GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
72
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1950-03-9614532-%5BILLEGIBLE%5D.pdf
LOCATION Location Illegible
DATE March 1950
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 9614532
DECADE 1950s
TYPE Illegible
PAGES 23
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • • • • I • • • • -- 1 • 7u .., • • • • • • ... •• l ' ...: ... •.
================================================================ PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION File: 1950-03-9614532-_ILLEGIBLE_.pdf Transcribed from document image by Claude Sonnet 4.6 Note: Location field [ILLEGIBLE] in filename; identified from supplementary documents as Selma, Alabama. ================================================================ FIELD 1 -- DATE: 30 March 1950 FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: Selma, Alabama [Filename location field flagged ILLEGIBLE by parser; location confirmed from AF teletype and Air Intelligence Report within this file.] FIELD 3 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: Local 1808-1813 CST / GMT [not recorded] FIELD 4 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION: Ground-Visual [X] Ground-Radar [ ] Air-Visual [ ] Air-Intercept Radar [ ] FIELD 5 -- PHOTOS: No (not recorded) FIELD 6 -- SOURCE: Civilian FIELD 7 -- LENGTH OF OBS: 3 min. FIELD 8 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: Three FIELD 9 -- COURSE: 270 degrees FIELD 10 -- BRIEF SUMMARY: Three objects traveled in formation. Were watched for three minutes. Pulled straight up at one time. No contrails or noise. [Color: glowing like sun. Speed: very fast, estimated. Altitude: high, estimated. Size comparison: B-17.] FIELD 11 -- COMMENTS: [Supplementary teletype from CO, 3840th Air Wing, Craig AFB ALA, dated 31/1153Z, provides full detail. Objects first appeared broadside, resembling aircraft, then turned to present edge-on profile to watchers. Middle object pulled straight up; other two followed. Estimated size as large as B-17 bombers at 10,000 feet or higher. Tremendous speed going west. No sound, no exhaust trail. Weather was clear.] FIELD 12 -- CONCLUSIONS: [Partially illegible in scan. Possible notation "a/c" in lower right margin; no UNIDENTIFIED designation visible. Formal conclusion uncertain.] Form: Temporary ATIC Form 329 (2 Jan 52) [Earlier temporary form version predating standard ATIC Form 329 REV 26 SEP 52. REPORT NO. field: AF wire. ATIC NO. and AF NO. blank. DATE IN TO ATIC blank. DATE OF REPORT: 31 March [19]50. DATE OF INFO: 30 March [19]50.] ================================================================ SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS IN THIS FILE ================================================================ This PDF contains an unusually large collection of documents beyond the primary ATIC record card. Each is summarized here; key items are discussed in the analysis below. 1. TELETYPE, FM CO 3840TH AU WING CRAIG AF BASE ALA, R 311153Z (31 March 1950 / 1153 Zulu). TO: JEDC/CG Air Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson, Dayton OH. INFO: JESC/CG Air University, Maxwell AFB ALA; JEPC/Director of Intelligence USAF Washington 25 D.C. Primary field report on the Selma sighting, filed by the commanding officer's office of Craig Air Force Base. Primary civilian witness identified in teletype as MR. TOWNSEND. Signed off: CAFB-OPR-14 HARDY. Full content transcribed in Field 11 above and referenced throughout the analysis. 2. MONTGOMERY ADVERTISER, 31 MARCH and 2 APRIL 1950. Two articles forwarded by the 1922nd AACS Squadron: -- 31 March: "Four observers reported seeing three symmetrical spinning objects maneuver at high speed near Selma, Alabama, late Thursday, 30 March 1950. At first they were thought to be clouds but then the observers noticed that the sun's rays were shining off them as they were metal and that they were travelling at a rapid speed. They all agreed that the middle object disappeared and then returned, then it rose straight up in the air and the others peeled off and followed." -- 2 April: Corroborating report from Mr. and Mrs. [redacted], Prattville, Alabama, who saw three circular objects with bright lights about the rim streaking through the sky near Autaugaville between 5 and 6 PM on 30 March 1950 (approx. the same time as the Selma primary sighting). 3. AF FORM 112 -- AIR INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION REPORT IR-129-50. Prepared by 1st Lt. A. G. Love, USAF, Intelligence Division, HQ MATS (Military Air Transport Service), Andrews AFB, Washington D.C. Dated 18 May 1950. Approved by Lt. Col. W. S. Harris, Chief, Intelligence Division. SUBJECT: Unidentified Flying Objects in USA. Evaluation: C-2. Report covers five alleged sightings by MATS units, all in the US, 29 March through 17 April 1950. The Selma case is Item 2 in the report. 