GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
May 1966 | Wichita, Kansas
14 pp
'. • •
May 1966 | Wappingers Falls, New York
Multiple 7 pp
• • • _____ _______________ ____________ ---,.,
May 1966 | Chicago, Illinois
8 pp
• • •
May 1966 | Vermillion, South Dakota
3 pp
.. •
May 1966 | Roslyn Heights, New York
11 pp
•
May 1966 | Huber Hts, Ohio
8 pp
• •
May 1966 | Kettering, Ohio
8 pp
' • •
May 1966 | Linton, Ohio
9 pp
., • •
May 1966 | Jefferson, Ohio
8 pp
• • • •
May 1966 | Cheyenne, Wyoming
3 pp
. • -
May 1966 | Fort Carson, Colorado
13 pp
May 1966 | Atlanta, Georgia
10 pp
.. • • •
June 1966 | Hamburg, New York | Incident #10683
Aircraft INCIDENT #10683 5 pp
Fi lr> 106~3 June 23 , 1 q(J( Hamt•lrg , txew York 1 photo
June 1966 | Waikiki Beach, Hawaii | Incident #10696
Other (Unreliable Report) INCIDENT #10696 Civilian 3 pp
File 10( c.,(, June 29 , 1966 Waikiki E~ach , Ha.wnii. 1 photo
June 1966 | Ligao, Philippines | Incident #10700
INCIDENT #10700 9 pp
Filf' 10700 Lira~, Philippine~ ( nep:ativf>r. 1 photo
June 1966 | Columbus, Ohio
Other 81 pp
• .. • . ..• .
June 1966 | Easton, Penna
Other 4 pp
• • •
June 1966 | Hartford, Wisconsin
16 pp
-
June 1966 | Dayton, Ohio
Insufficient Data Multiple 59 pp
, .
June 1966 | Colorado Springs, Colorado
24 pp
•• • •
June 1966 | Claremont, California
5 pp
• ''
June 1966 | Houston, Texas
Aircraft 22 pp
• • •
June 1966 | Lycoming, New York
5 pp
• .. .. •
June 1966 | Huntington, New York
4 pp
.. •• •
June 1966 | Northport, New York
11 pp
• .' • •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1966-10-8287330-Rossburg-Ohio.pdf
LOCATION Rossburg, Ohio
DATE October 1966
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8287330
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 8
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • .- . PROJECT 10073 RECORD ,.. 2. LOCATI ON • ------~----------------~----------------------------------------------------------···~·~---- • ~ .k Go .. i • .. -) Rossburg, Chio two witnesse:s 10. CONCLUSION • i t.f c '2. .. Insufficient d~L• for evaluation ~ •