GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
November 1966 | Fayetteville, North Carolina
4 pp
~--------~~--------------~~- . - •
November 1966 | Sandusky, Ohio
Multiple 68 pp
-------~- --- . ~---"'-~--~
November 1966 | Location Illegible
38 pp
- - - - - - - -. • • - • - •
November 1966 | Doylestown, Pennsylvania
9 pp
• • ~ t<UJt:l. I
November 1966 | Newtown, Pennsylvania
8 pp
\ 0 0 0
November 1966 | Greenville, South Carolina
8 pp
----~------- ~--------- . . •
November 1966 | Corpus Christi, Texas
5 pp
•• •
November 1966 | Lebanon, Ohio
16 pp
November 1966 | San Angelo, Texas
5 pp
• •
November 1966 | Sanford, Florida
5 pp
f f • ··-
November 1966 | Winter Park, Florida
4 pp
• • -- - ----------------
November 1966 | Canton, Ohio
8 pp
-
November 1966 | Glendale, Pennsylvania
8 pp
November 1966 | New York City, New York
44 pp
• •
November 1966 | Furlong, Penna
3 pp
• •
November 1966 | Warrington, Pennsylvania
9 pp
• ' •
November 1966 | Warwick, New York
5 pp
~----------~----------~~--~--. -- • • ,
November 1966 | Sacramento, California
3 pp
' • ,
November 1966 | Youngville, New York
6 pp
• •
November 1966 | Middletown, Pennsylvania
8 pp
• •
November 1966 | Yorktown, Virginia
6 pp
.·--- • .. - T:'·. -------------------
November 1966 | Rocklin, California
9 pp
November 1966 | Roswell, New Mexico
Multiple 4 pp
• • • ' -· ·- -- - ·------·----- - -----~ ---- -- t"t<UJt L. t 1
November 1966 | Natrona Heights, Pennsylvania
Multiple 10 pp
• • • • ·--· • .- . - .. -- -- --- --·- - - ·- . i
November 1966 | Colorado Springs, Colorado
23 pp
• • •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-02-8550110-Schenectady-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Schenectady, New York
DATE February 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8550110
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 10
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD co I • !)A -E · T I'.\E GROUP 2. LOCAT IO N !--~:_o__ 67__________________+-_____s_~_-_~_e_~_e~~~·_~_a_d~y~,~:_:_e_.._·_Y_o__r k________________________l__~_~_i_t_n_e_s__s__________~ 3. :. ~I Ji C'!: 10. CONC LUSION . 1 -. -- '-'- -. .,---- - .. ------------------~ ;;... :r.s~~fici en t datq for evaluation I I. 1-I:!I ' C'.E R OF OBJECTS • 11. BRIEF SU.'-ri.MARY AND AN ALYSIS 3 ~ inute s Object. had a :!or.le ?.t th~ top a nd a r ound. li~ht i."1t h3 I{.. 1 f ?E OF OBSERVATION f r or.t . The li6ht ch!lnged f r o:n r eddis~ or .:jnge t~1~:1 to g~een . ~he observer stated tha t the ob jec t hov er ed, Ir:;- ~ .r~ ~·.,...,.. o,J ~- • - ,-.;- ·=-· ·1 - _ l.. swooJ:ed do·,.m bahind t r ees, and zoomed a•r;::...y • . ·.. it!1out 7.