GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
November 1966 | Hankins, New York
5 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD | 1. DATE - TIME GROUP £3 lov. 66 | 3. SOURCE | | A Civilian an 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS 2 or 3 111. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS .
November 1966 | Monroe, New York
6 pp
| 2. LO CATE - TIME GROUP lo. concLusion BSERVATION |11, BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS TYPE OF Ground Visual ! 7. COURSE | _ Bastward 8. PHOTOS FORM a. ~~ PROJECT 16073 R
November 1966 | Port Washington, New York
5 pp
1 ky DATE - TIME GROUP Tro. ‘CONCLUSION Possible (AIRCRAFT), 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS rr notl ced a stationary ring ob ba ct above ily wooded area. The )
November 1966 | Blooming Grove, New York
5 pp
| uo | El | PROJECT GOs: RECTRO [3. source Cc ivil ian | 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS two | ————— —————— a a il RIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS | 5.
November 1966 | Magnolia, New Jersey
12 pp
| 3 Nov 66 4/010 El (i il — 4 SOURCE i] | b Civilian | S00 Yes ~ AR No 1 SN ec es a apn eS Si es ——— L FORM ; ". ~TD sep 3 0-329 (TDE) 10, comctuston
November 1966 | Memphis, Tennessee
5 pp
R0JECT 10073 RECORD PANE [2 Location | Memphis, Tennessee (1 witness) | | 3 Nov to Ee Ci a a a = — SE ey - a bo AREER 10. CONCLUSION Civilian |. NUMBER OF OB
November 1966 | Bradford, Ohio
19 pp
n - | |). DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. 4 Nov. 66 two witnesses Ea — i —— i — ————————— a i ki i —— i , — | — ——— ee —— — = ——— = SEE — ee 110. CONCLUSION | Civilian i Adrcraft{possi
November 1966 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
9 pp
| 2. LOCATION I | FRUJECUI IVu/s hELWURD I | | | v, — we Er ee ——— es = —————— 1 Fe Boe Ta See 5 lov 66 = — _— — — — Fr I | Ei [1 3. SOURCE CONCLUSION (other) INSUFFICIET
November 1966 | Dayton, Ohio
Multiple 76 pp
| — ~ re meme ee Sere | pAiE‘. TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION B® | 5 Nov 66 5/0435Z | Dayton, Ohio i — A — a i oo = Sai = 3. SOURCE B "CONCLUSION = —— de Ee — — SE — | 1. NUMBER
November 1966 | La Porte, Texas
12 pp
$1: | 2. LocaTioON TEE | ©. Nov La Porte, Texas one witness 13. “SOURCE 110. CONCLUSION 1 1 Civilian | Balloon(pes | 4. NUMBER OF OE \ JECTS 3 | Observer noted a cizar
November 1966 | Hibbing, Minnesota
11 pp
(1. DAT, TI4E GROUP C2 LOCATION Wado a plan | |4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS 9 LENGTH oF OBSERVATION. | XiNo_ ; 1 — — yg NENCE | P ROJI E CT 0073 R cCORD - i iB t HE
November 1966 | 74, 26 N, 118, 20 W, Atlantic
7 pp
~ |s. PHOTOS ih adie — PROJECT 100/38 RECORD th 8 wn, — Sp ——— ———— ——— Sanaa I Jf = S—. = , | l. DATE - TIME GROUP 2. LOCATION =} 09/0130Z Th.26 1 (Multiple) 3. SOURCE |
November 1966 | Saginaw, Minnesota
9 pp
\- =e Ea = 5. i = = er = Tr, — ii __PROJE CT iou7 3 RECORD 2. LOCATION a aR Se woe, a 13, souRCE 110. CONCLUSION | | Civilian Unidentified EEE — EE Se — a —_— = I. | + NUMBER OF OBJEC
November 1966 | Southhampton, New York
6 pp
: ~~ PRUJEC| 1WU/9 RECURU JUVE Su— J —— | Vd A ———— a ————————— econ re . —— teeta I. UATE /TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION 1 9 Nov €6 23302 | Southhampton, 13, SOURCE 10. Civilian | 4. NUMBER
November 1966 | Cisco, Texas
3 pp
\ ‘ OV. . a, SOUR: CE ro: i i. 5 — = . TIME GROUP 66 Civilian a. NUMBER OF OE Ji E c Ts 2. , CONCLUSION | PROJECT 10073 RECCRD Lo SEER CE LOCATION Texas Cisco, Astro(Jupiter)
