GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
74
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
May 1949 | Westfield, Indiana
5 pp
May 1949 | Roanoke, Virginia | Incident #327
INCIDENT #327 37 pp
May 1949 | Boise, Idaho | Incident #319
INCIDENT #319 40 pp
May 1949 | Hickam AFB, Hawaii
MILITARY 4 pp
•• .. ,•
May 1949 | Davis Monthan AFB, Arizona
Aircraft MILITARY 14 pp
May 1949 | Adak, Alaska
4 pp
- . ... .. -· . ... .. --..- .···- -- .... .. . -·- . ...... ..
May 1949 | New Orleans
34 pp
May 1949 | Fort Bliss, Texas
10 pp
:----~·_._- ---------------- -·· -. - PROJECT lOC: ; . ·. : J t:
May 1949 | St Louis, Missouri, NAS
MILITARY 28 pp
---- --- -- .. ·-·-- -.. ·-- .- -· - . - ·· - ·- . - ... - . . . . .. .. u . ... • .------ 1. DATE
May 1949 | Dallas, Texas
23 pp
May 1949 | Moses Lake Air Force Base, Washington
14 pp
• • •
May 1949 | Caddo Lake, Louisiana
6 pp
• •
May 1949 | Camp Hood, Texas
63 pp
• • • • • •
May 1949 | Moses Lake AFB, Washington
MILITARY 5 pp
May 1949 | Rogue River, Oregon
5 pp
• • •
May 1949 | Hill AFB, Utah
MILITARY 13 pp
•• PROJECT 10073 RECORD ----------------------------~
May 1949 | Southern Oregon
39 pp
'
May 1949 | Elko, Nevada
10 pp
• •
May 1949 | El Paso, Texas
13 pp
• •
May 1949 | Sacramento, California
4 pp
• I
May 1949 | Honshu Island, Japan
10 pp
• •
May 1949 | Parma, Michigan
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 17 pp
May 1949 | Morgantown, West Virginia
6 pp
/ I • • • ,
May 1949 | Shamya AFB, Alaska
MILITARY 19 pp
P ROJ::CT 1C0;3 R~CO~O l ~-------- · ~-·----------------------
May 1949 | Boise, Idaho
4 pp
Chron . 24-185-164 May 13, 1949 Boise, Idaho 3 photoa
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1968-11-7170749-NorthMerrick-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION North Merrick, New York
DATE November 1968
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 7170749
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 13
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. P ~OJECT 10073 RECORD • 1. D~TE • TIME GROUP ' 09/2300 2. LOCATION • • '.. • _Q Nn v1'~r _ffi 1 rlloL1 • Nrtr_' .h Mo..rr_ick ~ ew:,_~~:O..w •ru·lk~---------~ • 3. SOIJRCE 10, CONCLUSION .Ci vil ' an Possible Other (GROUND LIGHT) .4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS I Thet·e is no r e ason why the observation could not have been I _OnF> of a gr ound li bht reflecting from the cloud bases . S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11, BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 1 Second 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION