OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
-.
,. •
r·~~·----------~----~~P~R~O~JE~C~T--100_7_3_R_E_c_o_Ro__c_AR_o_____·__~------------~
· --~ '
1 12. CONCLUSION S
.J, DATE; ( .. 2. LOCATION (
5 Apr 52 · 1-linnd, Florida. 0 Wo~ Balloon
__!-.,~·-~--,-~••L-------.____1_ 0 P robobl y Boll oon
3. DATE•TIME Gh OUP 4. TYPEOFOBS:-:::£:-:-R-:-V:-:-
A-.:T...-:
----------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION
File: 1952-04-6311719-Miami-Florida.pdf
Transcribed from document image by Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
FIELD 1 -- DATE: 5 Apr 52
FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: Miami, Florida
FIELD 3 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: Local 2115 EST / GMT 06/0215Z
[Note: 2115 EST = 0215Z next day (6 Apr),
confirmed by the GMT entry.]
FIELD 4 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION:
Ground-Visual [X]
Ground-Radar [ ]
Air-Visual [ ]
Air-Intercept Radar [ ]
FIELD 5 -- PHOTOS: No
FIELD 6 -- SOURCE: Amateur astronomer and son
FIELD 7 -- LENGTH OF OBS: 1 second
FIELD 8 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: 4
FIELD 9 -- COURSE: [Not recorded on form]
[West to east per attached report and
heading 90 degrees per Status Report #7]
FIELD 10 -- BRIEF SUMMARY:
Dark-opaque color. Circular. Straight and level maneuvers.
FIELD 11 -- COMMENTS:
Source observed 4 objects pass the full moon. One object
was more plainly seen was 1/2 moon's diameter, had sharply
defined leading edge and was opaque. Other object, did not
pass directly in front of the full moon.
FIELD 12 -- CONCLUSIONS: Other [handwritten notation, illegible] /
Insufficient Data for Evaluation [X]
Form: ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 52)
================================================================
SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS (this file)
================================================================
1. EXTRACT FROM STATUS REPORT #7 -- Date: 5 Apr 52, Time: 2115 EST,
Miami, Fla. Length: Not Reported. Sound/Speed/Altitude: Unknown.
Heading: 90 degrees. Source: Civilians. Action: No conclusions.
Description: "Four dark shapes passed across face of moon, objects
were circular, dark, opaque and invisible except when outlined
against moon."
2. AF FORM 112-PART I (Report No. AIR No. WIN 2-52, from 435th Troop
Carrier Wing (M); prepared by John H. Sharpe, Major, USAF;
date of report 16 April 1952; date of information 5 April 1952;
evaluation C3; source: Civilian Observer) -- Full narrative of
the sighting. Observer identified in the report as Mr. Van Derear
(name appears in text and sketch attribution). Intelligence
assessment by 435th Wing Intelligence Officer is included.
3. AF FORM 112-PART II (continuation) -- Includes the Wing Intelligence
Officer's full assessment of Mr. Van Derear's credibility and
character, and the absence of corroborating witnesses.
4. OBSERVER SKETCH (1 Incl.) -- Free-hand sketch attributed to
Mr. Van Derear depicting the moon (large circle) with a dark
circular object partially overlapping its face. Labeled "FADE OUT
AT EDGE" with arrow indicating the object's trailing corona.
Direction arrow marked "E" (East) with time notation 2115.
File/form reference number F437285 appears on sketch.
5. NOTE ON BUNDLED KOREA DOCUMENTS: This PDF also contains Air
Intelligence Information Report IR-131-52 from 66 Bm Sq
Intelligence, 44 Bm Wing, LGAFB, Louisiana -- a debriefing of
Korean combat crew returnees covering Nov 1951 to Apr 1952,
approved by Lt Col Theodore I. Pascoe, Director of Intelligence.
This report concerns entirely separate observations at Naha AFB
and Kadena AFB, Okinawa (5 April 1952, approximately 2400 hours),
and has no connection to the Miami case. It appears bundled in
this file, likely due to the shared date. The Kadena observations
(five elliptical objects at estimated 1000 knots, and a separate
maneuvering light observed over the base for ten minutes) are not
analyzed here and would merit their own eval under a Kadena AFB
case number.
================================================================
SEARCH INDEX TERMS
================================================================
Miami Florida Dade County 1952 April civilian amateur astronomer
full moon silhouette dark opaque circular objects formation
west east heading ninety degrees moonlit night haze ring
Van Derear artist observer son nine year old child witness
435th Troop Carrier Wing Sharpe WIN 2-52 AFOIN
insufficient data for evaluation not identified
four objects disc dark leading edge corona fuzzy
one second duration no sound no light no reflection
Status Report 7 Kadena AFB Okinawa Korea misfiled bundled
C3 evaluation ground visual silhouette
================================================================
CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6
================================================================
CASE OVERVIEW
On the night of 5 April 1952 at 2115 EST, an amateur astronomer
and his nine-year-old son were lying in hammocks in their Miami
yard, watching an almost-full moon through a hazy atmosphere. In
the course of roughly one second, four dark circular objects
passed through or near the moon's face. No photographs were taken.
No other observers reported the same objects. The official
conclusion is Insufficient Data for Evaluation.
THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION
"Insufficient Data for Evaluation" is the recorded conclusion, with
a secondary notation in the Other field that is handwritten and
illegible in the surviving scan. The Wing Intelligence Officer who
interviewed Mr. Van Derear found no reason to doubt his account
and rated him as better qualified than the average observer. The
Status Report entry records "No conclusions." The case was not
resolved to any conventional explanation, but neither was it
classified UNIDENTIFIED. Given the brevity of the observation and
the lack of corroborating witnesses, the classification is honest.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS
The primary observer, Mr. Van Derear, is described in the AF Form
112 as a competent artist who had been observing the sky at every
available opportunity for three or four years in the hope of seeing
flying saucers. He owned a small telescope but was not using it.
The moon was almost full and surrounded by an atmospheric haze ring.
There were no clouds.
The observation itself lasted roughly one second for the object
that transited the moon's face most directly. Four dark shapes in
total passed at or near the moon, crossing from west to east in
what appeared to be formation. The most carefully observed object
blocked out approximately half the moon's apparent diameter -- an
angular size of roughly 0.25 degrees. It was completely opaque,
perfectly circular (per the father), and completely silent. The
leading edge was sharply defined. A fuzzy corona surrounded
approximately 300 degrees of the object's outline -- meaning only
the leading edge was crisp, while the remaining three-quarters of
the perimeter faded into an indistinct halo.
The son saw one of the objects as an irregular shape rather than
circular. The intelligence officer regarded the father's observation
as more reliable on the grounds that he was a trained artist
"accustomed to noticing shapes."
After the sighting, Mr. Van Derear retrieved his telescope and
searched the sky for some time without finding anything else of
interest.
WHAT GIVES ME PAUSE -- AND WHERE THE CASE SOFTENS
Several details argue for a mundane explanation, and one argues
against it.
For the mundane side: April is peak northward migration season in
Florida. Large wading birds -- herons, ibises, spoonbills -- migrate
at night in loose flocks, sometimes in V-formations or staggered
lines. Viewed against a bright moon at altitude, a large bird would
appear as a dark silhouette. The son's observation of an "irregular"
shape is consistent with a bird in flight. The one-second transit
time is consistent with a fast-flying bird at low to moderate
altitude passing through the narrow column of the moon's disc. The
fuzzy corona on the trailing 300 degrees of outline could be the
blurred impression of beating wings, tail feathers, and the general
non-circularity of a bird's body at a distance.
Against that: the father's perception of a "perfectly circular"
shape. An amateur astronomer trained as a competent artist, who has
spent years looking at the sky through a telescope, is someone with
reason to be trusted on geometric shapes. He did not report an
uncertain shape; he described a precisely circular opaque disc. The
sketch he drew shows a clearly bounded circular object. That is not
what a flying heron looks like at any distance.
The asymmetric sharpness is also genuinely interesting -- a leading
edge sharp, trailing three-quarters fuzzy. This is not what you
would expect from a rigid circular disc (which should present a
uniformly sharp edge), nor quite what you would expect from a bird
in smooth level flight. It could describe something passing through
the haze layer at speed, with turbulence or diffraction softening
the trailing edge.
There is also the psychological detail worth holding lightly in
both directions: this was a man who had spent years wanting to see
flying saucers. That primes identification in one direction. But
he said he was disappointed, that they seemed "almost a natural
manifestation, except for the perfectly circular shape and the fact
that they appeared to be flying in formation." A true believer
expecting spectacle would not have been disappointed. The
understated, almost puzzled quality of his account suggests he was
describing what he actually saw rather than what he hoped to see.
BOTTOM LINE
This case is thin by the standards of the Blue Book record. One
observation pair, one second of observation for the clearest object,
no photographs, no corroborating witnesses, and no trajectory or
altitude data. The conclusion of Insufficient Data for Evaluation
is defensible and probably correct.
The most likely mundane explanation is migratory birds silhouetted
against the moon, with the father's "circular" impression being a
misread of a bird's body in brief transit. The son's "irregular"
description is more consistent with birds than with discs. But
the father was a trained observer of shapes who knew the difference
between irregular and circular, and his disappointment at the
mundaneness of the experience does not read as someone confabulating
saucers out of herons.
The case does not rise to UNIDENTIFIED under any reasonable standard.
It also does not fully close. It sits where the official conclusion
put it: not enough data to say.
================================================================
END OF DOCUMENT
================================================================
GlitchyMatrix.com/bluebook/
----------------------------------------------------------------