GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
December 1963 | 40, 20 N 17, 40 W, Atlantic
3 pp
KE ne "ATIC FORM 320 (REV 26 SEP $2) “iy gta TE TYPE OF OBSERVATION 7 2X Ground- Visual 0 Air Vi sual pop Ss 0 Gr
December 1963 | White Plains, New York
14 pp
i 1 = ) Le § 4 3 = i ] 1 j= 3 . CONCLUS! IONS Naw Yor 3. DATE-TIME GROU ZH JAS Locaj. Bi Ry " y al | a ALN WT, - ns, 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ““ Ground-Yisual 0 Ground-Radar
December 1963 | Mc Minnville, Oregon
10 pp
oo gl il 3. I i lf — i Ir | : ¥ w D A = LL DATE LL Dec 63 Local __ __ a cs. Ee i i m— —— i i | EE i f 5 —- | "i hg | -— hs ot Neal Nob CMT... -- Ta EW ae ip PROJECT 1007
December 1963 | Snowmass, Colorado
4 pp
| 2. LOCATION ee [Snowe 88, Colorado 0 Ground-Rador fo. 8 BRIEF : SUWMARY OF SIGHTING So Visa oo fa TM pp em re a | WSAVALLOR | 9. COURSE varied moving
December 1963 | Washington, Dc
23 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 12 LOCATION MEE Pp LE 12. concLusioneS 8 | Was Balloon Probably Bailson 1 Possibly Bolloon { 1 3 = hr 17 . =f 3 ' T=5 Fa re Fe YT OBSERVATION Was Aircraft
December 1963 | Cinnaminson, New Jersey
11 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 1 i esi i = ron i ——— J ——— I — 2. LOCATION SEE———— Ae. CONCLUPONS $00 {0 Was Balloon gets ! Mawr Tarcay : Y.abhaltily Ralloon | L ® 1 iL AlN LI lla 11 13 OT 1 iL 3 2 i Le
December 1963 | San Jose, California
3 pp
EE iat siding i" = Fl. = 5 2D . L re oan J ose Californi Was Balioon Prehably Balloon Possi XH Balloon Was Aircrafs Probably Aircraft Possibly Aircraf
December 1963 | 38, 30 N 175, 20 W, Pacific
8 pp
PROJECT ° 1007 073 | RECORD CARD [Y DatE -, : | 2. LOCATION CSET CORSON 14 Dec 15 a 13. DATE-TIME === Local . eo . 6 aad A 0 Wes Balloon | 38. S01 1% {5 a \ Facil LLC, 0 Probably Ba
December 1963 | Kettering, Ohio
7 pp
a ial | = on Ne ugh slight overes green, "Looked like sign *arad to go out ATIC FORM 329 (REV 28 ap 52) 0 Air-Intarcent Radar Was Balloon Pioba
December 1963 | 40, 00 N 174, 54 W, Pacific
3 pp
| 16 peo 1953 3. DATE-TIME GROUP | Local FE oS OBSERV a 0 Ground-VYisual 2 Air Visual Lash BET O Ground-Rador COURSE “13. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. C
December 1963 | 33, 30 N 175, 40 Wpacific
3 pp
PROJECT ors § RECORD CARD “12. LOCATION ES CONCLUSIONS - | =~ | i Was Bolloon Probably Balloon Possibly Bolloon “14. TYPE OF OBSERVATION 0 Ground-Visual 33.30N 1
December 1963 | 25, 50 N 149, 49 Wpacific
3 pp
B DATETIME GROUSE | 5. PHOTOS [] ! - | i i. 10 Dec 1963 Local. EE ay i es | Be : i a" # | ¥ 20/0 | w GMT. = Was Belloon Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon Js
December 1963 | 31, 20 N 170 Wpacific
3 pp
PROJECT A RECORD CARD 21 De 2 1053 1 a (SR ET | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP 0 Wes Balloon f° 0 Probably Balloon i = Pusat bly Balloon
December 1963 | Clovis, New Mexico
23 pp
12. CONCLUSIONS i =, i Nj = i Hamm re \ | - : 2 | 0 Was Balloon -4 LEC LW | Clovis, New Mewi aa y WNTW MBXICO | L Prababl y Hal loon CBSERY | Possibly Balloon Ee —— en i i om Ce | 3. DATE-TIME G
December 1963 | Dayton, Ohio
15 pp
{ 1. DATE 12. LOCATION Dayton ’ Ohio Le ik IX Ground-VYi sual .. See View l LENGTH oF : OBSERVATION 12 minute 10. BRIEF SUMMARY © oF SIGHTING obj obse
1964 (month unknown) | Lansing, Michigan
37 pp
