March 1967 | Mt, Airy, North Carolina
• •
.
.. •
March 1967 | Grand Forks, North Dakota
.. •
•
'
..
March 1967 | Farming, Michigan
March 1967 | Corvallis, Oregon
•
•
March 1967 | Seguin, Texas
•
• •
..
March 1967 | Detroit, Michigan
• • •
..
March 1967 | Grossepointwoods, Michigan
•
..
March 1967 | Springhill, Kansas
. • •
March 1967 | Kilborne, Illinois
March 1967 | Kirksville, Missouri
•
•
..
March 1967 | Mount Prospect, Illinois
March 1967 | Tawas, Michigan
------~.---------------··--------------------------------~-----------------
•
March 1967 | Galesburg, Moline, Illinois
•
March 1967 | Morgantown, Westvirginia
•
March 1967 | Toledo, Ohio
•
•
-----------
\1. -
•• --
March 1967 | Mescalero, New Mexico | Incident #11437
Fi 1 f' 114'37
M rch=' , 19E7
MC'"'C' lr:ro , 'Jew 'lC'xico
2 Jhot'>s
•
March 1967 | Junauska, North Carolina | Incident #11484
Fi P lL c.
hrc 1 , 1 ,7
Juna'J. lb, ·~o.,·" Cur lin
2
•
March 1967 | Torrence, California | Incident #11489
•
File lli.R
~~ rc 1 , 19( 7
Torr nee , r 1~r rn '
ho
•
March 1967 | Lexington, Missouri | Incident #11494
:fi l 14 '·
Mr-ircl 12 , 1q(7
Lex'nr~ n, ~jssouri
5 photos
•
March 1967 | Youngstown, Ohio | Incident #11537
i lP. l 5?.7
.,..ch 2. , l 7
Yo mr to n , Ohio
{ protos
•
March 1967 | King of Prussia, Pennsylvania | Incident #11552
Fi1P 11
t1lirC'h '?L., 1 "7
Kinr f Prussia, P~nn~ylv n'a
7 p~otos
•
March 1967 | Bergenfield, New Jersey | Incident #11583
FilP 11581
1 rch 1 , lQ(?
I e rgenf:i.cl:l , ·e.._, Jr>rncy
5 ph tos
•
March 1967 | Gladstone, Michigan
•
March 1967 | Holland, Missouri
March 1967 | Denver, Colorado
• • •
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
__ _________,________________________________
,..:.·: ...._ ,, __ P ROJECT 100/ 3 RE COR D .__,
, ~
11. D.~ Hi • ,·...... E GR OUP 2. LOCATION /l(12"( I
:; I I
i __22.._~<:i~67 26/0410Z Salt l.ake Ci ty, utah (2 \'li tno sses )
j 3. :}0Uf~Ct:: •· 10. CON CLUSION - - .. ,.. ..
1_ -= i vil i a n
C::: Probabl e , (AIRCRAFT')
4. NUMBE R OF OBJECTS There i s nothing to indicate t~at the object could not have bu ~
a satellite or an aircraft with its landing lights on, but b9ca~~
One o-r the direction of tra vel it is most li kely to have h e An An A/C'I~
5. LENGTH Or OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALY SIS
'