January 1967 | Mt, Clemens, Michigan
, t
January 1967 | Canon, New Mexico
•
January 1967 | Roseville, California
• J
January 1967 | Fair Oaks, California
• •
•
P ROJ ECT 1007J
January 1967 | Westoverafb, Massachusetts
n
•
PROJECT 10073 REC
January 1967 | Warner Robins, Georgia
I
• • •
PR
January 1967 | Charleston, South Carolina
•
January 1967 | Austin, Texas
• •
Pt<UJt:~l
January 1967 | Griffithville, Arkansas
•
••
January 1967 | Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
,
. . \
•
January 1967 | Elk Creek, Missouri
.' '
I
P ~O JECY 10073 F<EC0 :1D
;-,-. -c-:.·,·
January 1967 | Frankfort, Kentucky
.,
••
. ' 1'~ :~ ..
Crn
..:.- -----------------------~
NU!.-\BER o;: OQJECTS
I. Sev~ r =.: e. 0 tJ £.
~:i.-L~E~N;C~T~H~C~~~C
January 1967 | Mount Carmel, Pennsylvania
• •
-
January 1967 | Lafayatte Hill, Pennsylvania
• •
•
. ___--·.·-··
1.
.....
!H ; : . T IM!! GRO UP
January 1967 | Boise, Idaho
,.
'
• • PROJECT 10073 RECORD
January 1967 | Columbus, Kansas
' , •
•
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
. . ..
January 1967 | Dunbar, West Virginia
• •
. . .. ' . • •
..:..;...,
January 1967 | Middletown, Kentucky
.f •
.- -- ---------~-~------···--------
PRO
January 1967 | Issaquah, Washington
• I •
PROJECT 100/J RECORU
~ Al F. :TI-,~-=-.-
G-~-
O-U-P---
January 1967 | Kirksville, Missouri
- .
-1-.-n-A-·1-r···TIMf~-R-O_U_P----~2-.-L-O_C_A_T_IO-N--------------------------·I ~--··~
20 J~; n 67 ··· {o30~
January 1967 | Salem, Ohio
•
\
P:\:OJ;:cr 1007~ RECO~D
January 1967 | Spencer, Indiana
•
'
P ROJ I:C'I IUU/.> t<l: \..vrw
I
~I - ·-\--------..,-------------------------------
1. OA 1 f. • i IME
January 1967 | Mid, Western Pacific Area
• ,
January 1967 | Kansas City, Missouri
. "
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
January 1967 | Lake City, Pennsylvania
• •
.. .. .. ... - - ... .. . . .. • •
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. •
• PROJECT 10073 RECORD
co I
•
!)A -E · T I'.\E GROUP 2. LOCAT IO N
!--~:_o__ 67__________________+-_____s_~_-_~_e_~_e~~~·_~_a_d~y~,~:_:_e_.._·_Y_o__r k________________________l__~_~_i_t_n_e_s__s__________~
3. :. ~I Ji C'!: 10. CONC LUSION
. 1 -. --
'-'-
-. .,----
- ..
------------------~
;;...
:r.s~~fici en t datq for evaluation
I I. 1-I:!I ' C'.E R OF OBJECTS
•
11. BRIEF SU.'-ri.MARY AND AN ALYSIS
3 ~ inute s
Object. had a :!or.le ?.t th~ top a nd a r ound. li~ht i."1t h3
I{.. 1 f ?E OF OBSERVATION f r or.t . The li6ht ch!lnged f r o:n r eddis~ or .:jnge t~1~:1 to
g~een . ~he observer stated tha t the ob jec t hov er ed,
Ir:;-
~ .r~ ~·.,...,..
o,J ~- • -
,-.;-
·=-· ·1
- _ l..
swooJ:ed do·,.m bahind t r ees, and zoomed a•r;::...y • . ·.. it!1out
7.