Michigan
•
•
•
------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------
April 1967 | Plaza, Colorado
•
•
•
April 1967 | Westminister, Colorado
•
•
April 1967 | Oldbridge, Newjersey
•
•
P~OJi:CT
April 1967 | Toledo, Ohio
•
)
•
-----------------------------~--------------------------~
f
April 1967 | Turnersfalls, Massachusetts
•
. : . -----------
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
__ _________,________________________________
,..:.·: ...._ ,, __ P ROJECT 100/ 3 RE COR D .__,
, ~
11. D.~ Hi • ,·...... E GR OUP 2. LOCATION /l(12"( I
:; I I
i __22.._~<:i~67 26/0410Z Salt l.ake Ci ty, utah (2 \'li tno sses )
j 3. :}0Uf~Ct:: •· 10. CON CLUSION - - .. ,.. ..
1_ -= i vil i a n
C::: Probabl e , (AIRCRAFT')
4. NUMBE R OF OBJECTS There i s nothing to indicate t~at the object could not have bu ~
a satellite or an aircraft with its landing lights on, but b9ca~~
One o-r the direction of tra vel it is most li kely to have h e An An A/C'I~
5. LENGTH Or OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALY SIS
'