GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
February 1967 | Elkins Park, Pennsylvania
24 pp
• • • • • •·-~- .-- -----------------------
February 1967 | Location Illegible
148 pp
• .. ' ( •
February 1967 | Gastbury, Connecticut
3 pp
February 1967 | Condon, Oregon
12 pp
• • •
February 1967 | North Andover, Massachusetts
11 pp
• • • •
February 1967 | Winston Salem, North Carolina
5 pp
• • •
February 1967 | Oxford, Wisconsin
11 pp
• \ • • .)
February 1967 | Sacramento, California
4 pp
• .,·
February 1967 | Saint Marys, Ohio
16 pp
• • •
February 1967 | Reeder, North Dakota
Astro (Venus) 15 pp
• • • • •
February 1967 | Margate, New Jersey
8 pp
• • --- -·- .- . .. . - - ----·- - - . - · ,. ..--. ...... ___ .._. __ . 1. 0 A
February 1967 | Englewood, Colorado
5 pp
• • ..
February 1967 | Kingsland, Texas
4 pp
• ' •
February 1967 | Kirksville, Missouri
10 pp
• • • ~1. DA-~~---------------r-----------------------------------------
February 1967 | Newburg, Missouri
3 pp
• 0 •
February 1967 | Glasgow AFB, Montana
MILITARY 35 pp
,• ,•
February 1967 | Duluth, Minnesota
5 pp
• • • '
February 1967 | Edinburg, Texas
5 pp
• • 1~ OA TF. : TIME GROL;P 2. LOCATION
February 1967 | Pocahontas, Arkansas
4 pp
I - • •
February 1967 | Sioux City, Iowa
14 pp
• •
February 1967 | Urbana, Illinois
21 pp
• • • •
February 1967 | Fargo, North Dakota
40 pp
• ... , • •
February 1967 | Fargo, No, Dakota
1 pp
• , • • • •
February 1967 | Livonia, Michigan
11 pp
February 1967 | Glassboro, New Jersey
11 pp
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-09-7279438-SaltLakeCity-Utah.pdf
LOCATION Salt Lake City, Utah
DATE September 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 7279438
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 14
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • __ _________,________________________________ ,..:.·: ...._ ,, __ P ROJECT 100/ 3 RE COR D .__, , ~ 11. D.~ Hi • ,·...... E GR OUP 2. LOCATION /l(12"( I :; I I i __22.._~<:i~67 26/0410Z Salt l.ake Ci ty, utah (2 \'li tno sses ) j 3. :}0Uf~Ct:: •· 10. CON CLUSION - - .. ,.. .. 1_ -= i vil i a n C::: Probabl e , (AIRCRAFT') 4. NUMBE R OF OBJECTS There i s nothing to indicate t~at the object could not have bu ~ a satellite or an aircraft with its landing lights on, but b9ca~~ One o-r the direction of tra vel it is most li kely to have h e An An A/C'I~ 5. LENGTH Or OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALY SIS '