= = m 5 ee | J TEs al ey 1. - —— i — T_T BS ga i A te. OF CASERVATION i mi = i ——— i — —— (= le i i — == Eg ee, 1 ¥ EL i gE whe 7. | : Hm § DATE = LE HUMBER
1964 (month unknown) | Chatham, New Jersey
7 pp
EET Ee 5 Wer n=m i = Thies eg PROJECT 10073 RECORD 2. LOCATION . TIME GROUP 21.30 1 B NC) a La 7 IRR Suranlser [3 source 110. CONCLUSION i 1.145 |
1964 (month unknown) | Willingboro, New Jersey
5 pp
ei ROJECT 10073 RZ CO; sp 194 | a 3 satmcE + |w. TET Ca V ili 1 IMAGINATION } 4. NUMBER OF 03JECTS (Witnesses ag
1964 (month unknown) | Detroit, Michigan
44 pp
ya ERR RR RE cis Ee DATE te GRa0p) © © |'d Lecation 0 i i ri le i 55°13 | TE . = i 3, 50URCE 10, CONCLUSION . MUMAER OF OBJECTS | INFORMATI ge a E r ota mmr; or ENGTH oF 0 3
1964 (month unknown) | Middletown, Ohio
21 pp
eae a mE EE ESET = E — i or =i i ly + Sig i, A Fo ALT EE PE als Te PG we al EN WE Te WEE oF peli ae ete Wl a mm Eg mee Pm Bde { 2, LOCATION - a ic: 1 5 WR mi =, HW 06 0 ——— i ——— pT ca
1964 (month unknown) | Location Illegible
14 pp
January 1964 | Deford, Michigan
Other 18 pp
January, 11 Feb 6h | eMT_R 101 » 5, PHOTOS TATIC FORM Ji (REV 26 SEP 51) po ———— i ——— i ——— C— 3 T— | ——— = | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION : Giound-Visual
January 1964 | 34, 00 N 175, 00 W
3 pp
= = - = —— — eS — = wii aE TE = = ee a fa PE EE 2 ny. |0 Was Balloon l |O Probably Balieen | 10 Possibly Balloon | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION at gn Na ae 1 Craund- Radar |o Was
January 1964 | Dayton, Ohio
2 pp
wnd-Rodor J Aireintercept Rodor = Do AirVisdl 16 SOURCE | villian k | 8. ‘NUMBER OF OBJECTS 1 § einen a or ck vith the 7 Dayton. ye gpa were highly
January 1964 | Near, Crossville, Tennessee
Astro (Other) 10 pp
| 1. DATE 5 Jan 64 | mee RSENS | 3. 0 AT E-TINE > RO uP Fossyils, Tennessee GMT. 0 Air-intercopt Rodar "5 PHOTOS he | 3 NUMBER oF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE falling M
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1966-10-8279604-Yonkers-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Yonkers, New York
DATE October 1966
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8279604
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 12
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 9 + 6 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. [\. DAT: - TIME GROUP | 30 Oct, 66 13. source ~~ Civilian 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS ene |S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 4-5 minutes l6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION 7. COURSE == 8. PHOTOS 0 Yes MW Ne 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 7 Yas FORM: D sFp 43 0-329 (TDF) a ud PROJECT LOCATION Fe Yon! kers, new forg IIS REGURD ae one witness HERE —— i e— : 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Observer reported watching a star like object in the sky that moved to the left and then to the right. It appeared as a nermal star =xpancded and became much brighter. The object disappeared “rom view when it meved off behind some trees, The observer did nel provide any indication as te what direction the object was traveling. Mhé Inférmatien submitted is insufficient in that essential data is lacking. PBravisrma asditlsma af wile Fara maw bas ima 10. CONCLUSION Insufficient data fur evaluation