GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
February 1967 | Elkins Park, Pennsylvania
24 pp
• • • • • •·-~- .-- -----------------------
February 1967 | Location Illegible
148 pp
• .. ' ( •
February 1967 | Gastbury, Connecticut
3 pp
February 1967 | Condon, Oregon
12 pp
• • •
February 1967 | North Andover, Massachusetts
11 pp
• • • •
February 1967 | Winston Salem, North Carolina
5 pp
• • •
February 1967 | Oxford, Wisconsin
11 pp
• \ • • .)
February 1967 | Sacramento, California
4 pp
• .,·
February 1967 | Saint Marys, Ohio
16 pp
• • •
February 1967 | Reeder, North Dakota
Astro (Venus) 15 pp
• • • • •
February 1967 | Margate, New Jersey
8 pp
• • --- -·- .- . .. . - - ----·- - - . - · ,. ..--. ...... ___ .._. __ . 1. 0 A
February 1967 | Englewood, Colorado
5 pp
• • ..
February 1967 | Kingsland, Texas
4 pp
• ' •
February 1967 | Kirksville, Missouri
10 pp
• • • ~1. DA-~~---------------r-----------------------------------------
February 1967 | Newburg, Missouri
3 pp
• 0 •
February 1967 | Glasgow AFB, Montana
MILITARY 35 pp
,• ,•
February 1967 | Duluth, Minnesota
5 pp
• • • '
February 1967 | Edinburg, Texas
5 pp
• • 1~ OA TF. : TIME GROL;P 2. LOCATION
February 1967 | Pocahontas, Arkansas
4 pp
I - • •
February 1967 | Sioux City, Iowa
14 pp
• •
February 1967 | Urbana, Illinois
21 pp
• • • •
February 1967 | Fargo, North Dakota
40 pp
• ... , • •
February 1967 | Fargo, No, Dakota
1 pp
• , • • • •
February 1967 | Livonia, Michigan
11 pp
February 1967 | Glassboro, New Jersey
11 pp
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-02-8550110-Schenectady-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Schenectady, New York
DATE February 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8550110
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 10
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD co I • !)A -E · T I'.\E GROUP 2. LOCAT IO N !--~:_o__ 67__________________+-_____s_~_-_~_e_~_e~~~·_~_a_d~y~,~:_:_e_.._·_Y_o__r k________________________l__~_~_i_t_n_e_s__s__________~ 3. :. ~I Ji C'!: 10. CONC LUSION . 1 -. -- '-'- -. .,---- - .. ------------------~ ;;... :r.s~~fici en t datq for evaluation I I. 1-I:!I ' C'.E R OF OBJECTS • 11. BRIEF SU.'-ri.MARY AND AN ALYSIS 3 ~ inute s Object. had a :!or.le ?.t th~ top a nd a r ound. li~ht i."1t h3 I{.. 1 f ?E OF OBSERVATION f r or.t . The li6ht ch!lnged f r o:n r eddis~ or .:jnge t~1~:1 to g~een . ~he observer stated tha t the ob jec t hov er ed, Ir:;- ~ .r~ ~·.,...,.. o,J ~- • - ,-.;- ·=-· ·1 - _ l.. swooJ:ed do·,.m bahind t r ees, and zoomed a•r;::...y • . ·.. it!1out 7.