GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
September 1965 | Michigan
5 pp
EE WE iE S—— ssa a _ i — m—— — = EE TEER el mT DEER ET PROJECT 10073 RECO l. DATE - TIME GROUP 13. S“GURCE i Wow @ a s jy = — 1. NUMBER OF OBJECTS Fhzte P
September 1965 | Bakersfield, California
9 pp
ill DATE 1 September 65 02/05% PROJECT 10073 RECORD | 2. LOCATION | Z Bakersfield, California —_ ee — Tm a — —% 3 SOURCE { Civilian a 10.
September 1965 | Nebraska Missile Site
7 pp
|1. DATE - TIME GROUP 3. wMIRCE _ralacapy | 1. NUMBER OF OBJECTS |5 LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 1 Hour, Hine Mim es ¢. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | 2. =. 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS LOCATION 10073
September 1965 | Laredo, Texas
32 pp
= == =. —— EE - 1 ET ee Si — PROJECT 10073 Ri 1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION | ee | 2 September 65 03/01442 Foal Mex 3. wMIRCE Civilian = m= | 11. HIUIMBER OF OBJECTS
September 1965 | Dayton, Ohio
100 pp
7 10, CONCLUSION 5 ATEL LITE . | Wavering flight probably distorted due to atmospheric conditions 41 111usion and imagination of witness. All other data character- istic of a satellite report.
September 1965 | Biloxi, Mississippi
3 pp
IF Rp 5 = - == . — = EE a = fo —— = EE ie te Em EEE bo — | PROJECT 10073 RECORD. 13 i Fe i | —— | = One “will R ci Eo Civi lian 017) Vv NUMBE R OF OBJECTS LEN
September 1965 | Clearmont, Iowa
4 pp
Lee —— —— a PROJECT 10073 RECORD Ls DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION 2 September 65 Ens Clearmont,, 1omn ~ |10. concLusion ia = 1 “st J i RC E Civilian Satellite (ECHO IT) W I — ——
September 1965 | Exeter, New Hampshire
131 pp
—— F—— rr Sp P= = — Em me = — = = ——_ aE _ == — = 3 === — Emma mm = — —_ = — co DATE a —— a . TIME GROUP 2 = 2 September 1905 [3. SOURCE | Civilians (MULTIPIE) 11. NUMBER
September 1965 | Portland, Indiana
8 pp
PROJECT 10073 REC JRD [1 oATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION. NE 3 Sen 65__03/05307 Portland, Indiom RISER 10. CONCLUSION ASTRO (STAR/PLAMETY = civilian | Positional data indicates that
September 1965 | Moraine, Ohio
8 pp
PROJECT 10073 R ECO D DATE - TIME GROUP =~ 2. "LOCATION | 3 Septe ember 65 03/ O7hpZ Moraine, Chic ONCLUSION 3 ~OURCE {10. C Civilian | Astr
September 1965 | Columbus, Ohio
2 pp
1 | I _ 4 | ‘ a "“IRCE Civilian (Assumed) : NUMBER OF OBJECTS 2 Minutes TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground-Visual (Assum 1 “7 = B x) lL No i 10. | = COURSE
September 1965 | Waynesville, Ohio
10 pp
sd mabe ~ PROJECT 10073 RECORD 1. DATE - TIME GROUP "| 2. LOCATION mt 3 Sertewrher 65 Ol / 03L32Z Waynesvi lle, (hin Ee mes we EE — — — —= — [
September 1965 | Tampa, Florida
2 pp
13 “«WMNIRCE {. NUMBER OF OBJECTS Three (One Fach) . LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 10 Mim es |«. 1YPE OF OBSERVATION 10. concLusioN La —— | 4 September 65 05/0127 - PROJECT 10073 RE
September 1965 | Ozone Park, New York
5 pp
Tt Tr me p= El = — == a — r _ -— 1 - = — I _ —— pe — . =e = me i ———— — Te i P———W 0 = eo Ee { CC — — 1. DATE - TIME 4 September 65 05/013¢z Eh 3 SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION
September 1965 | Cleveland, Ohio
19 pp
i E—— i I. DATE - TIME GROUP 65 __05/0300Z 13. sounce | Civilian rr —— —— — om PROJECT 10072 RECORL Cleveland, Ohic 110. CONCLUSION A/C (WITH ADVERTISING LIGHT)
