GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
72
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1965-03-8724286-Corvallis-Oregon.pdf
LOCATION Corvallis, Oregon
DATE March 1965
EVALUATION UNIDENTIFIED
CASE NO 8724286
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 11
STATUS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.1. DATE - L larch 65 05/023 3. SOURCE Civilian NUMBER OF OBJECTS FN ww a 4. ® fl ml 5 LENGTH OF OBSERVATION LOrvi 10. CONCLUSION UNID=RITIFI DD averazl Tacos ikree 1ints simil op — Pare ceyn 13m A pp 5. TYPE OF OBSERVATION i Rel a” oh el dl'ed I10W0 TOTTI, Ground-7isual Atted for analysis. flight was aliost st 7. COURSE Flight 2 : 3 or a m- yt c— | 8 PHOTOS 3 .4 LE Gs aa MNo : ; - i dl 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - INN 7 0 Ya oy keds? oc Ee FORM FTD sep s3 0-329 (TDE) Previous sditdons of this form may be used, = i... dled 9 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Orezon TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION — ssa rallow=oras se isi hy Cal wae — = = 3 a = a w 0 Fa a: i, CTY : nd oh = fr - = ail a de - a al Tw . x eos - Pa a3 TV SI . i = ol A : or i fa —. 1 a n ull L [RT — = mf wt J Co w = bg, ws = —hs J or — " -— a - “we "5 APE * xe - 3 +0 wal: 5 or “1 rode Bg rg 1X1 al le Med. a Fe = | Pe - ye i] ph, ; _— DL aight up to altitude of about 200 ft. == A - | Prag. - 2 med ; . ce : mM. Lacident occured wilkh= - i - & PA , “i " - - § = = w= B a hy wv oJ a i » mim . = = i - ww ie Ld ala - 3 a4 - ol; i Ee — ——— i — i —.
---------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================ PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION File: 1965-03-8724286-Corvallis-Oregon.pdf Transcribed from document image by Claude Sonnet 4.6 ================================================================ Note: This case file uses FTD Form 0-329 (TDE, Sep 63 revision), a later version of the standard ATIC Form 329 (REV 26 SEP 52). Field numbering and layout differ from the earlier form. Fields are transcribed as they appear on the FTD version. The file includes six supplemental documents beyond the record card, all transcribed below. FIELD 1 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: 4 March 65 05/0230Z FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: Corvallis, Oregon FIELD 3 -- SOURCE: Civilian FIELD 4 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: Three FIELD 5 -- LENGTH OF OBS: Several Seconds FIELD 6 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION: Ground-Visual [X] Ground-Radar [ ] Air-Visual [ ] Air-Intercept Radar [ ] FIELD 7 -- COURSE: Rising FIELD 8 -- PHOTOS: No FIELD 9 -- PHYSICAL EVIDENCE: Yes [X] FIELD 10 -- CONCLUSION: UNIDENTIFIED [X] FIELD 11 -- BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS: Three lights similar to roman candles, yellow-orange rising from ground several seconds apart. Observed from car. Went to area next morning and found oily spot. Dirt with oil submitted for analysis. No tracks or markings in the area. Flight was almost straight up to altitude of about 200 ft. Witness [farmer] on farm. Incident occurred within 10 miles of [Adair] AFB. No additional reports of the nature. [COMMENTS field -- lower portion partially illegible due to scan quality; full text rendered in supplemental typewritten narrative transcribed in Document 1 below:] Physical evidence analysis of dirt indicated that only [illegible] was present and no additional chemicals such as nitrates or [illegible]. Nothing similar... no evidence to indicate that anyone was shooting flares [or fireworks] and the area under observation. Case carried as UNIDENTIFIED. Form: FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) [Note: Two prints of the record card present -- primary (legible) and secondary (severely degraded, no additional readable data)] ================================================================ SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS -- TRANSCRIPTION ================================================================ -- DOCUMENT 1: Typewritten investigative summary -- Heading: CORVALLIS, OREGON / 4 MARCH 1965 Two observers, a driver and a passenger, in an automobile, were driving slowly on Toria Road, southeast of Corvallis, Oregon, when they sighted three lights, similar to roman candles, rising from the ground, several seconds apart. The lights appeared as yellow balls, about the size of a tennis ball and emitting light. The flight path was almost straight up to an altitude of about 200 feet where it disappeared. Observer stated that on the next day he went back to the area where the object was spotted and there was a dark spot on the ground. There were no other visible tracks or markings to the observer. The observer obtained a dirt sample from the darker area in his field. COMMENTS Although the sighting is similar to a fireworks display, no evidence was uncovered that anyone was shooting flares or fireworks. Meteorological personnel and personnel of the Portland Air Defense Sector have revealed no correlation of this sighting with known air activity or natural phenomena. An analysis of the dirt indicated it contained a petroleum hydrocarbon base oil and no additional chemicals, such as nitrates or sulfer [sic]. Considering the information available, there is no explanation for the alleged sighting and the case is carried as unidentified. -- DOCUMENT 2: Incoming military message, 4 pages -- AF IN: 36564 (9 Mar 65) UNCLASSIFIED FROM: POADS ADAIR AFS ORE (Msg POODC-I 00942 MAR 65) TO: RUWGALE/ADC RUWHBH/25TH AIR DIV MCCHORD AFB WASHINGTON RUCDSQ/AIR TECH INTEL CENTER WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB OHIO RUEAHQ/HQ USAF RUEAHQ/SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC PART A -- DESCRIPTION OF OBJECT: 1. Round light similar to roman candle. 