GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
July 1949 | Louisville, Kentucky
3 pp
• • •
July 1949 | Puyallup, Washington
2 pp
• •• •
July 1949 | Tallman, New York | Incident #415
INCIDENT #415 4 pp
• • I •
July 1949 | 64, 10 N 172, 00 W, Pacific
2 pp
• •
July 1949 | Mt, Hood, Oregon | Incident #416
INCIDENT #416 12 pp
July 1949 | Nampa, Idaho
11 pp
..
July 1949 | Columbus, Ohio | Incident #417
INCIDENT #417 8 pp
• •
July 1949 | Portsmouth, Virginia | Incident #417
INCIDENT #417 2 pp
• '
July 1949 | Southwest United States
37 pp
• ·"
July 1949 | Baltimore, Maryland
3 pp
Chron. 21! -185-170 Julyl8 , 1949 Balt imore, Maryland c photos
July 1949 | Jackson, Michigan | Incident #490
INCIDENT #490 2 pp
..........---~------------------------------------~-·~----~- • =-,~~--------~--~----­ File 490
August 1949 | Internal Document
412 pp
~x ;:::. .... ., - . :r m ,., Q VI (I)
August 1949 | Columbus, Ohio | Incident #418
INCIDENT #418 14 pp
August 1949 | 44, 15 N 132, 57 W, Pacific
8 pp
• I
August 1949 | Port Oconnor, Texas
3 pp
August 1949 | San Francisco, California
29 pp
August 1949 | La Porte, Penna
5 pp
August 1949 | Long Island, New York
18 pp
August 1949 | Tampico, Mexico
3 pp
--------------------------------~--------------
August 1949 | Death Valley, California
2 pp
August 1949 | Medford, Oregon | Incident #419
INCIDENT #419 11 pp
August 1949 | Manitou Springs, Colorado
5 pp
'
August 1949 | Biloxi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi
17 pp
,
August 1949 | Hebgen Lake, Montana
48 pp
August 1949 | Hindsville, Arkansas
8 pp
' •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1968-09-9677600-Cincinnati-Ohio.pdf
LOCATION Cincinnati, Ohio
DATE September 1968
EVALUATION Insufficient Data
CASE NO 9677600
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 43
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • .. __.. . . ·- ... .. ._ - - ··· . -·--· ... -· - • • • , .I p;:OJECT 10073 RECORD • • • • 1. DATE • TIME GROUP 2. LOCATION Cin':1nnat1, O!lio 3. SOURCE 10, CONCLUSION c.~~~~--------~ INSUi'l''ICIENT DATA. FOil EVALUATI~~ 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS One ~ S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS • The observer called to say that her daughter had sighted and 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION photographed a UFO. Neither the torm 117 o~ photograpbea beeJa forwarded to thia ottice as ot 25 NOY 68• • Ground-Visual • •