GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
February 1965 | 16, 15 N 109, 29 W, Pacific
6 pp
13. § OURCE a 1 y | 2. Location | Boo 109.29% Sogn) DATE - TIME GROUP Feb 65 19/0237z fohasd cal ob bright white ate. no sound, trails exhaust or Features n
February 1965 | Colorado, Woodland Park, Colorado
7 pp
! Civiiian and 1). DATE - TIME GROUP 15 February L685 19/02 B SOURCE | 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS ~L = 10 Seconds — me 16. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | Cround- Visual 7. course D ¢
February 1965 | 64, 12 N 11, 35 W, Atlantic
1 pp
| Satellite (HCHO II) At the tire of the cbssrvation CHO II was | § Norih "Test heading Best/Southast. This places the Satellite in 111] Vi sib] Lie 0 the Lorin Rit SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS C
February 1965 | Hugo, Oklahoma
5 pp
February 65 20/19157 13. SOURCE 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS |< SCOR CITES. Description confrons rith cluster balloon [11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYS
February 1965 | Washington, Dc
4 pp
i i | 1). "DATE * TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION In i EE 3 — = . 13. SOURCE | Civilian Astronomical ( aRCTURU 5) |4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS One | 3 a i Yellowish object as large as an a/c
February 1965 | Kingsley Field, Oregon
5 pp
| flitary Astronomical (I{:TEOR) A X | pre== — | Pat indicates that of a netecor oofervation. Althought there wap f 7 joven. decays on this date, Characteristics are of the fireball = One Ev
February 1965 | Webb AFB, Texas
MILITARY 6 pp
Rr i 3. source = eh Fock ste lita | _AmRoRAFT ies indicate an a/e observation. the sighting could L0T have been regarded 2s an 1 afc observation. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Lh KC~135 was Tast
February 1965 | Srockville, Maryland
10 pp
EET TE | 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS c=8 in 1 Clus ter 5. PHY SICAL EVIDENCE | | 0 Yes "2. LOCATION [10. concLusion Oth er (BINDS) | WW = 0 a i= lothing pr
February 1965 | Houma, Louisiana
14 pp
) : a | = i i: = = ds =, 3 —— se — = a — == ———— — y LOCATION 3 = : i # w Houma, Louininng / Ee ee a ET TT, es = | 110. CONCLUSION | Flite consistant with aircraft ZF SUMMARY AND AN
February 1965 | Ft Benning, Georgia
5 pp
4. "NUMBER OF OBJECTS “Hig Foring oto |5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION |11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS BR a x a nyaii Y =C—a | i | 20 Sec Obj, 30 in Trail Observer looking South. White light, ro
February 1965 | Rivesville, Wvirginia
Multiple 27 pp
). DATE - TINE GROUP Po00 local 1300%z |Last part of Feb 65 10. CONCLUSION 1 tR: PSYCHOLOGICAL 1 ea: Psychological interpretations of witness. |5. LENGTH OF OBS
February 1965 | Olean, New York
4 pp
"DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION EE — rs. CoNCLY $10N ASTI ONOMICAL: ARCTUR U ration of sighting at 1 hour 25 min, and ob, 5 speed of — » high alt inconsistant with the rat
February 1965 | Liberty, Ohio | Incident #9272
INCIDENT #9272 19 pp
File 9272 Februa ry £ ’ 1964 ka i liberty, Ohio rato pNoOLOS
February 1965 | San Fernando, California
4 pp
a g 1. DATE - TIME GROUP | 2. LOCATION Eo CL ad ERT 1 a [ | = A | hr : 14 nN Ral ats id i Sy TOL E a — id i i = = Ow # Bl le2eT ot Lion i h San Fernando, Californiz ~|3. SOURCE 10. CONC
February 1965 | Talahassee, Florida
19 pp
2. LOCATION ‘SOURCE EE 10. CONCLUSION Astronomics 1 ¢ ETE BR) | IF 13 BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Eluisn object round sound, Al dusk, Cast, mph). 2.
February 1965 | Jacksonville, Florida
13 pp
[ 2. LOCATION Jacksonvi lls 2 I] lor i ida 3. SOURCE Civili m 1 ower Op sratdr, |Experienced Tower Operator. Thought to be PO a Not ECHO
February 1965 | Richmond, Virginia
5 pp
Hy i al BOL ALT ary 65 ea 21102 aE Wl Hi _ = _ | IT BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS | Sg, | Si heodolite . ard (5. Tyre OF OBSERVATION | up on
February 1965 | Wyandotte, Michigan
19 pp
= mmm lio sound thite co. 5, “ nes LW TEST DEV BE Be prior to | § 1 ¥) = 7 Fi = hs ptf a hr B J ETT f= =. = W Jd lh Riliznt to ETD sep 63 0-329 (TDE) previeus sditions of this form may be us
February 1965 | 35, 45 N 174, 15 W, Pacific
3 pp
il — fr T— ee " ————————— —— ee ee et RE a — — hcl =, ! 1. DATE - TINE GROUP | 2. LOCATION 1 | a | | 2 February 65 03/0630 35.450 174.154 a. I 13. SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION | | End litany | INSUFF
February 1965 | Spring Lake, New Jersey
4 pp
% — » . DATE - TIME GROUP 2 - 3 February 65 . "MIRCE El Em pr Renorted | 7. course = 1 N/A f— Fr aE FORM ‘|10. CONCLUSION [Negatives requ
February 1965 | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
12 pp
Ca Eo = - | iN or = h i i i 3 é i = 3 | i Fr r a_i = a ii = dd i i i i ¥ a | i 1 i = 3 iil i 1 Fil i mo Fea a | 1 i | iE 1 ar Nall C Nn Ee [i pt al a Sy gy ow EE a i ey rio lm |. i 1 i 4 AT er 1
February 1965 | Morgantown, North Carolina
4 pp
3 “[10. concLusion Hoti on of 10st oe Ti RUSSENSGE OK. Four objects spotted at different intervals within Three were fading red colors
February 1965 | Janesville, Wisconsin
12 pp
[10- concLusion 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS One Astro (MATEOR) of fireball class. 1. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS LENGTH OF OBSERV
February 1965 | Moneta, Virginia
5 pp
FORM FTD seps3 0-329 (TDE) had made previous reports anl was out looking for objects. 10. concLusioN ATR Cit) ANT Cis gar alti 5 HEE of alumi nua 2-3 ft long and 12-15 inches in di ameter,
February 1965 | Liberty, Ohio
33 pp
5 | 6 February 65 — |3. source | — - a | | = ii OE : | Civilian i — — 1 R OF OBJECTS | N/A | 4. NUMBE I — = Fo [s. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION |11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 8 ys 5
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1960-05-7812601-Rhodesia-Africa.pdf
LOCATION Rhodesia, Africa
DATE May 1960
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 7812601
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 5
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 2 + 2 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. 1 5. PHOTOS 7. | LENG" | ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP $2) . . 3. DATE-TINE GROUP 3. DATE-TIME GROUP LN smn dimiianian X Ground- Visual AirViwal ~ SOL | 6. SOURCE | Civilian 6. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE Was Balloon Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon | Was Aircraft l Probably Aireroft Possibly Aircraft I edd Was Astronomical Pe. Probably Astronomical Meteo: Possibly Astronemical Other_ ia pe Insufficient Data for Evaluation