OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • • • ~ ·- -----:..--------- -- -- . --.- - -- . - 1. DATE • TIME GROUP 2. LOCATION 21 Mar 64 22/0lOOZ Roswell, New }fe:Jti<J.g 1. , f' d,,...~ l. SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION: .uinTFFIC!EN'J' ~~ ~!} fl·c...,~ • f\ ''\ DATA FOR EVAWI\TION t': Photo anal ysis indi cated that the obj r eported vas not the image ~c_i_v_~_·l_i_an ______________~on the photo. The i mage on the phot o was probabl y caused by a 4, NUMBER OF OBJECTS chemical drop on the film at some time during its processing. Since the photo din not sho\-T an image to compare with t he one observers descript of the si~thtin case restarde_d as InsufficiEmt 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. IRIEtr SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 5 minutes Bright obj like chrome reflecting sunlight . Time indi cated 6pm