GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
July 1949 | Louisville, Kentucky
3 pp
• • •
July 1949 | Puyallup, Washington
2 pp
• •• •
July 1949 | Tallman, New York | Incident #415
INCIDENT #415 4 pp
• • I •
July 1949 | 64, 10 N 172, 00 W, Pacific
2 pp
• •
July 1949 | Mt, Hood, Oregon | Incident #416
INCIDENT #416 12 pp
July 1949 | Nampa, Idaho
11 pp
..
July 1949 | Columbus, Ohio | Incident #417
INCIDENT #417 8 pp
• •
July 1949 | Portsmouth, Virginia | Incident #417
INCIDENT #417 2 pp
• '
July 1949 | Southwest United States
37 pp
• ·"
July 1949 | Baltimore, Maryland
3 pp
Chron. 21! -185-170 Julyl8 , 1949 Balt imore, Maryland c photos
July 1949 | Jackson, Michigan | Incident #490
INCIDENT #490 2 pp
..........---~------------------------------------~-·~----~- • =-,~~--------~--~----­ File 490
August 1949 | Internal Document
412 pp
~x ;:::. .... ., - . :r m ,., Q VI (I)
August 1949 | Columbus, Ohio | Incident #418
INCIDENT #418 14 pp
August 1949 | 44, 15 N 132, 57 W, Pacific
8 pp
• I
August 1949 | Port Oconnor, Texas
3 pp
August 1949 | San Francisco, California
29 pp
August 1949 | La Porte, Penna
5 pp
August 1949 | Long Island, New York
18 pp
August 1949 | Tampico, Mexico
3 pp
--------------------------------~--------------
August 1949 | Death Valley, California
2 pp
August 1949 | Medford, Oregon | Incident #419
INCIDENT #419 11 pp
August 1949 | Manitou Springs, Colorado
5 pp
'
August 1949 | Biloxi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi
17 pp
,
August 1949 | Hebgen Lake, Montana
48 pp
August 1949 | Hindsville, Arkansas
8 pp
' •
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1949-06-6314379-Huntsville-Ohio-381-.pdf
LOCATION Huntsville, Ohio
DATE June 1949
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 6314379
DECADE 1940s
TYPE Sighting
INCIDENT #381
PAGES 13
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • • - "' • • I • • PROJECT 10073 RECORD : 1. DAlE • T iit~.: GROUP 2. . ~ATION • • ~ Ju."le 49 ll/2220Z 11 Huntsville, Ohio \k:-..----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------~ sou~ce 10. CONCLUSION i~ Civilicm AIRCRAFt • • ·~ 4. NU;.;BER OF OBJECTS I ~ No data presented to indicate object could Nor have been an A/C. P One ., ·~ 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS , Ydnute~ • • j