GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
Date Unknown | Kent, England
4 pp
Date Unknown | NE Atlantic, Azores
13 pp
Date Unknown | Tsu Shima, Japan
4 pp
Date Unknown | Southern Pines, North Carolina
11 pp
'
Date Unknown | Columbia South Carolina | Incident #143
INCIDENT #143 8 pp
Date Unknown | Location Illegible | Incident #189
INCIDENT #189 15 pp
Date Unknown | Location Illegible | Incident #180
INCIDENT #180 28 pp
Date Unknown | Location Illegible | Incident #181
INCIDENT #181 35 pp
' • • -
Date Unknown | Location Illegible | Incident #182
INCIDENT #182 38 pp
• ifI I
Date Unknown | Location Illegible | Incident #184
INCIDENT #184 27 pp
Date Unknown | Azores | Incident #201
INCIDENT #201 17 pp
' • f
Date Unknown | Location Illegible | Incident #213
INCIDENT #213 17 pp
I • • \
Date Unknown | Athens, Ohio
12 pp
Date Unknown | Havarre, Ohio
87 pp
? i~uJcc-
Date Unknown | Painesville, Ohio
12 pp
' •
Date Unknown | Amityville, Ny
3 pp
• , •
Date Unknown | San Burnadine, California
5 pp
• I I' .I ' I
Date Unknown | Location Illegible
24 pp
F ' le 4750 Miy 2 , 1957 Edw ra s , AFR , Cal fo;·r. . 22 pho .,
Date Unknown | Wilmington, Ohio
18 pp
• • •
Date Unknown | Dayton, Ohio, Illegible
22 pp
Date Unknown | Miami, Florida
11 pp
Date Unknown | Wilmington, Delaware
7 pp
• • • • ··•. ··"'.. v-J ::.-c....: ·H.
Date Unknown | Fryeburg, Maine
21 pp
• • •
Date Unknown | Traverse City, Michigan
34 pp
. ·------ .--··--.------------~,-----------------------------------------------~.--- --~----------- 1 ".:' • •••• ~ ~ C uF I 2. LOCAT ION
Date Unknown | SE of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
15 pp
• , • I • PROJECT 10073 PECORD CARD
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-02-8550110-Schenectady-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Schenectady, New York
DATE February 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8550110
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 10
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD co I • !)A -E · T I'.\E GROUP 2. LOCAT IO N !--~:_o__ 67__________________+-_____s_~_-_~_e_~_e~~~·_~_a_d~y~,~:_:_e_.._·_Y_o__r k________________________l__~_~_i_t_n_e_s__s__________~ 3. :. ~I Ji C'!: 10. CONC LUSION . 1 -. -- '-'- -. .,---- - .. ------------------~ ;;... :r.s~~fici en t datq for evaluation I I. 1-I:!I ' C'.E R OF OBJECTS • 11. BRIEF SU.'-ri.MARY AND AN ALYSIS 3 ~ inute s Object. had a :!or.le ?.t th~ top a nd a r ound. li~ht i."1t h3 I{.. 1 f ?E OF OBSERVATION f r or.t . The li6ht ch!lnged f r o:n r eddis~ or .:jnge t~1~:1 to g~een . ~he observer stated tha t the ob jec t hov er ed, Ir:;- ~ .r~ ~·.,...,.. o,J ~- • - ,-.;- ·=-· ·1 - _ l.. swooJ:ed do·,.m bahind t r ees, and zoomed a•r;::...y • . ·.. it!1out 7.