November 1966 | York, Pennsylvania
4 pp
rm ———— I E—— = Hl " iin si — — —— | — ee —————— “| 2 LocaTioN 3. SOURCE i: | 1. DATE - TIME GROUP 11 10. CONCLUSION ~~ INSUFFICIENT | | Civilian | i. NUMBER OF OBJECT
November 1966 | Dover, New Jersey
15 pp
LOCATION ELS > N 2. 13. SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION | Civilian } 4. NUMBER OF 0BJ ects | BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Ch Few minutes SEE CASE | 1 = = — — l6. TYPE O
November 1966 | York, Pennsylvania
10 pp
i 7. Li EL | ZF i i» "6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION CN m= wl dl a We SUMS ER oF OBJECTS grournic Visual COURSE (TDZ) PROJECT 10073 RE i Ee =~ - . al wg - WE aE = wa -
November 1966 | Orlando, Florida
6 pp
1. DATE . TIME GROUP Ll NOV £o 12/C030% gy cp — 1. NUMBER OF OBJECTS {5% LENGTH OF Op several ninutes EE eee = a = — | 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | Ground Visual gE i ' = Sf
November 1966 | Trotwood, Ohio
16 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD. | 2. LOCATION i : — B11 Nov. 66 | 3. SOURCE 1 | Ohio two witnesses | Sh oe 10. CONCLUSION Civilian Airceraft(possible) 1. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | i one
November 1966 | Cincinnati, Ohio
8 pp
: P ROJE CI Bod ~ WE COR D L 11 Nov 66 12/01h45Z| Cincinnati, Cn. (one witness) Btu | IP. 5 ull EE a Tr —— a, 13. source 10. CONCLUSION | | Civilian | (other) INSU™-ZCTLL. uh JOUR BVALUAT
November 1966 | Indianapolis, Indiana
14 pp
DATE - S1AE'GROUP 13 2. LOcAT ' On | 12 lov 66 13/0130Z | Indianapolis, Indiana 3 winez: uc SOURCE 110. CONCLUSION Corl i ET Le ET Civilizn k | Satelli
November 1966 | Weirton, West Virginia
9 pp
= oo = = a i 'O Fa eye Sr RES Swe WS dn ae wa - N= -COrD = —— a ES _ _ — = = oe a oo El SESE Ss _— SS Se = — —— i wr mc 0 — == i — hl Bs LC 1. DATE + TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION | a on — EE
November 1966 | Washington, D, C
4 pp
Civilian NUM 8 ER OF OBJECTS "LENGTH Oi OF 0BSE RVATION 3 Minutes —_— | 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | “PHOTOS i Yes | 9 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 0 Yes pasw. FTO sepa 0-329 (TDE)
November 1966 | Munster, Indiana
8 pp
Il. DATE : TiME GROUP | aforisz | HOV I ——— C—O — = - sunc E Civilian NUMBCR OF OBJECTS "TYPE OF OBSERVATION FORM “TD sips 0-329 (TDE) BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1954-10-8727179-MojaveDesert-California.pdf
LOCATION Mojave Desert, California
DATE October 1954
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8727179
DECADE 1950s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 2
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 4 + 3 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. PROJECT 10073 RECORD _ 2. LOCATION Mojave Desert, California 10. CONCLUSION CHAFF a [6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION GROUND VISUAL [FOUND ON G ROUND 3. PHOTOS | | { 0 Yes 0 No | 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE | ¥5 Yes NOT RECEIVED FTD sepesz 0-329 (TDE) 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Man 15 mi SW of Edwards found strips ofsilvery colored metal | wialeh could be crumbled in the hand. Most of the objs were about 1/2 long and 1/16th inch wide. Believed them to be new type of radar chaff. COMMENTS + Description indicates chaff. tion supplied in letter. samples not forwarded. Informa- Previous editions of this form may be used,