4. HQ THIRD ARMY LETTER, AJACI-3 360.33, 17 March 1950. Fort McPherson, Georgia. To: CG Air Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson, Attn MCI (Control No. A-1917). Subject: Unconventional Aircraft. This letter and its enclosure (Birmingham newspaper clipping, 14 March 1950) concern a SEPARATE Alabama sighting: L. L. Phillips and his wife, riding on Highway 5 between Haleyville and Bear Creek, observed an object come from the west going east, descending at 45 degrees. Described as looking like "a large electric light bulb, white with a streamer behind." It appeared to disintegrate before landing; subsequent search found no trace. Military intelligence notified, no further action taken as of the letter date. Signed: JOHN MEADE, Colonel GSC, AC of S, G-2. [This Phillips/Haleyville sighting is a separate incident from the primary Selma case but was bundled in this file.] 5. "NO CASE (INFORMATION ONLY)" NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS, MARCH 1950. Collection of contemporaneous UFO press coverage filed for ATIC reference. Not active cases. Sources include: -- Keyhoe (1950 P 12): Dr. Craig Hunter, PA; huge elliptical object, metallic, slotted outer rim, rotating inner ring. -- Los Angeles Times, 12 March 1950: Tonantzintla Observatory director Luis Enrique Erro photograph; Mexico City. -- Los Angeles Times, 12 March 1950: Mrs. Ruby Lytle, La Crescenta CA; flying triangle identified by aviation experts as a flying wing at 40,000-50,000 feet. -- News clipping, 13 March 1950: Mexico City and Monterrey; aircraft observers and meteorologists confirmed multiple sightings; objects at 35,000-40,000 feet. -- Washington Times, 28 March 1950: Veteran private pilot Bertram A. Totten; aluminum-colored disk, 40 ft diameter, 10 ft thick; seen while flying at 5000 feet near Washington; vapor trails like aircraft engines. -- New York Times: American seamen, Hong Kong Harbor; three "flying fireballs"; no corroborating witnesses found. -- New York Times, 30 March 1950: Mediterranean and Orient; multiple sightings from Lebanon, Israel, Italy. -- Birmingham Post, 14 March 1950: Mexico City and Durango CO composite (duplicate of content seen elsewhere in file). -- NY World Telegram and Sun, 10 March 1950: Ray L. Dimmick claim of seeing flying saucer wreckage on Mexico City mountainside; unconfirmed by military. -- Los Angeles Times, 17 March 1950: Roy Wolford flying disk kite, possible explanation for some household sightings. -- NY World Telegram, March 1950: Lloyd Locke and Harold Tanner, Durango/Cortez CO, chased by dark flat object about 5 feet diameter between New Mexico and Colorado. -- Los Angeles Times, 12 March 1950: Bette Malles photo of disk-like object, Hawthorne CA. 6. CIVILIAN UFO REPORT FORM (USAF), DATE COMPLETED 11 FEB 1967 (or 2 Nov 1967; ambiguous format). Witness: Mrs. [redacted], 1305 Western Rd., London, Ontario, Canada. Location: between Brescia Hall, University of Western Ontario, and Hethon College, London Ontario. Sighting occurred circa 1952 (witness was 12-13 years old; form filed "15 years later"). Description: pie-plate-shaped object, copper brown, 15-20 feet in diameter, hovering 25-30 feet above her lawn, below pine tree level. Bottom surface visible; metallic, dull brown, joined sections with raised elements "like a huge screw with no cross cut." Soft purring sound. Watched for approximately 3 minutes at close range; ran inside for mother; when they returned, object was departing rapidly, climbing into clouds. Silver in sunlight. Pink and blue streamers visible from the rear when in flight. Mother corroborated the sighting. [This document does not relate to the March 1950 Alabama case and appears to be misfiled or anomalously included in this case packet.] ================================================================ SEARCH INDEX TERMS ================================================================ Selma Alabama 1950 March Craig Air Force Base 3840th Air Wing civilian ground visual formation three objects circular spinning symmetrical illuminated glowing like sun no sound no contrails tremendous speed B-17 size comparison vertical departure 270 degrees west Townsend Montgomery Advertiser Prattville Autaugaville corroborating witness Air Intelligence Information Report IR-129-50 MATS Maxwell AFB Wright-Patterson Haleyville L. L. Phillips streamer disintegrate Alabama flying saucer contemporaneous wave March 1950 Mexico City Mediterranean Bette Malles photo Canadian report London Ontario Western University misfiled 1967 early Blue Book Project Grudge era Craig AFB Alabama aviation formation maneuver edge-on edgewise ================================================================ CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6 ================================================================ NOTE ON DOCUMENT COMPLEXITY This is one of the more document-rich files in the early Blue Book archive. The primary case is the Selma, Alabama formation sighting from the evening of 30 March 1950, reported via Air Force teletype by the commanding officer's office of Craig Air Force Base. Bundled with it are a separate Alabama sighting from earlier in March (the Phillips/Haleyville report), a sweep of contemporaneous newspaper clippings from around the world filed for ATIC reference, a formal Air Intelligence Information Report from MATS covering multiple cases, and what appears to be a misfiled Canadian civilian report from 1967. The analysis below focuses on the primary Selma case and its corroboration, with notes on the other materials where they add context. THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION The conclusion field on the ATIC record card is not clearly legible in the available scan. A notation that may read "a/c" appears in the lower right margin of the card, which in early ATIC practice sometimes indicated "aircraft" as a provisional evaluation. If that is the conclusion, no reasoning is recorded to support it. The Air Intelligence Information Report (IR-129-50) that covers this case carries an evaluation of C-2 -- a rating reflecting a credible source whose information could not be confirmed -- rather than a definitive resolution. No documented explanation for the Selma objects appears anywhere in the file. WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS At approximately 6:08 PM on 30 March 1950, Mr. Townsend and several companions in Selma, Alabama observed three circular, illuminated objects maneuvering in the western sky. The sighting lasted five minutes (1808-1813 CST per the teletype; three minutes per the ATIC card -- the discrepancy is unexplained). The objects were described as glowing, illuminated all over, looking like "little moons or suns." The sequence of observed behavior is specific and unusual. The three objects were initially traveling in formation and appeared broadside to the observers -- at that angle they looked, according to the teletype, like aircraft. They then turned, presenting their edge profile to the watchers. At some point the middle object disappeared, then reappeared. Finally, the middle object pulled straight up and the other two peeled off and followed. The whole episode ended with all three departing to altitude in the western sky at great speed. The witnesses estimated the objects' size at comparable to B-17 bombers, and their altitude at 10,000 feet or higher. No sound was reported. No exhaust trail or contrails were seen. Weather was reported clear. The primary teletype was filed by CAFB-OPR-14 Hardy, an officer in the commanding officer's public relations or operations office at Craig Air Force Base -- the major Air Force installation in Selma itself. The civilian witnesses were therefore reporting their sighting from a community immediately adjacent to a USAF flying training base, to military authorities at that same base. Corroboration was provided by Mr. and Mrs. [redacted] of Prattville, Alabama, approximately 25 miles from Selma. They reported seeing three circular objects with bright lights about the rim streaking through the sky near Autaugaville between 5 and 6 PM the same evening. Their description -- circular, in formation, changing vertical position -- aligns with the primary Selma account. The Montgomery Advertiser ran both accounts. The Air Intelligence Information Report IR-129-50 assigned evaluation C-2 (credible source, unconfirmed information) and included the Selma case as one of five unresolved MATS-area sightings from late March through mid-April 1950. WHAT THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION MISSED OR GOT RIGHT If the evaluation was "aircraft," it is difficult to see how that conclusion fits the reported details. The Craig Air Force Base connection is the most important contextual fact in this case. The primary witnesses were civilians in Selma, a town dominated by a major USAF flight training installation. They would have been more familiar with military aircraft -- including large bombers, trainers, and fighters -- than virtually any civilian population in the country. When these witnesses estimated the objects at "as big as B-17s," they were making that comparison against daily exposure to B-17s and their contemporaries. The observers at the Prattville location, a few miles away, independently described objects of similar appearance and behavior. The behavior pattern is particularly hard to square with conventional aircraft of 1950. The sequence of broadside presentation, edge-on rotation, middle