OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.
Tr EE Dh EN TT TT I “112. CONCLUSIONS
CF) Who Lér Cie |D Was Balloon
2 SEMEN LMA29W (i £ YFIC) |B Peobobly Suleon |
14 TYPE OF OBSERVATION |O Possibly Balloon
0 Wos Aircraft |
| 0 Probably Aircraft |
3. DATE-TIME GROUP
Local = a
20 Ground-Yisvel 0 Greund-Redor
wy 4 5 : | Baal bli ABIssculs
_OMYC +0097 ald E o Mr De rs Oo 1 Air-Intercapt Radar DO Possibly Aircraft
| DX Was Astronomical My eTEoll.. |
{0 Probebly Astronomical |
| 0 Possibly Astronomical
|0 Other |
0D Insufficient Data for Evaluatio on |
| Civilian
| 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION "| 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE
al ie
: 3 sec | 1
110. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING
0 Unknown
lulsn~-w OMMENTS eport turned in Tor corre.
| Ziscernatle shape; had iis type other report. (Time did not c 0
| <rail of smoke like contrail. Ass at time ther report.) Since observers assumed)
| 0 te meteor. obit was neteor, it is logical to assume
th=ir evaluation was correct.
|
Ld
EE il
ATIC PORM 329 REV 26 BRP 52)