2. Tennis ball. 3. Yellowish orange. 4. Three. 5. Rose from ground several seconds apart. 6. Yellow ball, size of tennis ball, emitting light. 7. Tennis ball with roman candle-like light. 8. Sound: None. 9. Observer states that the next day he saw one dark spot on his silt-covered field, and that the spot looked like oil. No other tracks or markings. He has soil sample with what appears to be oil. PART B -- DESCRIPTION OF COURSE: 1. The light in unusual area associated with this sighting drew the attention of the observer. 2. Almost straight up. 3. Disappeared at about 200 ft altitude. 4. Almost straight up, very fast. 5. As if something came between observer and observed light. 6. Several seconds. PART C -- MANNER OF OBSERVATION: 1. Visual. Observer was in private car, driving slowly on road. 2. No optical aids used. 3. Not applicable. PART D -- TIME AND DATE: 1. 050230Z MAR 1965. 2. Dusk. PART E -- LOCATION: Toria Road, southeast city of Corvallis, Oregon, Benton County, on observer's farm. PART F -- IDENTIFYING INFORMATION: Mr. [REDACTED], age 60, [REDACTED] Road, Corvallis, Oregon. Farmer. Reliability cannot be judged. Mr. [REDACTED] also observed the phenomena; he was a passenger in same car as Mr. [REDACTED]. Mr. [REDACTED] is 40 plus years old, lives at [REDACTED] Corvallis, Oregon. He is a farmhand employed by Mr. [REDACTED]. Reliability cannot be judged. PART G -- WEATHER: 1. Clear weather -- twilight. 2. Wind direction and velocity: Surface: Calm / Calm 5,000: 200 deg / 13 knots 10,000: 160 deg / 11 knots 16,000: 120 deg / 28 knots 20,000: 120 deg / 31 knots 30,000: 130 deg / 21 knots 50,000: 220 deg / 21 knots 80,000: 240 deg / 09 knots 3. Ceiling unlimited. 4. Visibility 30 miles. 5. Amount of cloud cover: 0. 6. No thunderstorms in area. 7. Normal temperature gradient. PART H: No unusual conditions which might account for sighting. PART I: None. PART J: None which might account for sighting. PART K -- INVESTIGATIVE COMMENTS: (Major Arthur F. Shiflett, Staff Intelligence Officer, Portland Air Defense Sector) The UFO sighting contained in this report is alleged to have occurred within ten miles of Adair AFS at a point near the Corvallis Municipal Airport. Efforts coordinated with airport personnel, meteorological personnel and personnel of the Portland Air Defense Sector have revealed no correlation of this sighting with known air activity or natural phenomena. Although a passenger in Mr. Harrison's automobile verified his sighting, this headquarters has received no other report of the incident. The reliability of this sighting cannot be verified. Mr. [REDACTED] was advised to retain soil samples in the event samples are required for formal investigation. PART L: Mr. [REDACTED] has soil sample from dark spot observed following day on his field. BT NOTE: Adv cy delivered to NIN and DIA. [Note: The primary observer's surname "Harrison" appears unredacted in Part K above. All other personal name references in the document are redacted.] -- DOCUMENT 3: Joint Messageform, FTD to POADS -- FROM: FTD, WP AFB, OHIO TO: POADS ADAIR AFS ORE UNCLAS/TDEW(UFO) 13495 MAR 65 / Dated 9 March 1965 For Major Arthur F. Shiflett. Reference your UNCLAS POODC-I 00942 MAR 65. Request soil sample be obtained and forwarded to FTD (TDEW/UFO), Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433. No other information required at this time. Initiated by: Hector Quintanilla Jr., TDEW(UFO), Ext 69216 Signed: Eric T. de Jonckheere, Colonel, USAF Deputy for Technology and Subsystems -- DOCUMENT 4: Certified mail mailing record -- From: POADS, Adair AFS, Corvallis Ore 97333 Certified Mail No. 073268 Label text: SOIL SAMPLE FROM FARM OF MR. [REDACTED], AS REQUESTED IN FTD MSG 13495 MAR 65. ORIG REPORT CONTAINED IN POADS MSG UNCLAS POODC-I 00942 MAR 65. -- DOCUMENT 5: SUBORDER form (ASD Form 49 DEC 61) -- Task No.: G-68002 [approximately; handwritten] Description of work (handwritten): DETERMINE ORGANIC CHEMICAL COMPONENTS PRESENT IN DIRT. IT IS SUSPECTED TO BE AN OIL. Initiated by: Sgt. Moody, FTD, Ext. 69216 Project Engineer/Planner: A.T. McDenitt, MAYA, Ext. 21/14 Date completed: 14 April 65 Man-hours expended: 6 Closing action signed by: Hector [Quintanilla] Jr., Capt. USAF [illegible title] -- DOCUMENT 6: Laboratory evaluation report -- AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS DIVISION AIR FORCE MATERIALS LABORATORY, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY DIVISION, WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO MATERIALS PHYSICS DIVISION / AF MATERIALS LABORATORY EVALUATION REPORT: Analysis of Earth Sample Report NR: MAY 65-13 Date: 14 April 1965 Submitted by: FTD (Sgt. Moody) Analytical Branch Number: #5-628 I. PURPOSE To analyze the sample for organic components that would be foreign to the sample. II. FACTUAL DATA A sample of dirt was submitted to the Analytical Branch and assigned Analytical Branch number #5-628. Approximately half the sample (105 grams) was extracted with carbon tetrachloride. The solvent was evaporated and an infrared spectrum obtained of the residue. The spectrum showed the residue to be a petroleum hydrocarbon base oil. About 10 c.c. of residue was extracted from the sample showing the dirt contained an appreciable amount of oil. III. CONCLUSION The dirt sample was analyzed and found to contain a petroleum hydrocarbon base oil. Prepared by: W.J. Crawford, MAYA Approved by: Doctor S. Morrisey, Capt., USAF Asst. Chief, Analytical Branch Materials Physics Division, AF Materials Laboratory Distribution: FTD (Sgt. Moody), MAY, MAYA (5 copies), MAAM (Library) [Note: Publication review stamp reads "This report has been reviewed and is approved." Form: ASD Form 64, Jun 61] ================================================================ SEARCH INDEX TERMS ================================================================ Corvallis Oregon Benton County Toria Road 1965 March civilian farmer farmhand automobile twilight dusk roman candle yellow orange ball lights rising ground UNIDENTIFIED physical evidence soil sample dirt oil petroleum hydrocarbon Adair AFS radar Portland Air Defense Sector Wright-Patterson AF Materials Laboratory chemical analysis ground-visual silent sequential 200 feet disappear carbon tetrachloride infrared spectrum Hector Quintanilla FTD Blue Book agricultural farm silt-covered field dark spot no tracks no markings Corvallis Municipal Airport Willamette Valley Benton County Oregon 1960s Harrison Major Shiflett Dr. Morrisey W.J. Crawford Sgt. Moody ball lightning roman candle fireworks flares methane gas seep petroleum geology ================================================================ CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6 ================================================================ THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION The USAF classified this case UNIDENTIFIED after an investigation that went considerably further than most Blue Book cases. The reporting officer, Major Arthur F. Shiflett of the Portland Air Defense Sector, coordinated with airport personnel, meteorological staff, and air defense personnel. The case was distributed to ADC, the 25th Air Division at McChord, Air Technical Intelligence at Wright-Patterson, HQ USAF, and the Secretary of the Air Force. Hector Quintanilla -- then directing Blue Book at FTD -- personally requested the soil sample and directed its laboratory analysis. The UNIDENTIFIED classification here is the product of genuine investigative effort, not bureaucratic indifference. WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS Two civilian witnesses -- a 60-year-old farmer (whose surname Harrison appears unredacted in the military message's Part K) and his 40-plus-year-old farmhand -- were driving slowly on Toria Road, southeast of Corvallis, on the evening of 4 March 1965. Conditions were optimal: unlimited ceiling, 30-mile visibility, zero cloud cover, surface winds calm. The time was approximately 6:30 PM Pacific Standard Time (0230Z on the 5th), which the file confirms as dusk. They observed three lights rising sequentially from the ground, each several seconds after the last. The lights were yellowish orange, round, roughly the size of a tennis ball, emitting light in the manner of a roman candle. Flight path was nearly vertical, described as "very fast," and each light disappeared at approximately 200 feet altitude. A detail from the military message not on the summary card: the disappearance was described as "as if something came between observer and observed light" -- language suggesting the lights extinguished or were occluded rather than departing laterally or ascending out of sight. No sound was noted. The following morning, Harrison returned to his silt-covered field and found a single dark spot on the ground. No tracks or other markings were present. He collected a soil sample from the dark area -- an action showing both presence of mind and genuine concern that something had happened on his land. That sample traveled from observer to Adair AFS to Wright- Patterson via certified mail. The AF Materials Laboratory (Analytical Branch, MAYA) received a 105-gram portion, extracted it with carbon tetrachloride, and ran an infrared spectrum on the residue. The residue was identified as petroleum hydrocarbon base oil. Roughly 10 cubic centimeters of oil residue were recovered -- described as "an appreciable amount." Importantly, the analysis found no nitrates and no sulfur. The investigators were specifically testing for pyrotechnic and explosive residue chemistry, and found none. WHAT GIVES ME PAUSE The oil is the