object disappearance and reappearance, and simultaneous coordinated vertical departure describes something with either remarkable precision of coordinated flight or a single object structure behaving in an unusual way. B-17-class aircraft cannot perform a coordinated vertical departure at "tremendous speed." The aircraft of 1950 that could perform such maneuvers were experimental jet interceptors, none of which were known to operate in formation of three over Selma, Alabama at dusk. The absence of sound is telling for the estimated altitude. At 10,000 feet or lower -- within the range where conventional aircraft noise would have been audible on a clear evening -- the witnesses reported silence. No contrails at that altitude on a clear day is also notable, though not conclusive, as contrail formation depends on humidity and temperature. The corroboration from Prattville strengthens the case without resolving it. Two separate groups, approximately 25 miles apart, describing similar objects at similar times, provides the kind of geographic separation that helps rule out shared perceptual error. What is missing from the file is any follow-up investigation. Craig Air Force Base had active radar capability. Whether radar at Craig or at Maxwell AFB (also in Alabama, about 90 miles away) tracked anything on the evening of 30 March 1950 is a question the file never asks. The MATS Air Intelligence report notes the sighting and assigns a C-2 rating but makes no investigative recommendation. WHAT MAKES THIS CASE NOTABLE 1. The Craig AFB setting makes this a particularly credible civilian report. Selma, Alabama in 1950 was a military aviation town. The witnesses reporting unfamiliar aerial objects were people accustomed to seeing military aircraft overhead every day. That the commanding officer's office at Craig filed the teletype rather than dismissing the report signals that the witnesses were taken seriously locally. 2. The coordinated formation behavior -- broadside to edge-on rotation, middle object departure and return, simultaneous vertical departure -- is a more specific and structured sequence than most civilian UFO reports of this era, which tend toward simpler descriptions of lights or shapes. 3. Independent corroboration from Prattville 25 miles away on the same evening, with a consistent description, adds meaningful weight. 4. The March 1950 wave context: The "NO CASE -- INFORMATION ONLY" clippings bundled with this file reflect that late March 1950 was an unusually active period for UFO reports globally -- Mexico City (confirmed by trained observers and meteorologists using balloon tracking instruments), the Mediterranean basin, the Near East, the northeastern US. The Selma case sits within this larger pattern. Whether that is meaningful or reflects media amplification is an open question. 5. The misfiled Canadian report deserves brief mention as an archival curiosity. A 1967 civilian form describing a 1952 close-approach sighting in London, Ontario -- a pie-plate object hovering 25-30 feet above a twelve-year-old girl on her lawn, with a soft purring sound, copper-brown metallic texture, and pink-blue streamers on departure -- has nothing to do with the Selma Alabama case. Its presence here is unexplained, possibly a filing error from the period when these records were being organized prior to declassification. Taken on its own, the Canadian report is a striking account, but it belongs to a different case. BOTTOM LINE The Selma, Alabama sighting of 30 March 1950 is a credible, corroborated, and uninvestigated formation observation made by civilians in close proximity to an active Air Force base, filed through official military channels within 24 hours of the event. Whatever the "a/c" notation represents, it does not appear to reflect any documented investigation that actually accounted for the reported behavior. The Middle object disappearing and reappearing, the edge-on rotation, and the coordinated vertical departure at speed over a community that saw military aircraft daily -- these details make a routine misidentification harder to sustain as an explanation. The absence of radar follow-up from a base that was right there is the single largest gap in the record. This is not the most dramatic case in the Blue Book archive. It did not generate the press coverage of some contemporaneous sightings, and the official record is thin. But it is the kind of case that rewards attention precisely because of what surrounds it: credible observers, a military context, geographic corroboration, and a complete absence of serious investigation. ================================================================ END OF DOCUMENT ================================================================ GlitchyMatrix.com/bluebook/ -- Project Blue Book Archive