September 1965 | Conway, N, H
3 pp
PROJECT "M71 RE CORE 1. DATE - TIME GROUP L. September 65 05/0330Z Conway, N. H. 3. SOURCE [10. CONCLUSION Civilian | 1. MIIMBER OF OBJECTS | Three 1
October 1965 | Baker, Oregon | Incident #10030
INCIDENT #10030 7 pp
i
October 1965 | St, George, Minnesota | Incident #10033
INCIDENT #10033 2 pp
October 1965 | Cloverdale, Ohio
3 pp
jo mer rey DATE - TIME GROUP 27 Qetohar 85. 2 ls SOURCE | Civilian | 4. NUMBER OF 08JECTS | One Si - —— 5, LENGTH OF 035 SERVATION |S Not &. TYPE OF reported OBSERVATION -V
October 1965 | Rolling Meadows, Illinois
21 pp
| 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION at least 30 saconds Ground-Visual 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION 7. COURSE {8. PHOTOS 4 il Yes { XI No 1 Yes FTD sep 63 | — No
October 1965 | Bayshore, New York
3 pp
a aa a saa = - = CL EE TTT TE a 1 Fv A i PROJECT 10073 RECORD _ | { 1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. "LOCATION 01207 TT a egg | Bayshore, Naw OEE RR ae 10. CONCLUSION | afc _Cne 5. LENGTH OF
October 1965 | West Milton, Ohio
4 pp
{iW fl ET {3. SOURCE 1 | Civilian 1. NUMBER OF OBJECTS me Erebye ITE wy The Jie mA PTET = L DATE TIME GROUP Catober 65 [5 LenaTn o caseAvaTIon | 5 Minutes {s. TY
October 1965 | Florissant, Missouri
11 pp
— oo — — —— TES S— . __ ap Wop Wy rer RE ___ PROJECT 10073 RECORD DATE - TIME GROUP 29 Cot ovar 55 _30/08L,52 i: eo ind |3. “CURCE 10. CONCLUSION | \
October 1965 | Rome, New York
6 pp
{1. DATE - TIME GROUP |... 30 October Js iE waglJE CC i _Oivilian oa | 1. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | | gh ROJE £ CT 10073 RECORD |S. LENGTH OF O3SERVATION |11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALY
October 1965 | Overton, Nevada
6 pp
— So = EE TT me — - == ww a E =a = = — TH Sen EE TE hs i ™ - = Ei E i DATE - TIME GRC | 2. LOCATION RRP LT ese . i gt® EY - = § ii i 3 | 13. LOURCE 10. CONCLUS
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1955-10-7339776-Fairfield-California.pdf
LOCATION Fairfield, California
DATE October 1955
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 7339776
DECADE 1950s
TYPE Sighting
OBSERVER Civilian
PAGES 2
STATUS CASE MISSING
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 7 + 3 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD | 1. DATE : TEN: LOGATIONST Ln OL 2 comcrusioes | | Was Balloon Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon 29 Oct 55 : Pairfield, California I 1. DATE-TIME GROUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Was Aircraft Probably Aircraft Possibly Aircraft | Lacal : : Ge Ground- Vi sual 0 Ground-Radar | GMT. 29/23502_ 0 Air-Visual = _ o Adr- Intercept R Radar | 5. PHOTOS TARE 6 SOURCE” Sm i a 0 0 0 O Was Astronomical | i. BE | 0 Yes I Yes 0 u xX O Probably Astronomical a Me ay a Possibly Astronomical | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE | Other lasofficiant Data for Evaluatio n Unknown ho. ‘BRI EF "SUMMARY OF SIGHTING oa COMMENTS | : | One (possibly two objs in close prox saty) Due to delay and discrepancies in the | the size of the head of a pin when ?irst observers storeds, nc signted and then the size of a No 4 2B vhen authorized. INSUFFICIENT DATA. 3] are la 2 === — — = = ATIC FORM 329 (REV 15 SEP 52) 1