OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.|
“. Tad +ad
1 ie. wer OF OBJECTS
i “i
f 4
1 % LENGTH OF OBSERVATION
i
io. y+
- 23 hots % J
| 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION
i
uround ¥isual
— than
“RuJocw
us. ot rn CLuRy
' 2. LOCATION
Cit J's i aeh .1zxan
— LE By =. = [la
ra La BU3IE
116. CONCLUSION
rrchable astro:
4 te S— S— — , ini tts 2}
11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
Ihe observer sighted a blue, green,
a star and was similar to a
| the Sw .
red objectv tha was lars.
saucer wita a .arge hump i
‘he object was viewed for lp hours, in rouzlhly |
pi | |
-
| 7. COURSE
[ nearly at ~ationary
| 8. PHOTOS
00 Yes
~~ &@ Ne
'9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
0 Yas
Ne
eG - ia
FTO scp é3 0-329 \TDE)
CC..niTS: There were no mnown aircraft or balloons in the
vicinity and nc unusual weather. Lothingzg unusual was paictes
by aeard: radars. The miliaty observer 20 miles appox. wz.w
of ooserver said he saw the object in the north while obLse. -.
said S+, The investigating officer thought it could heve tro.
| astronomicakX. ‘here are many bright stars it may have been: |!
Capella, Procyon, Castor Betolgeuse or even Jupiten. |
|
om