GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
November 1966 | Union City, Georgia
12 pp
• • •
November 1966 | Oatman, Arizona
2 pp
• I • PROJECT 10073 RECORD 1.' -~~~~~~~------~~~~----
November 1966 | Austin, Texas
6 pp
- - - - - - -. •
November 1966 | Richland, Wash
Multiple 6 pp
• • .. •
November 1966 | 188 Nm North Eastof Wake Island
9 pp
November 1966 | Silver Springs, Maryland
6 pp
• - . •
November 1966 | Sparks, Georgia
6 pp
• • - - - - --··· .... - --·- ----·---PROJECT 10073 RECORD ·-··- ---- ~ ··- ... - --·- - - ---·- - -
November 1966 | Media, Pennsylvania
4 pp
• •
November 1966 | Los Angeles, California
5 pp
November 1966 | Columbus, Indiana
13 pp
• ' • '
November 1966 | Duluth, Minnesota
6 pp
• , (
November 1966 | San Pedro, California
46 pp
-~--~-~- . •
December 1966 | Monroe, New York
5 pp
• --------~ . ~----------~------~---- '
December 1966 | San Diego, California
7 pp
December 1966 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
7 pp
• ' ' ··- ~- ·-- "'. : ·).-.1£ ··
December 1966 | Lakewood, Colorado
5 pp
December 1966 | Englewood, Colorado
6 pp
• •
December 1966 | Klamath Falls, Oregon
5 pp
December 1966 | Elkins Park, Pennsylvania
8 pp
• - '.
December 1966 | Monroe, Oregon
13 pp
• \ -- -- - .- - . -- -
December 1966 | Memphis, Tennessee
7 pp
\ • •
December 1966 | Corvallis, Oregon
14 pp
• • "
December 1966 | Mc Clellan AFB, California
MILITARY 44 pp
,
December 1966 | Allentown, Pennsylvania
4 pp
• • • P
December 1966 | Wichita Falls, Texas | Incident #11222
INCIDENT #11222 2 pp
• Fi lo ] 1222 December l Q)f6 Wichi •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-02-8550110-Schenectady-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Schenectady, New York
DATE February 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8550110
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 10
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD co I • !)A -E · T I'.\E GROUP 2. LOCAT IO N !--~:_o__ 67__________________+-_____s_~_-_~_e_~_e~~~·_~_a_d~y~,~:_:_e_.._·_Y_o__r k________________________l__~_~_i_t_n_e_s__s__________~ 3. :. ~I Ji C'!: 10. CONC LUSION . 1 -. -- '-'- -. .,---- - .. ------------------~ ;;... :r.s~~fici en t datq for evaluation I I. 1-I:!I ' C'.E R OF OBJECTS • 11. BRIEF SU.'-ri.MARY AND AN ALYSIS 3 ~ inute s Object. had a :!or.le ?.t th~ top a nd a r ound. li~ht i."1t h3 I{.. 1 f ?E OF OBSERVATION f r or.t . The li6ht ch!lnged f r o:n r eddis~ or .:jnge t~1~:1 to g~een . ~he observer stated tha t the ob jec t hov er ed, Ir:;- ~ .r~ ~·.,...,.. o,J ~- • - ,-.;- ·=-· ·1 - _ l.. swooJ:ed do·,.m bahind t r ees, and zoomed a•r;::...y • . ·.. it!1out 7.