crux of this case, and it cuts two ways. It is real physical evidence, professionally analyzed by a USAF laboratory at the specific request of the Blue Book director. That is not nothing. But petroleum oil in farm soil has abundant mundane explanations: machinery leaks, fuel spillage, prior agricultural activity. The critical question the investigators did not clearly answer is whether the dark spot was new. The military message records that Harrison "went back to the area where the object was spotted" and found it -- language that implies discovery, not recognition of something familiar. But the file does not include an explicit prior-knowledge statement from Harrison, and without that, the connection between the oil and the lights remains assumed rather than demonstrated. An explanatory framework the file does not explore: natural petroleum seep and associated hydrocarbon gas venting. If the soil was already petroleum-bearing -- as the lab confirmed -- the related question is whether the same formation might vent methane or other combustible gases. Sequential ignitions of rising gas pockets from a petroleum substrate could theoretically produce flame balls that ascend and extinguish when the fuel disperses below flammability concentration. This mechanism is at least consistent with several unusual features simultaneously: the confirmed oil in the soil, the sequential timing (suggesting separate events rather than a single source), the near-vertical rise, and the extinguishing at a fixed altitude. Oregon's Willamette Valley includes Eocene sedimentary formations with documented hydrocarbon presence. The Corvallis area is not known for active gas seeps, but the investigators checked for fireworks chemistry and not for petroleum geology. This remains speculative -- I am not claiming it is the explanation. I am noting that the one chemical finding in the case could point toward an unexplored natural mechanism. The sequential timing deserves its own consideration. Three distinct lights, each appearing several seconds after the previous one, is not characteristic of ball lightning, which does not appear in precisely spaced sequences. It is also difficult to reconcile with conventional fireworks launched by an unseen party: three separate soundless discharges, precisely timed, leaving no pyrotechnic residue, with no launcher visible and no reports from any other observer in the area. The surface wind was calm, ruling out rapid drift of any lighter-than-air objects. The observers themselves: "reliability cannot be judged" is standard military hedging when rapid background verification was unavailable. It should not be read as active skepticism. A 60-year-old farmer on his own land and his 40-year-old employee, driving slowly in excellent visibility conditions, are not inherently suspect witnesses. The farmhand's presence is worth noting -- two independent observers seeing the same thing from the same vehicle is meaningful corroboration even if it does not satisfy the military's standard for multiple independent reports. The location is also worth marking. Toria Road, southeast Corvallis, Benton County, on Mr. Harrison's farm -- within ten miles of Adair AFS, a USAF radar installation, and near the Corvallis Municipal Airport. The military's swift and multi-level response is partly explained by this geography. Airport, meteorological, and air defense personnel all checked for correlation and found none. BOTTOM LINE This case earns its UNIDENTIFIED classification. The investigation was conducted at multiple levels, involved professional chemical analysis of collected physical evidence, and closed without an explanation. The oil finding is confirmed and real. The sequential, vertical, silent, soundless lights -- observed by two witnesses in clear conditions at dusk -- do not fit any conventional explanation that the investigation's own thorough process could surface. The methane or natural gas seep hypothesis is the most coherent mundane framework I can construct that accounts simultaneously for the confirmed petroleum in the soil, the sequential rise, the vertical trajectory, and the extinguishing at altitude. But it was not explored, and it remains speculative. What the record gives us: two witnesses who saw something real on a farm in Benton County, a genuine dark spot in a field the next morning, and petroleum hydrocarbon oil confirmed in the soil by a USAF laboratory at Wright-Patterson. The lights themselves have no explanation on record. This is one of the more evidentiary UNIDENTIFIED cases in the archive -- modest in scale but notable for the chain of custody that ran from a farmer's field all the way to a spectral infrared analysis signed off by a USAF captain and distributed to the Blue Book director. Whatever Mr. Harrison and his farmhand saw on Toria Road, the Air Force took it seriously enough to find out what was in the ground. ================================================================ END OF DOCUMENT ================================================================ GlitchyMatrix.com/bluebook/ ----------------------------------------------------------------