GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
December 1966 | Bear Mountain State Park, New York | Incident #11229
INCIDENT #11229 4 pp
File 220 De a e~ter lR, 19(f Pear Mom"" in ~·ta c :R ...k , ., w -:-k 3 pho ()S
December 1966 | St, Paul, Minnesota | Incident #11242
INCIDENT #11242 6 pp
Fi 1{\ 1121.2 Dece~bPr 2? , )066 St . Paul , tt.i.nnesota 5 photos
December 1966 | Brandon, Florida
3 pp
December 1966 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
9 pp
December 1966 | Bessemer, Michigan
3 pp
, ......
December 1966 | Beachwood, New Jersey
12 pp
' ..a •.
December 1966 | San Mateo, California
4 pp
----~-- ·
December 1966 | Hopedale, Massachusetts
11 pp
• •
December 1966 | Honda Canyon Road, California, 12037 W, 3437 N
5 pp
December 1966 | Minneapolis, Minnesota
4 pp
December 1966 | Kloten, North Dakota
5 pp
December 1966 | Holly Hill, Florida
14 pp
,
December 1966 | Houma, Louisiana
6 pp
• . , ..
December 1966 | Denver, Colorado
8 pp
• I •
December 1966 | Springfield, Ohio
8 pp
• ,
December 1966 | Californiaand Nevada
38 pp
-
December 1966 | Johnson City, Tennessee
4 pp
December 1966 | Phan Rang, Republic Viet Nam
6 pp
• • ' - ---- - .....
December 1966 | New York City, New York
3 pp
• •
December 1966 | Miles City, Montana
Multiple 14 pp
f
December 1966 | Boulder, Colorado
Multiple 5 pp
December 1966 | Dallas, Georgia
Multiple 2 pp
... ..
December 1966 | Dayton, Ohio
Multiple 184 pp
December 1966 | Elmer, New Jersey
7 pp
December 1966 | Kettering, Ohio
8 pp
• • • - -·· - . . . ..... . ----
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-02-8550110-Schenectady-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Schenectady, New York
DATE February 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8550110
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 10
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD co I • !)A -E · T I'.\E GROUP 2. LOCAT IO N !--~:_o__ 67__________________+-_____s_~_-_~_e_~_e~~~·_~_a_d~y~,~:_:_e_.._·_Y_o__r k________________________l__~_~_i_t_n_e_s__s__________~ 3. :. ~I Ji C'!: 10. CONC LUSION . 1 -. -- '-'- -. .,---- - .. ------------------~ ;;... :r.s~~fici en t datq for evaluation I I. 1-I:!I ' C'.E R OF OBJECTS • 11. BRIEF SU.'-ri.MARY AND AN ALYSIS 3 ~ inute s Object. had a :!or.le ?.t th~ top a nd a r ound. li~ht i."1t h3 I{.. 1 f ?E OF OBSERVATION f r or.t . The li6ht ch!lnged f r o:n r eddis~ or .:jnge t~1~:1 to g~een . ~he observer stated tha t the ob jec t hov er ed, Ir:;- ~ .r~ ~·.,...,.. o,J ~- • - ,-.;- ·=-· ·1 - _ l.. swooJ:ed do·,.m bahind t r ees, and zoomed a•r;::...y • . ·.. it!1out 7.