GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
September 1950 | 5 Mi, SW Effingham, Illinois
4 pp
September 1950 | Nashville, Tennessee
Other 3 pp
September 1950 | Tatuill, Nm
9 pp
--- ~~·-.,~- - ·~--- - = - ~ ~-
September 1950 | Tinker AFB, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
MILITARY 3 pp
• •
September 1950 | Roswell, Nm
Aircraft 15 pp
• •
September 1950 | Poplarbluff, Missouri
6 pp
September 1950 | Kit Carson, Colorado
2 pp
September 1950 | Denver, Colorado
Astro (Meteor) Military 8 pp
- •
September 1950 | Provincetown, Massachusetts
UNIDENTIFIED 15 pp
• •
September 1950 | Mt, Palomar, California
3 pp
• , , •
September 1950 | Birmingham, Ala
3 pp
• •
September 1950 | Sandia Base, Nm
7 pp
• • • •
October 1950 | Gennessee Mt, Colorado | Incident #826
INCIDENT #826 3 pp
• File 826 October 28, 1950 A I
October 1950 | Location Illegible
16 pp
- ~ ~ _,,,_ - - - - - ------------ = -_ ~ -
October 1950 | Kauai, Hawaii
2 pp
• • • •
October 1950 | New Orleans, Louisiana
12 pp
• •
October 1950 | Lark, Utah
7 pp
• • • • •
October 1950 | March AFB, California
MILITARY 7 pp
• • • •
October 1950 | Pope AFB, North Carolina
MILITARY 6 pp
• • •
October 1950 | Warrenton, Nc
Astro (Star/Planet) 1 pp
• .. •
October 1950 | New Haven, Connecticut
2 pp
ftROJECT 10073 RECORD • . -.----~--~------~~~~~~~------------------~ ~ • .,.,..; • TIMI OIIOUP 2. LOC''TIOH
October 1950 | Lat 78 Deg 30 Long 21 Deg 6, Cuba
2 pp
• • • • • • I
October 1950 | Knoxville, Tennessee, Oak Ridge
Other 40 pp
• • •
October 1950 | Nof Rome, Ny
11 pp
• i •
November 1950 | San Francisco, California
7 pp
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1949-06-6314379-Huntsville-Ohio-381-.pdf
LOCATION Huntsville, Ohio
DATE June 1949
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 6314379
DECADE 1940s
TYPE Sighting
INCIDENT #381
PAGES 13
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • - "' • • I • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD : 1. DAlE • T iit~.: GROUP 2. . ~ATION • • ~ Ju."le 49 ll/2220Z 11 Huntsville, Ohio \k:-..----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------~ sou~ce 10. CONCLUSION i~ Civilicm AIRCRAFt • • ·~ 4. NU;.;BER OF OBJECTS I ~ No data presented to indicate object could Nor have been an A/C. P One ., ·~ 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS , Ydnute~ • • j